Boston Bruins Rumours

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.


(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

28 Sep 2016 02:00:40
Apparently according to Bob Mackenzie, Johnny Gaudreau contract talks are at a cold war and stand still. Calgary should suck it up, doesn't wanna pay more than the captain makes. He deserves way more than gio, sign the kid 7 x 7yrs. God damn. Move wideman to boston they are looking for a top 4 dman, then you should have more spending money. Calgary has terrible tactics.

28 Sep 2016 07:16:49
why would boston want wideman, especially with that salary they don't have the cap room.

28 Sep 2016 07:26:46
Lol. Boston has to want Wideman and that $5.25M hit for one more year. And he has a NMC I just noticed, no clue the details on that, how many teams he can submit a list of or whatever. Funny how you would just assume Boston would want him. Who knows.
But Calgary management seems to be not wanting to budge from not wanting to pay him more than Gio. Seems they have principles and they want to stick to their guns. Interesting for sure.

26 Sep 2016 04:53:53
to Arizona:

Jacob Trouba

To Winnipeg:

Jacob Chychren and Nick Merkley

or.

To Boston:

Jacob Trouba

To Winnipeg:

Joe Morrow and Ryan Spooner.

26 Sep 2016 06:49:20
The Boston offer is really bad but the Arizona one is decent but they will need to add a legit NHL to it to. One who is capable of playing now.

25 Sep 2016 17:47:03
Jets: Trouba

Boston: Krug + Griffith/ Senyshyn

Gives Winnipeg a NHL defender (also Bostons top LHD behind Chara), along with a RW, something Winnipeg could use as they don't need a LW or C.

25 Sep 2016 19:50:08
Trading Krug for Trouba solves one problem but creates another, we get a top 4 RHD but now we would need a top 4 LHD. Boston only really has prospects to offer Winnipeg so i doubt they would make good trade partners.

25 Sep 2016 21:48:36
I think Bruins would defs be interested, they won't move Krug for him tho.

24 Sep 2016 23:41:03
Rickard Rakell for 1st 2017 (CGY)

Rakell gets an opportunity to play first line with Gaudreau and Monahan. He is reportedly looking into KHL. Calgary gets another young speedy winger that may play on the first line.
Calgary only gives up a first because Rakell is RFA and rights are worth a lot less than players with contracts. They could add a prospect just to make sure the deal goes through. Emile Porier?
Anaheim can possibly flip the first plus Fowler to a team like Toronto for JVR and a prospect. Anaheim can get a top LW that they are looking for.
Fowler + 1st 2017 (ANA) for JVR + Jeremy Bracco + 2nd/ 3rd 2018

Calgary can then trade Wideman to a team like Boston to clear cap to sign Rakell.
Wideman (50% Retained) for Conditional 3rd 2017 (Can drop to 4th, 5th or 6th based on performance)

25 Sep 2016 02:34:54
I wouldn't give up a first for rakell

23 Sep 2016 23:14:30
I wanna see if a trade could work to get Tkachuk's cousins.

New York Rangers:
- Kevin Hayes
Calgary Flames:
- Lance Bouma
- (2018) 2nd round pick
- (2017) 3rd round pick

Boston Bruins:
- Jimmy Hayes
Calgary Flames:
- Dennis Wideman (25% Retained)
- (2017) 2nd round pick
- Micheal Ferland

Gaudreau - Monahan - Frolik
Shinkaruk - Bennett - Brouwer
K. Hayes - Backlund - J. Hayes
Vey - Stajan - Chiasson.

24 Sep 2016 00:21:12
Some good ideas. I would like them to not give up Ferland yet though.

24 Sep 2016 09:02:47
Why he's nothing more than a grinder

23 Sep 2016 23:09:41
Boston Bruins:
- Brad Marchand
Edmonton Oilers:
- Nail Yakupov, Anton Lander, Griffin Reinhart, 2017 1st round pick

Helps Boston's rebuilding process getting younger with a RW, D, C, 1st in return.
Oilers Chia would have strong interest in Marchand after working with him in Boston and I feel Lucic and Marchand would be awesome with McDavid and he gets under your skin a lot.

Lines for EDM/ BOS would look like

Lucic - McDavid - Marchand
Pouliot - Draisaitl - Eberle
Maroon - Nugent-Hopkins - Puljujarvi
Hendricks - Letestu - Kassian

Yakupov - Bergeron - Backes
Spooner - Krejci - Pastrnak
Belesky - Nash - Hayes
Vatrano - Rinaldo - Randell

Yakupov gets put on a monster line with 2 skilled vets.

23 Sep 2016 23:37:56
El oh el.

24 Sep 2016 01:00:19
This is funny. Do u know the value of yak & lander?

24 Sep 2016 01:16:06
Would be an unreal top line.
But Marchand will stay in Boston or sign with Pittsburgh after this season to play with buddy Crosby. Mark my words.

24 Sep 2016 02:21:46
3 players you can have for nothing in a year and s top 5 pick? Take the Oiler players out and it's worth a discussion.

25 Sep 2016 19:57:41
So, just because Marchand and Crosby have been lighting it up inthe world cup and have been training together that means he wants to go to pitts and him and Crosby are good friends now? Bergeron has played ith him his whole career and taught him most of what he knows. Him signing with Pitts is obviously a possibility but the reasonings people are giving are ridiculous.

23 Sep 2016 17:46:30
pittsburgh: malkin, Kunitz
Boston: Krejci, Marchand.

Thoughts?

23 Sep 2016 18:35:53
they have Bergeron. nobody really wants kunitz.

23 Sep 2016 18:41:25
Don't see why Boston does this. They need a rebuild so they will want picks and prospects not Kunitz. Also they have Bergeron and don't need Malkin.

23 Sep 2016 19:49:43
That's so weird picturing Malkin on Boston wow, also no from Boston.

23 Sep 2016 21:21:39
Am I the only one that thinks this is a no from pits? Malkin is a top 10 player in the NHL when he's not injured.

23 Sep 2016 22:58:34
@VB

No argument that he is a good player.

The argument is his salary, also his and Kunitz's.

23 Sep 2016 23:02:51
Who cares if Boston has Bergeron, They could still use and want Malkin. Pitts has Crosby and still
Has Malkin. Teams love two unreal centers.
But anyways, Ya Boston doesn't want or need Kunitz.

There is however question that Marchand may want to go play woth Crosby and sign with Pitts after this season. Being great buddy's with Crosby and Pitts will lose the money of Fluery and Kunitz so they would be able to afford him. Something to keep and eye on.

22 Sep 2016 15:46:08
Calgary: Jimmy Hayes

Boston: Dennis Wideman

who adds?

22 Sep 2016 17:52:08
Flames.

22 Sep 2016 19:12:35
Maybe a pick from each.

23 Sep 2016 03:01:11
Flames fans would like this, me included.

21 Sep 2016 18:28:09
Was reading and flames wanna do so much but don't have any cap space after Johnny is signed. So I have some ideas

- Put Smid on LTIR or trade to Carolina, Arizona or NJ. Send package pack with a prospect like Chicago did sending pack Teravainen. Maybe Kylington? Or Poirier.
- Trade Bollig to someone who needs grit maybe a team with smaller people.
- Trade Lance Bouma and maybe send a low pick back, only has 2mil hit but a big waste of money on him.
- Trade Wideman to a team in need of D like Edmonton, Boston. Retain or sell for low draft pick.
- Trade Engelland as well, he's a RHD and honestly I can see Edmonton having interest in him. Big defender and can actually skate backwards quite well.
- Then they may have the ability to sign Russell to a one year deal, Versteeg, Jackman, Tanguay, Grossmann. Just options! But things to consider. Trevling has a problem with not willing to give to get. And that's a thing he should consider instead of praying on the old and weak to get younger and strong. Chicago had to give up Teravainen. Smid is useless so you really need to give to get rid of him. Or ride out the cap tight. Just some options. Thanks for listening! I'll post some example trades below.

Calgary: Ladislav Smid, Oliver Kylington
New Jersey: 6th Round Pick

Calgary: Brandon Bollig
Arizona: Future Considerations

Calgary: Lance Bouma
Carolina: 7th Round Pick

Calgary: Dennis Wideman
Boston: 6th Round Pick
(Due to his salary, and issue. I think a low pick would be fair and very helpful to Boston. Maybe retain? But the point is to fully get rid of the salary)

Calgary: Deryk Engelland
Edmonton: 6th Round Pick

Their roster should look like this

Johnny Gaudreau - Sean Monahan - Troy Brouwer
Hunter Shinkaruk - Sam Bennett - Michael Frolik
Lynden Vey - Mikael Backlund - Alex Chiasson
Micheal Ferland - Matt Stajan - Daniel Pribyl?

Mark Giordano - TJ Brodie
Kris Russell - Dougie Hamilton
Jyrki Jokipakka - Tyler Wotherspoon

(If they signed Russell)

21 Sep 2016 18:48:20
Some good ideas. Engelland is still useful and a leader though. And, Kylington is too good a prospect to include in this one. Good thinking though.

21 Sep 2016 20:00:30
My thoughts exactly Borje, Keep Kylington off this. Its a good base though, but some of these guys gone would create big holes.

21 Sep 2016 22:15:19
That's all a big dream land. All of that will never happen, Hope for one or two maybe tho.
Edmonton doesn't have a need for Engelland at all. They are bringing back Gryba for a PTO who is big and able to play 6/ 7 D role and is familiar with the team/ city already. They need legit top 4 guys, not bottom pairing.

20 Sep 2016 05:28:20
boston: Krejci
SJ: Burns

or

Boston: Krejci
Nashville: Ellis

or

Boston: Krejci
winnipeg: Buff

Who adds in each trade? any close? what one is most realistic?

20 Sep 2016 06:28:54
Wow. This is terrible (along with a lot of your posts)
Those three D men do not have the same value, Ellis far less than Burns and Buff.
And San Jose does not need a centre for their top 2 D.

20 Sep 2016 16:48:55
You don't care about reputation do you.

21 Sep 2016 01:10:38
SJ, Nashville and Winnipeg add. A lot. Boston laughs.

21 Sep 2016 06:48:40
Krejci is super underrated. Ellis doesn't have the same value as Buff and Burns. Your posts don't really give me much to think about but keep at them. Think more realistic and they should turn out to be controversial

20 Sep 2016 05:16:47
Chicaho: Hossa
Arizona: Dvorak +3rd

or

Chicago: Hossa
Boston: Griffith (if he's still on the team? )

or

Chicago: Hossa
NYI: Del Colle OR Ho Sang

or

Chicago: Hossa
Ottawa: Drieger + 3rd

what's closest? who adds in any of them?

20 Sep 2016 06:30:14
So bad.

20 Sep 2016 12:14:49
The only close one is Ottawa because Driedger most likely won't be a starter.

21 Sep 2016 01:43:22
By your reasoning here, Seth Griffith is worth the same as Dvorak and a 3rd? When you make 4 trade options for one guy, look back and see if the pieces from each team are equal. not even close here.

17 Sep 2016 04:45:35
While the rest of the league is going with speed, Chia continues to make the Oiler slower but bigger with the following trade: They do however, add leadership, a proven winner and a guy Chia knows.
Oilers: Nurse, Davidson, 2017 -1st, Yak
Bruins: Chara, Hayes.

17 Sep 2016 10:06:45
Vast overpayment for an old, aging, declining Chara.

17 Sep 2016 10:10:06
I get it, you hate the Oilers, think fans overvalue their players by a mile, but this proposal is just disgusting, you should be ashamed of yourself. A 39 year old LEFT Defenseman and a top 9 forward for a 1st that could be top 10, Yakupov, Davidson and Nurse! Wow I'm just astonished.

17 Sep 2016 11:08:53
This is so stupid man like why would you even post this. Seriously.

17 Sep 2016 13:50:36
Maybe Chara 5 years ago.

17 Sep 2016 13:59:14
That's just stupid. Chara 2 years ago wouldn't get that. And if you watched Him on the World Cup Europe team against North America, he was directly to blame for 3 of 4 goals in the first exhibition game. Great leader, seems like a great person, was a great player, but sadly he's done keeping up with a young league. Boston has to just pay him and slowly decrease his role as not to disrespect him.

17 Sep 2016 14:46:07
You extremely offended people now know what it's like every time you post a ridiculous overpay for a vastly overrated oiler. Let the Hall deal guide you. And Mcjesus and Flying V loosen your panties a bit. You are too uptight. A simple no to a rumor and a reason or a counter proposal is fine. Like a couple people said, Chara is on the decline and Hayes is inconsistent. Oiler fans of course would not trade future Norris winners like Nurse and Davidson or the next Bure for that.

17 Sep 2016 18:18:51
Lol you're the only one here who needs to loosen their pants if you think this is a good trade. Like actually tell me why that's good. When you post a pinball trade you're going to get treated like pinball. We all know you're smarter than that.

17 Sep 2016 18:32:42
Just terrible This would go down I las the dumbest trade ever for the Oilers.

17 Sep 2016 19:02:43
Lmao, chill kid, this is actually one of the dumbest trades any fan of hockey has seen. I question your knowledge, you realize Chara could retire next year at 40 and it we would give that for Hayes, think about it, just a bad trade "pinball 2.0".

18 Sep 2016 06:33:46
Bruins add a 1st, not the Oils.

18 Sep 2016 06:33:46
Bruins add a 1st, not the Oils.

16 Sep 2016 14:59:39
Boston- Jimmy Hayes
Calgary- Dennis Wideman
A Wideman trade to Boston was almost done last year until Wideman accidently brushed by Don Henderson. And, Boston could use Wideman. People in Boston say Hayes is a disappointment but if he gets a top 6 chance in Calgary, he may help.

16 Sep 2016 16:54:18
Calgary is stuck with him.

There is no team that would want him no matter what was offered as there could be a potential off ice Bertuzzi style court case side show distraction in addition to the officials of the NHL watching him like a hawk with no leeway. Untimely penalties to cost games is just not what any team needs.

Wideman needs to play out his year in CGY good and clean and hope the NHL officials union forgives him and that some team signs him when he's a UFA. Probably at a very discounted rate for a 1 yr term.

16 Sep 2016 17:11:00
" [. ] there could be a potential off ice Bertuzzi style court case side show distraction [. ]"

no, there isn't.

16 Sep 2016 18:03:30
Shankar
Last I heard the official was still suffering from the injury and I'm sure lawyers are drooling at this case when the defendant makes 5 mill a year.

How do you know for a fact that the official isn't going to sue him? Did the official sign a waiver and settle for an amount out of court already?

16 Sep 2016 18:09:04
I don't think Calgary will ever get rid of Wideman tbh. They have him till his contract is up and then he'll be gone.

16 Sep 2016 18:40:46
there's a whole lot of legal jargon involved in any sort of case you're proposing, and i won't go into it in much depth because, first and foremost, i don't know all the details (different jurisdiction, intricacies of the players' contracts and referees' contract which could render it impossible to bring a case based on consent or reasonably foreseeable risk on behalf of both wideman and the ref, etc. ), and secondly, i don't really want to.

though I will say a couple things:


First, Wideman making 5 mil means nothing. Damages are awarded relative to the lost income or incurred harm by the complainant, so the actual income of the defendant is largely irrelevant so long as he does have the means to actually pay any award given by the court. Damages aren't awarded based on income of the defendant in any way so long as, again, they have the means to pay (which wideman almost surely does) .

Also, the waiver thing could be part of the ref's contract or it could be part of wideman's standard player contract. I'm not saying it is, but it's possible - and i'd argue likely if you wanted an answer to that from me because it would keep messy things like what you're proposing from happening. Lastly, i can't imagine they settled anything already because there has to be a case filed for an out of court settlement to be reached, and any case involving that would have received so much publicity that it would have been impossible for us all to not have heard of it given the amount of publicity the incident itself got.

16 Sep 2016 19:23:47
If that ref is still hurt, he's milking it or had prior concussion problems, nhl players take much bigger hits for 15 years and don't have a problem.

16 Sep 2016 20:08:21
Considering Wideman is in the last year of his contract, he is defensively sound and has a hell of a clapper, I can see a playoff team acquiring him for a run. Very similar to the way Jason Garrison plays.

16 Sep 2016 20:20:52
I played against Henderson. I think he had a few concussions as a player. I actually think the refs are going to go out of their way to prove they are above holding a grudge much like they did with Tom Lysiak.

16 Sep 2016 20:30:34
The ref claimed to have a concussion the day after wideman mUsed the excuse that he didn't know what he was doing because he was concussed (which was a lame excuse) but the linesman is milking it for sure at this point. With all the new protocol on players, how can an official, who is in charge of controlling a game, and being a linesman is expected to be the first one into a fight, finish Officiating that game? It was all a ploy put on by the ref Union.

16 Sep 2016 21:32:12
Little more then a brush no.

17 Sep 2016 03:41:44
Absolutely it was more than a brush. But if he was that hurt he should have left the game. And if he finished the game, he shouldn't have waited to announce his concussion through a union statement an hour after wideman said he had one. Just looks like slimey courtroom sue/ counter sue strategy. No excuses for wideman, but I don't think it was handled right by anyone involved. League disciplinary included.

17 Sep 2016 14:24:25
Wideman hit a ref. I don't care if he had a concussion or was 100% fit. You touch a ref 20 game. The fact that an arbitrator reduced his suspension is B. S. If I was a the ref's union I would strike till the ruling is overturned.

17 Sep 2016 17:25:34
lol vancity, that's hilarious.

17 Sep 2016 19:57:38
They reduced his games from 20 to 10 after he sat out 19 lol the entire process was a joke from day one on all three sides. Player, refs, league.

16 Sep 2016 09:43:05
Plans for Calgary Flames to make a playoff push

Sign Gaudreau 7.5 x 8yrs)
Trade Dennis Wideman for a 5-6th pick to Boston
Trade Lance Bouma to Arizona for future considerations
Trade Micheal Ferland to any team for a 7th pick
Trade Matt Stajan, prospect to NJ for a 7th
Sign Dennis Seidenberg 2 x 1yr)
Sign Kris Versteeg 2 x 1yr)
Sign Kris Russell 3.5 x 2yr)
Trade a prospect and pick to Dallas for Valeri Nichushkin (ex. Kylington, 3rd )

Gaudreau - Monahan - Nichushkin
Bennett - Backlund - Frolik
Shinkaruk - Versteeg - Brouwer
Vey - Seidenberg - Chiasson

Giordano - Brodie
Russell - Hamilton
Jokipakka - Wotherspoon

Elliott
Johnson.

16 Sep 2016 12:07:45
Seidenberg is a dman. Do you know anything?

16 Sep 2016 12:38:00
How does this make them a playoff team? The don't improve. Also doubt Flames would trade Kylington and a 3rd for Nichushkin.

16 Sep 2016 13:12:27
Seidenberg at centre is hilarious. Trading ferland for a 7th is brutal. Market value might not be very high, but the way he performed last time flames made the playoffs show he's a more important piece than you can get with that pick. And Russell will either want 4+ years or a 1 year to try to have a great one and hit the market again next July. No 2 years. Other than that.

16 Sep 2016 13:33:30
my only explanation here is that he's thinking the Bruins just bought out Carl soderberg this offseason, not denis seidenberg even tho he's been on the Avalanche for well over a year. If that was his thought, soderberg and his 5 mill are not 4th line material but at least he's a big physical centre. If he was actually meaning seidenberg, then he's a real outside the box thinker when it comes to shaking up this flames line up lol.

16 Sep 2016 14:03:34
Bottom line is this doesn't make Calgary a playoff team.

16 Sep 2016 14:18:04
How are people this retarded like come on lmao Seidenberg a C? And Russell would've signed if it only took 3.5M trust me and no one wants your garbage players especially if they're giving picks even if it's a 7th.

16 Sep 2016 14:27:36
Can't understand how flames get better.

16 Sep 2016 14:34:41
Flames signed Brouwer to kinda protect the two young guys and chip in with some points, didn't give him that money to be a third line player.

16 Sep 2016 14:39:41
I just look at the flames line up and don't understand y they let colbourNE walk away like 2.5 for a big center that got 20 goals last year that'd a good deal.

16 Sep 2016 15:19:48
It certainly makes Calgary older.

16 Sep 2016 16:59:51
Dal Stars.

Playoff push means 4-6 years of development. No shortcuts for Calgary I'm afraid.

1. Draft top 5 picks when they finish near the basement for the
next 3 years to actually get more than 2/ 3's of a scoring line.

2. Get rid of over rated overpaid Dudgie.

3. Get players with some Pacific division size to them so they can
compete against the big boys in the division.


When they draft 3 more forwards in the next 3 years ( assume Tkachuk will be a top 6 forward) and get them NHL ready ( 2 yrs in minors) THEN the Flames might be a playoff contending team.

She's basementsville for a while longer I'm afraid till there's a real second scoring line and some size added.

16 Sep 2016 17:49:23
Meant Soderberg lol?

16 Sep 2016 18:52:13
Sorry most of these moves set the Flames back.
Ferland is a beast when he needs to be.
Bouma is better IMO then Vey or Chiasson.
Matt Stajan works as the 4th liner.
I'd like to see Nichushkin play one more year before trading that much for him.
Russell is barely a top 4 defensman and is severely overvalued. I believe Calgary has cheaper assets that can play as good or better than Russell. Jokipakka and Nakladal come to mind.
It would be great to dump Wideman but if it was going to happen it would have.

17 Sep 2016 04:15:34
Well if you meant soderberg, Colorado is going to be upset that you convinced their 5 million dollar man to come and play fourth line for you at 40% of the money.

16 Sep 2016 09:26:01
Dallas receives Alex Kokhlachev and a second round pick.
Boston receives Valeri Nichushkin.

Is this fair value? Also

Yakupov for Kokhlachev?

Heard the habs are shopping Beaulieu so can he get a return like Yak, Koko or Nuke?

16 Sep 2016 12:37:16
I could see Beaulieu for Nichishkin or Khoklachev, but Oilers don't need Beaulieu.

16 Sep 2016 18:13:59
Hey koko is going khl right.

18 Sep 2016 05:49:54
Habs better off keeping Beaulieu.

18 Sep 2016 05:49:54
Habs better off keeping Beaulieu.

16 Sep 2016 00:56:19
D. Wideman (50% Retained) + Conditional 3rd Round Pick in 2017 for Alexander Khokhlachev

Condition: A. Khokhlachev must sign with the Flames before the start of the 2016/ 17 season and play a minimum of 50 regular season games during the 2016/ 17 season otherwise a 4th Round Pick in 2017 is transferred.

Reason: Boston gets a top 4 d man (can play top 4 minutes) that they have been looking for. Alexander Khokhlachev will probably never play for Boston but he has potential to be a top 6 forward. Khokhlachev will have the chance to start new in Calgary.

16 Sep 2016 14:07:31
I could see it. From Calgary yes but Boston maybe.

16 Sep 2016 15:13:25
Flames are stuck with Wideman until the Ire of the officials is gone. Maybe next year if he plays a quiet and clean year.

16 Sep 2016 16:23:45
No from Montreal but if Price gets hurt which he won't. But if he does then Fucale and 2nd for Anderson and 7th.

13 Sep 2016 16:54:54
Bruins/ Canucks

Krejci Liles for Burrows Edler 3rd 2017

Almost same cap hit, and fills both team needs.

13 Sep 2016 17:14:55
Krejci has 5 seasons of above 60 points and is only 30. He's an elite center who is also a proven playoff performer. I may be wrong but I think it would take a much better offer to pry him loose.

13 Sep 2016 17:52:54
I fear Mr Burrows is done as an NHL player. As unfortune has it old age has caused him to lose a step. Sad to see players like Morrow, Horcoff and Burrows who relied on their skating to be the role players the were, now just too old to keep up with the pups.

Only way I see Burrows moving is if the Canucks and Leafs consider a trade. Burrows for Lupul as both are un-movable assets in the organizations. T. O. would get rid of a contract sooner by attaining Burrows, and Lupul would probably offer more to the current lineup than Burrows for this year for sure. maybe next year. Waivers for Lupul perhaps later on in the year, or next if he's ineffective.

13 Sep 2016 18:08:50
With Bergeron, Backes, Spooner and Moore. the center position is crowded. In trading Krejci they can help on defence and left wing.

13 Sep 2016 18:33:59
That does not make Boston a better team.

13 Sep 2016 21:12:14
The word Elite is thrown around a lil to loosely. Crosby. McDavid. those guys are elite. Krejci. solid. I wouldn't even call him a star. jus a good center, more of a second line guy.

13 Sep 2016 21:25:12
I agree with sosahabs.

13 Sep 2016 22:33:39
Krecji is a very good player, not elite but still not a good enough package from Vancouver.

13 Sep 2016 22:50:47
Agree. Krejci is a number 2 centre on a great team, number one on a mid to weak team. Still a really good player. Calling him Elite is subjective but that's still not enough for Boston to make that deal. Better than that whole package.

13 Sep 2016 23:05:34
Krejci was10th in ppg for centres last year, top 50 for points in the NHL the past 3 years despite playing 30-40less games than many on the list. I think you guys are undervaluing this player.

13 Sep 2016 23:21:21
Krejci is very good but def not elite.
And I thought Boston was going to play Backes or him at wing? I don't think they are too "worried" about having too many guys who can play center. And they def wouldn't trade him away for that package.

14 Sep 2016 00:08:00
I don't see Why Canucks would want Krejci but not enough for him. Also what are you talking about K99. Burrows can at least play in the bottem 6 and can still be somewhat effective as a Penalty killer, leadership etc. At least unlike Lupul, Burrows can play a full season, he also only has 1 year left in his contract so Nucks are fine holding on to him. Nice try though. Who knows if Burrows has a decent first 3/ 4 the season the Canucks could retain 50% on him and maybe get a 3rd or 4th from a contending team. Lupul is actually worthless. No team will take him unless they're dumping a worse contract.

14 Sep 2016 18:09:29
lol. some of the comments from Mtl. Krejci would be the first line center on the Habs. maybe the second too.

14 Sep 2016 19:18:31
Ya. Seabass. He probably would be. . I don't think any of us said we had better. .? . but the guy still isn't an Elite center. Jus like a Bruins fan. being a lil B.

16 Sep 2016 03:37:35
Sosa, you might not have said you have better today but you did once offer galchenyuk and eller for malkin. Lol. You must think galchenyuk is franchise changing to even post that.

17 Sep 2016 05:05:36
Well he is getting better. still jus a kid and got 30 goals. no. he's not McDavid. or even close. but. I'm glad that trade didn't go through. cause when Malkin is 35 years old scoring 45 points a year. Galchenyuk will be 28 and getting 70+. .

11 Sep 2016 17:13:55
Honestly I could see Gaudreau traded at one point here's my offer from Bruins.

Boston: Rask, Koko and 1st

Calargy: Gaudreau

Do you guys think this is fair I know a lot of people don't like Rask I personally still think he's a top 5 goalie with a down year.

11 Sep 2016 18:49:04
Doubt they would really have that much interest in Rask after aquiring Elliot and is Koko even going to play in the NHL? he seems like a little bit of a head case from what I've read. Flames would probably want a forward with a lot less risk than Koko.

11 Sep 2016 19:32:47
Who would play net for the Bruins? And Elliott is only signed for a year Calgary needs a long term solution.

11 Sep 2016 19:34:04
Well Eliot is a UFA after this year and Rask is a lot better.

11 Sep 2016 19:59:24
I have a feeling elliot will get signed long term mid way through season best goalie since kipprisof.

11 Sep 2016 20:05:50
@bud Subban I guess sign a UFA next year.

11 Sep 2016 22:20:19
He's the best because he is the only starting goalie they had since "Kipprisof"

12 Sep 2016 05:17:38
It's about time elliot was given a little bit of credit. He performed phenomenally against chicago and Dallas.

11 Sep 2016 16:47:24
Boston:Brad Marchand

Islanders: Ryan Strome and 2nd

Deadline deal assuming Marchand is on pace for 35+ goals. Him and Tavares would be Scary. Boston resigns him to a Zach Parise salery 7.1 mil for 6 years.

11 Sep 2016 19:43:15
If Marchand is on 35 goal pace, you are going to need to give up much more.

11 Sep 2016 20:07:34
Borje he is also a UFA tho.

11 Sep 2016 21:28:13
Who cares if he's a UFA or not, chances are he will get the money he deserves in Boston and he will stay there. That's not a good offer at all for him if he is a 35 goal scorer.

11 Sep 2016 21:59:20
Borje he's a UFA. That's actually a premium New York is paying here.

10 Sep 2016 01:28:54
Bruins/ Coyotes

Krejci for rights to Pronger Datsyuk 1st 2017

This saves term for bruins and a decent pick. Coyotes gets a true #1 center.

10 Sep 2016 07:14:26
Krejci 100% can get more than a mid-later first round pick. If anything they would want a defenseman. Not a pick.

10 Sep 2016 15:08:40
I agree they should get a D of moving a centre, but you think coyotes will be in the top half of the league to make that pick mid to late first? Tons of talent but all kids and dead weight contracts. I'm not sure on that.

10 Sep 2016 15:09:33
I think if Ari added Stone that'd make it more fair.

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass