NHL Rumors Mobile

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.


(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

We now send some Montreal Canadiens posts to our Habs Rumours site

We also send most of the Leafs posts to our Leafs Rumors site

If you are looking for rumors that concern just your team, please visit our NHL Teams Rumors page.

The sent in rumors have been split into 2 pages. The NHL Talk page is the other page.

23 May 2017 20:00:47
T. Brodie + B. Kulak for S. Reinhart + 2nd 2017

S. Bennett for S. Theodore + 2nd 2017

Believable0 Unbelievable2

23 May 2017 21:39:30
Theodore>Bennett.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 21:48:33
I like how Bennet plays. But You're not getting a young D like Theodore + for him.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 22:44:58
I'd just like to point out Theodore has yet to play a full season and he was drafted a year before Bennett not to mention Bennett has more potential.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 16:22:44
Solely depends on LV taking Silfverberg from Anaheim, which unless Anaheim can figure something out, he'll be taken.

Oil: Eberle

Knights: Silfverberg

I think this is smart for both teams.
Silfverberg better fits Edmontons mold as a bigger team, and he also would be perfect RW addition with his shot and big body.
Where as Vegas gets a better scorer, and they take on more cap but they need to reach the cap floor anyhow so I don't see a problem for cap issues.

Thoughts?

Believable2 Unbelievable8

23 May 2017 17:12:09
Haha a overpaid bottom six forward for a good top 6 one with size and grit to his game. You are more dumb that I fought bro.

Agree4 Disagree3

23 May 2017 17:35:13
If Edmonton can get rid of Eberle and that contract they will. They won't get much of a return though and certainly not Silverberg.

Agree3 Disagree2

23 May 2017 18:52:30
I don't think anyone gives up silfverber got Eberle. When the games get big, he has shown he gets better. That can't be said for the other guy that makes a lot more. Vegas would be happy with silvferberg I'm sure.

Agree1 Disagree0

23 May 2017 19:04:21
This could actually make some sense. Comparable stats Both with two years left on their contracts. Only think is Ebs $6 million salary.

I would say a fair trade.

Agree2 Disagree2

23 May 2017 19:12:04
Lol ya totally forgot a 50 point player on a down year is a bottom 6 forward. Forgot bro. You're so smart.

Agree1 Disagree3

23 May 2017 19:13:56
And with Silfverberg, he had a breakout playoffs. What does he do all year tho? Yes he's a good player but Eberle is far the better scorer throughout his career. But ya forgot I'm dumb and he's a negative value player lol. Ok.

Agree1 Disagree3

23 May 2017 19:14:36
Ahah you must be Mcjesus second account lol. No way somebody with a minimum of sense thinks this is fair. Silverberg is better younger af cheaper. Eberle is older weaker and expensive. Plus he's a cancer in the locker room and think he's a superstar You'd have to give Vegas a pick to get rid of him lol.

Agree1 Disagree1

23 May 2017 20:14:17
Silf was the ducks best player in the playoffs, minus GEtz.

No from lv.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 20:26:27
Silverberg scored 23 goals to Eberles 20. Then he scored 9 more to 0 in the playoffs. He's a good young power winger who will not be traded for Eberle.

Agree1 Disagree0

23 May 2017 20:29:21
Okay golden, I agree Vegas wouldn't do it. But bottom six forward is not accurate for a skilled 50 point guy. also younger? they're like 150 days apart in age lol that's a dumb argument too. You're an oilers hater but when you go over the top with dumb arguments, people start dismissing your valid ones. I would want a pick of some sort to justify the money difference, but player wise, as different as they are, I think the value they could bring to a team in need of their respective player types would be pretty even.

Agree1 Disagree0

23 May 2017 20:40:54
Silverburg is as good, Younger and Cheaper. No from the Knights Eberle is over payed.

Agree2 Disagree0

23 May 2017 21:00:01
He's not a bottom 6 F and he's not a cancer in the locker room. Both those remarks are pure clueless hate. You're such a broken record it's so sad man.

Agree0 Disagree2

23 May 2017 14:32:55
EDM: RNH
MON: Gallagher, Beaulieu

Believable1 Unbelievable6

23 May 2017 16:12:52
Oil needs RHD.

Agree2 Disagree1

23 May 2017 16:23:29
Take out Beaulieu and maybe a deal. Doesn't Edmonton have enough gritty forwards though?

Agree2 Disagree1

23 May 2017 14:04:58
To MTL:
RNH
Pouliot

To EDM:
Gallagher
Plekanec

Habs upgrade at C, Oilers upgrade on RW plus a swap of two overpayed players who could benefit from a change of scenery. Salaries almost equal. Eberle would be flipped for D.

An example of F lines next season:

EDM:
Maroon - McDavid - Puljujarvi
Lucic - Draisaitl - Gallagher
Slepyshev - Plekanec - UFA
Caggiula - Letestu - Kassian

MTL:
Pacioretty - RNH - Radulov
Byron - Galchenyuk - UFA
Lehkonen - Danault - Shaw
Pouliot - McCarron - Mitchell

Believable4 Unbelievable6

23 May 2017 16:24:36
Honestly doesn't help Edmonton imo. Feels like a downgrade.

Agree2 Disagree2

23 May 2017 18:56:51
Unless puli has a real big offseason, I don't see him playing top line. If he is on that line, your team probably isn't as good as this year, unless like I said, his game really grows in a hurry. Value wise tho, oilers are giving up the best player in the deal (RNH) and I feel like gallaghers role can be filled cheaper, as good as he is at it. He's going to be an expensive role player. Guys can do his job 80-90% as good for 50% of his money.

Agree1 Disagree1

23 May 2017 20:22:57
The Finn was a healthy scratch during the World Hickey Championships. He has a lot of developing to do to even make the NHL so being on the top line may be a little off.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 11:53:56
Arizona: Anthony Duclair

Philadelphia: 2nd round pick

Duclair could benefit from a change in scenery. Is this off? If so what would it cost?

Arizona: Anthony Duclair

Philadelphia: 2017 2nd round pick, 2018 2nd round pick, Andrew MacDonald

Just curious what the price for the cap dump might be

Tampa Bay: Jonathan Drouin

Anaheim: Sami Vatanen

Tampa needs defensemen and Anaheim could get rid of some. Pretty simple. But do you guys think Tampa rather have a cheaper one cap wise?

Believable3 Unbelievable5

23 May 2017 15:48:26
No thanks, Drouin should not be traded and IF it ever happened, it surely wouldn't be Vatanen but Lindholm.

Agree1 Disagree3

23 May 2017 19:37:27
Okay Draisalt Drouin is worth Ljndholm. AND I'm Rocket Richard.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 20:16:21
@drai
no way from ana on drouin/ lindholm. Lindholm is their best dman.

Agree1 Disagree0

23 May 2017 20:50:53
Young skilled forwards are tough to part with, but a year later I don't know how many oilers fans would want a re-do of the hall trade. In the weeks after it happened I think most did.

Agree1 Disagree1

23 May 2017 20:46:18
Draisaitl. Tampa needs D, drouin is the best chance they have to get one. The premium on D means initial trade might seem lopsided but like the hall/ Larsson deal has shown, if it fills a need and you can live with the price, your team will be better. I don't think many people would argue with you that lindholm is better, but I believe yzerman wanted a RHD more, and again that comes with An added premium and is why vatanen might be the one he gets. I think this is in the realm of possibility.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 21:52:26
Ducks say no on lindholm. Lightning want RHD. Vatanen is a good young RHD with a pretty cap friendly deal at 3 more years at less than 5 mill. Could be close.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 08:08:23
Vancouver: Tanev, 2nd rounder
Stars: 1st rounder


Canucks draft Glass and Makar/Heiskanen

Believable1 Unbelievable9

23 May 2017 08:23:28
Terrible for Canucks

Agree1 Disagree8

23 May 2017 12:02:38
Terrible for the Canucks? How about terrible for the Stars. In no way does that land a top 3 pick.

Agree9 Disagree1

23 May 2017 21:01:54
Yaaaa I kinda like Tanev and think he would be a good fit in Dallas or Toronto but not for the 3rd overall. Lol. And a 2nd round pick doesn't make up for it. Easy no from Dallas. Vancouver adds.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 07:02:13
Vancouver: Chris Tanev, 2nd round pick (33rd Overall)

Philadelphia: 2nd Overall.

Believable1 Unbelievable12

23 May 2017 08:23:45
CANucks add

Agree6 Disagree1

23 May 2017 21:02:22
This is horrible. Not a chance you get the 2nd overall for that. Wow.

Agree0 Disagree0

23 May 2017 00:55:08
EDM- 2017 1st (22nd overall)
Las Vegas- 2017 2nd (34th overall)
*Vegas picks Pouliot

This year and next Oil have to resign McDavid, Draisaitl, Maroon, Kassian, Nurse, Benning and a few other depth players. Getting Pouliots 4 million off the books is going to be a pretty big deal.
Vegas another 1st rounder in there first draft and gets a middle 6 player.

Another possible idea would be doing what Chiarelli did this season and trade a 6 million dollar man and sign a free agent. If they have the cap space but not sure they will.

EDM- Eberle, 2017 2nd (34th overall)
NYI- Hamonic

Sign Oshie (6 million for 4 years)

Believable6 Unbelievable5

23 May 2017 02:18:06
NOt near enough to take on pouliot. MAybe lower the vegas pick. Eberle is not getting much of a return.

Agree1 Disagree7

23 May 2017 02:51:49
Maybe. Chiarelli really wants a second round pick according to some reports.

No from Islanders obviously.

Agree1 Disagree3

23 May 2017 03:57:35
See pouliot and a 1st for a dec pick that's a good deal.

Agree5 Disagree2

23 May 2017 04:26:28
Hamonic had a down season too. -21 when he's usually a plus player. I know he had a down season and it lowered his value but Eberle still had 20 goals and playing with JT would instantly boost his numbers.

Agree4 Disagree2

23 May 2017 13:50:03
As much as Oshie being on the Oilers might make some fans wet, I don't think signing him at 6 mill is a smart idea.
I'd probably pull the trigger on the LV trade but not the Hamomic trade, I don't think Chiarelli is pulling a deal to change his top 4 D unless he's undoubtedly winning the trade.

Agree0 Disagree1

23 May 2017 19:09:53
Edmonton does not have a 2017 3rd Round Pick.

Agree1 Disagree1

23 May 2017 19:39:35
din't they get one in the Yakupov trade bro?

Agree0 Disagree0

22 May 2017 21:10:50
Calgary
A) Mikael Backlund
B) Rasmus Andersson

Montreal
A) Alex Galchenyuk

2nd Trade:

Calgary
A) Emile Poirier
B) 7th Round Pick in 2017

St. Louis
A) Nail Yakupov


Projected Line-Up

Johnny Gaudreau-Sean Monahan-Micheal Ferland
Matthew Tkachuk-Alex Galchenyuk-Michael Frolik
Kris Versteeg-Sam Bennett-Nail Yakupov
Curtis Lazar-Matt Stajan-Troy Brouwer

Believable7 Unbelievable6

23 May 2017 02:19:26
CAlgary says no to the first one but the second one could be a possibility.

Agree3 Disagree6

23 May 2017 03:34:16
Seeing as backlund severly outplayed gally tbis year, let's throw in our best d prospect as well.

Porrier is on personal leave from stockton, i doubt there's any interest in trading for him.

Agree4 Disagree2

23 May 2017 03:59:10
I'd do those as Calgary. Even though I would do it Calgary may not because they are quite high on Anderson and Backlund is so important to Calgary. Good ideas though.

Agree4 Disagree3

23 May 2017 04:13:54
What a shaft to Brouwer. On the fourth line and Yak ahead of him.

Agree4 Disagree5

23 May 2017 08:57:35
Backlund is def undervalued, prolly outscored Galchenyuk (didnt check) while being a superb defensive C.

Agree1 Disagree1

23 May 2017 13:37:08
You over-value Rasmus Andersson a lot.
He seems like a top 6 powerplay defenceman to me. Ryan Murphy type.

Canadians are looking for a scoring centre. A 40 point centre in Backlund isn't what they are looking for. He plays a good two-way game, that's basically his value.

Edmonton got less value out of Yakupov and his value certainly did not go up. He scored 9 points in 40 games last season. It's hilarious how you are inserting him into your lineup without even signing him to a contract. He is an RFA and a KHL team has his rights. He will likely go to the KHL.

Agree1 Disagree1

22 May 2017 18:37:47
Tor: Morgan Rielly

Buff: Alex Nylander and 1st 2017 ( Timothy Liljegren )

Who adds? Buff overpays for a young top 2 dman signed long term cheap who'd be perfect with Risto. Leafs get a replacement and An Elite prospect that fills up our Core for forwards.

Believable1 Unbelievable10

23 May 2017 01:39:05
How is this an over-payment for a top 2 defenceman?

2 players who have never played an NHL Game are obviously not worth a top 2 defenceman. And please explain to me why Buffalo will pick Liljegren with the 8th overall pick when there are better defencemen than him.

Agree2 Disagree2

23 May 2017 01:47:46
Why could you trade Reilly who is on a cheap contract and growing into a great defenceman.
Nylander and the 8th would be great to have but it would set us back.

Agree3 Disagree0

23 May 2017 02:00:17
Not saying Leafs would do it but that definitely is an overpayment. The D at 8 are projected to be top 2 D plus another projected top 6 forward. Reilly would be a good fit but don't think Buffalo would make that trade.

Agree2 Disagree2

23 May 2017 04:14:37
You're nuts. Clinically nuts.

Agree1 Disagree1

23 May 2017 08:58:37
Yeah because TOR needs another skilled F over Rielly. Value wise, BUF declines tho.

Agree4 Disagree1



 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass