No Avatar image uploaded
NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts
Galchenyuk's Profile
No Avatar image uploaded
Galchenyuk's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Galchenyuk's Posts
To Galchenyuk's last 5 rumours posts
To Galchenyuk's last 5 banter posts
To Galchenyuk's last 5 rumour replies
To Galchenyuk's last 5 banter replies
Galchenyuk's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Galchenyuk's rumours posts
27 Oct 2017 06:31:33
VAN: Tanev, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd
TML: Marner
I would say first round pick but I don’t think the Canucks want to give a 1st up
Also Nucks could maybe add more
Tell me what you think and what can be added?
1.) 27 Oct 2017 06:41:13
Um going to be a no from Vancouver.
2.) 27 Oct 2017 06:41:37
They can’t give up that many pieces and they’re defense is so horrible.
3.) 27 Oct 2017 08:04:53
At this point Toronto is desperate to find a fix to their defence after the corolina game so I think they just have 1 second instead of 2 2nds it’ll be fair for both sides and Tanev is one of the best defensive defenders on the league and that’s what Toronto need. Him and Reilly would make a great pairing for many years to come.
4.) 27 Oct 2017 13:53:12
Bad for Toronto. If they are trading Marnee it's in a deal with a better D than Tanev.
And I like Tanev, but I believe they could get him without using Marner But they probably have their eyes on a bit better of a D if they have Marner available.
5.) 28 Oct 2017 07:39:18
The leafs defense is brutal AO99 but they are far from desperate.
26 Oct 2017 17:39:13
VGK:Shipachyov
NYR: 2nd, 4th (4th becomes and 3rd if Ship plays 55+ games with the Rangers)
1.) 26 Oct 2017 18:44:20
This is pretty close I think. A 2nd def gets Vegas attention. Maybe add a prospect? I'm not really sure how Vegas and NYR value Ship right now tho. Not much to go off of. Lol. Maybe a tad bit better add to the second than a conditional 4th
But you could be bang on. It's good. I think Vegas just wants to move on.
2.) 26 Oct 2017 20:55:55
i'd say 1st instead of that but the 2nd/ cond 4th is fair.
3.) 26 Oct 2017 21:42:57
He also has a decent sized contract. I don’t know how good he is but he surely hasn’t proven much.
4.) 26 Oct 2017 22:44:27
His contract isn't scaring anyone. Only 2 years at $4.5m. If it doesn't work it's only this and next season. That is the plus side of trading for him.
10 May 2017 07:51:38
EDM: Eberle, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd
NYI: Strome, de Haan.
1.) 10 May 2017 12:40:04
No way from Edm.
2.) 10 May 2017 15:18:36
No thanks.
3.) 10 May 2017 15:54:19
I call double Troll trade alert on Galchenyk caz no one can be that clueless and hope such a ridiculous trade can take place!
4.) 10 May 2017 19:34:39
A lot better D out there to help oil if they're willing to pay that price. Strome is an after thought at this point.
24 Feb 2017 15:50:30
Habs: De la rose, 2nd
Tampa: Boyle.
1.) 24 Feb 2017 16:13:59
I like it tbh.
2.) 24 Feb 2017 17:14:13
Habs really don't need another bottom 6 player. Their problem right now is in the top 6.
3.) 24 Feb 2017 17:52:02
Good offer for Boyle but I agree Montreal might be looking at other players.
02 Dec 2016 06:09:11
Flames: Hamilton, 5th
Leafs: JVR, Carrick.
1.) 02 Dec 2016 13:40:35
For Freddie Hamilton? Are you kidding me? thi sis a joke hamilton has like 20 points in his career, no way the leafs trade a top 4 dman and a top line winger.
2.) 02 Dec 2016 13:43:58
If people don't understand that I was kidding I will clarify that I was.
Thats the trade i'd like to make as a leafs fan, I think it is fair for both sides. Carrick can replace Hamilton as a top 4 RD, obviously not the same level, but the flames get JVR to bolster their forwards group
I like it mate, maybe make the 5th a 4th but that depends on gms preference.
3.) 02 Dec 2016 15:55:11
This looks like a Fair trade if the pick moves up a notch or 2.
Good for both teams.
4.) 03 Dec 2016 09:16:04
Mr. Truculence has made it clear (even though he's not the GM - he speaks for everyone) that Hamilton is going nowhere. That these trade rumours are all an evil Leaf management plot.
We've seen this trade enough. Still looks reasonable; but I agree with Fair Trade, the pick should be a 2nd.
5.) 05 Dec 2016 23:19:52
Carrick is a top 4 Dman? Maybe in the AHL. But the trade isn't bad.
Galchenyuk's banter posts with other poster's replies to Galchenyuk's banter posts
02 Dec 2016 06:15:22
Let's be honest Matthews is a bust
Leafs : Matthews
Oilers: 6th
Jk.
1.) 02 Dec 2016 10:29:24
Good one Galchenyuk. Good one!
17 Jul 2016 22:34:44
Habs are talking to Galchenyuk about an contract extension. How much a year do you think he will get?
1.) 18 Jul 2016 01:18:58
Idk, how much do you want?
2.) 18 Jul 2016 03:26:16
6-7 years @ 5.5-6.5 Mil.
3.) 19 Jul 2016 17:12:12
12 years $14.238M per year.
27 Jan 2016 23:56:54
Tampa and Sens
Tampa: Drouin
Sens: Chabot, Peageu.
1.) 28 Jan 2016 13:38:46
I like Chabot, but the second piece should be better than pageau.
27 Oct 2017 06:22:06
Lindss what do you mean Leafs need defence and Carolina has a lot of defence prospects so adding a promising forward prosect.
26 Oct 2017 17:35:04
OEL on Toronto would be insane but do you think they would give up marner +++.
12 May 2017 04:49:21
Terrible for the oilers.
12 May 2017 04:47:13
These are bad Calgary is screwing everyone in these trades.
21 Feb 2017 05:32:52
Habs say NOT A CHANCE.
02 Dec 2016 06:11:30
Habs keep Patches, we don't want RNH.