NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

JBCF's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


JBCF's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To JBCF's Posts

 

 

To JBCF's last 5 rumours posts

 

JBCF's rumours posts with other poster's replies to JBCF's rumours posts

 

06 Dec 2016 11:59:42
To Mon: Ströme
To NYI: juulsen

To Arz: DD, hudon
To Mon hanzel.

JBCF

1.) 06 Dec 2016 12:18:32
No from anyone not named Montreal.


2.) 06 Dec 2016 12:48:13
O god i know strome is struggling but still gheez.


3.) 06 Dec 2016 19:41:27
Strome Is more valuable but honestly I think he's gunna turn out like yakupov


4.) 06 Dec 2016 19:49:58
Strome is less one-dimensional that yakupov. I feel if they actually keep him at his preferred position, or give him a change of scenery, he could do well. Same goes for Spooner in Boston.


5.) 07 Dec 2016 05:44:39
Juulsen will be top 4 D for Habs in a few years,

Strome is a bust.


 

 

04 Dec 2016 15:44:20
Boedker, coutour

1st, 2nd, Gallagher, sherbak

Patchioretty-galchenyuk-radulov
Boedker-coutour-Shaw.

JBCF

1.) 04 Dec 2016 20:08:56
Boedker is useless.


2.) 05 Dec 2016 00:13:44
Couture would cost all of that plus. Gallagher is a great player in his role, but adding a late 1st and late second and a decent prospect I don't think could pry a prime age centre like him. Especially after giving burns that contract, sharks don't want projects and picks. They need couture.


 

 

04 Dec 2016 12:23:20
Forgot another trade

To Mon: bozak, JVR
To Tor: emelin, sherbak, DD, Lindgren (goalie)

JVR-galchenyuk-radulov
Patchorietty-bozak-errikson
Grandlend-pirri-Shaw
Lekonin-plekanec-Mitchell

Shattenkiri-weber
Markov-petry
Bealieau-barbario

Thoughts?

JBCF

1.) 04 Dec 2016 14:08:48
Does that goalie happen to be Price because if not than that's a very easy no from the leafs.


2.) 04 Dec 2016 14:17:53
oh lord.


3.) 04 Dec 2016 20:14:37
do you think we want dirty emelin after what he did to jvr NO THANKS.


4.) 05 Dec 2016 00:28:03
That's a really easy no from leafs. If jvr goes it has to be for a good young top 4 Dman. Can't be for a bottom pairing D, cap dump, a young forward that leafs are flooded with and a minor league goalie.

Pacioretty and shaw

For

Polak, kapanen, michalek and sparks.

Clearly habs would want no part of that, think about it.


5.) 05 Dec 2016 13:07:00
Holly that's a bad trade for habs. Try this:

Tor: Matthews, Reilly, Marner

Mtl:Plekanec, Beaulieu, DD

That's fair right? Lol that's how the last deal you fans did felt.


6.) 05 Dec 2016 15:04:11
Lindgren is a pretty good goalie prospect, what the leafs lack, and he has a WAY higher value than Sparks (you could think of him having a little less value than Malcom Subban) . I still doubt this trade would be made as it only addresses MTL's needs.


7.) 07 Dec 2016 21:08:38
as a habs fan i will take that deal, unfortunitly me thinks the leafs say no.


 

 

04 Dec 2016 11:11:42
To Mon: Pirri
To NYR: 2nd, 3rd

To Mon: grandlund, errikson
To Van: Gallagher, 2nd, 3rd, hudon

To Mon: shattenkirk
To Stl: juulsen, 2nd (if Kirk resigns with Mon becomes 1st)

Patcheioretty-galchenyuk-radulov
Grandlund-pirri-errikson
Lethokin-plekanec-Shaw
Byron-Mitchell-deneaul

Shattenkirk-weber
Markov-petry
Bealieau-barbario

Thoughts?

JBCF

1.) 04 Dec 2016 12:02:10
Pirri was a free agent so no.


2.) 04 Dec 2016 15:50:14
Gallagher is litteraly one of the most annoting players in the nhl nkt teading him man.


3.) 04 Dec 2016 16:23:29
First of all you Pirri is not a top 6 forward. Granlund would be center in the second line before Pirri. Granlund I good he hasn't played to his full potential but he's still just 24.This would make more sense Bud:

Mtl:Patches, Lindgreen, 1rd pick,2rd pick 2017,Julsson, Sherback

Min:Granlund, Eriksson Ek, Brodin, Haula

Min Don't have depth in goalies, they will losse forwards in expansion draft if they don't make a move (their going to protect 4 D. With that Mtl will have 7 forward worthy of not exposing plus a solid Top 4D In Brodin.


4.) 05 Dec 2016 00:33:05
The granlund and eriksson he has in the trade is VAN. Loui eriksson. The shattenkirk one isn't too bad but blues might want a bit more. But the habs are giving up too much in the other 2 trades. That eriksson contract is tough to take on. Habs could have had him if 6 months ago for just money, not losing Gallagher and 2 picks.


5.) 05 Dec 2016 17:57:21
If blues are going to give up shattenkirk think better for ward prospect and 1st pick no matter what.


6.) 06 Dec 2016 16:57:25
Blues will get a 1st plus a great prosepct or just keep shatty for another cup run. No need to trade unless it helps us. right now shatty has the third most points with 19 under burns and karlson. So his value is high. Also if blues do trade it will be because he is willing to resign with that team maximizing the return. If not cup run with shatty.


 

 

03 Dec 2016 22:43:55
To Mon: camnelRi

To njd: 2nd, 3rd,4th.

JBCF

1.) 03 Dec 2016 23:57:03
Why would you even have him back.


2.) 04 Dec 2016 03:07:22
Oh so right as Cammalleri gets hot you want to underpayment for him. Easy no for New Jersey.


3.) 04 Dec 2016 04:15:27
Because he would be mtl best scorer immediately.


4.) 04 Dec 2016 07:26:00
who's camnelRi?


 

 

 

JBCF has no Banter Posts

 

 

JBCF has no Rumour Replies

 

 

JBCF has no Banter Replies