NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

cx's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


cx's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To cx's Posts

 

 

To cx's last 5 rumours posts

 

To cx's last 5 banter posts

 

To cx's last 5 rumour replies

 

cx's rumours posts with other poster's replies to cx's rumours posts

 

11 Aug 2015 23:21:19
just a few ideas

st louis trades:
rattie
2nd round & 4th rounder

arizona trades:
boedker


st louis trades:
berglund and a 3rd


boston trades:
koko

Edmonton trades:
draisaitl

new jersey trades:
severson
3rd round pick

cx

1.) 12 Aug 2015 06:03:02
Edm says no. They have a load of young dmen already, no sense trading a big C like Draisaitl (who can play wing) unless it's for veteran help on the top 2D


2.) 12 Aug 2015 06:31:48
@chirp I don't agree with you mc david and nugent hopkins take up 1st line and 2nd line so no need for draisaitl and they don't have many d prospects they could use another one


3.) 12 Aug 2015 07:51:47
They don't have many D prospects? What?
And, yeah, I guess having C depth is a terrible idea too, right? You're just, well, wrong.


4.) 12 Aug 2015 14:21:47
cx:

1. As Chirp set, center depth is super important, plus Draisaitl can play wing.

2. Pretty sure Chirp knows the oilers prospects better and he's right, they have loads of D prospects. Just because their NHL D sucks/sucked, doesn't mean they have no prospects.


5.) 12 Aug 2015 16:33:02
Blues say no to those proposals


6.) 13 Aug 2015 01:23:09
I agree with @Chirps comment, I don't know the oilers but what good young D prospects do they have besides Nurse, Klefbom and Reinhart?


7.) 13 Aug 2015 07:05:36
In terms of D prospects the Oilers have that could be of Severson-quality (including offensive and defensive Dmen here: Davidson (may even make the team as a 7th Dman), Musil, Lagesson. Oesterle. Gernat (tho he's sliding), Hunt, etc. possibly others I'm forgetting off the top of my head. And that's without including their top 3 (Nurse, Reinhart, Klefbom [tho I don't really think of Klefbom as a prospect anymore, he's essentially a lock to remain with the team after how good he was last season]). Severson might be a step up on Davidson but not by a ton and also has more experience. Does that make him worth Draisaitl? Not even close. Especially if you compare the Oilers C depth to their D depth:

Draisaitl, Yakimov (awesome, but bottom-6), Roy, Moroz (not living up to his draft position). That's about it. Something like that at least. Don't see how Draisaitl for Severson makes a lick of sense at all.


8.) 13 Aug 2015 12:11:44
Very well said there chirp.


 

 

11 Aug 2015 10:50:35
ari: boedker
bos: subban koko & a 3rd

tor: jvr and an okay prospect
car: faulk

edm: eberle
wpg: buff

cx

1.) 11 Aug 2015 13:08:27
B's say no! they're not trading a top centre prospect a top goalie prospect for an unproven commodity from ARZ. no thanks


2.) 11 Aug 2015 15:29:10
Boedker is more proven than anything in that trade. I think value is close on the first one, no way from Canes, no from
Oil Buff only has one year left.


3.) 11 Aug 2015 16:47:08
JVR is far from getting you Faulk in return. Buff is far from getting you Eberle.

Maybe a slight overpayment for Boedker.


 

 

26 Jul 2015 01:10:29
car: skinner
mtl: eller de la rose & 2016 2nd round pick

tor: jvr polak & an okay prospect
nsh: Wilson Fiala aberg and a 2017 1st round pick if not 1st round then a 2nd and a 3rd

looks like a lot but I think that's what toronto would ask for

cx

1.) 26 Jul 2015 08:32:09
Cool. I ask for the moon for player X. Will I get it? Most likely not. Stupid argumentation. That's if NSH was calling, but I doubt that's the case.


2.) 26 Jul 2015 09:02:25
Carolina and Nashville say no. Very easily too.


3.) 26 Jul 2015 15:06:02
Why would Carolina say no Skinner has been injury prone throughout his career and has never been able to match his rookie seasons point totals. I think it's a pretty solid return.


4.) 26 Jul 2015 20:47:16
That's practically giving away Skinner. They would be offered a more valuable piece by about 15 other teams than this proposed post. That's how Carolina says no.
Eller isn't anything special to be excited about, De la Rose is a so so prospect and a 2nd is meh. Replace De la Rose and the 2nd with a 1st and you get Carolina's attention.
If Perron can get a 1st and Klinkhammer. Than Skinner can get at least that (Eller and a 1st).


 

 

22 Jul 2015 22:43:26
pitt: malkin
mtl: plekanec fucale dela rose future 1st rounder and maybe another prospect

ari: boedker 3rd or 4th rounder
tb: drouin

tor: kadri gardiner 3rd round pick
nyi: okposo grabner

cx

1.) 23 Jul 2015 07:42:56
Way off on all these.
Pens say no.
Bolts say no.
Islanders say no.


2.) 23 Jul 2015 11:01:18
@yep I don't really agree with you when you say the Islanders say no. That trade could be an overpayment by the Leafs it were to happen, since both Okposo and Grabner are free agents next summer. But the only way the Isles would trade Okposo is if they knew early on that he did not want to resign with the team (I don't know why he wouldn't want to tho). Plus Grabner is pretty equal to that 3rd round pick if it's conditional that he plays a certain amount of games (e.g 65). That would leave Okposo (1y left) for Kadri (1y left, RFA) and Gardiner (4y left). Toronto is giving the Islanders a steal in both quantity and quality since Kadri has the ability to be a top line/2nd line centre, and Gardiner has shown glimpses of being a top 4 defensemen at a reasonable price for one. If I'm Toronto I am asking for a conditional first round pick from NYI. The condition being that if Okposo signs with the team before draft day 2016 then it becomes a 2nd round pick, if not it remains a first.


3.) 23 Jul 2015 12:48:54
I don't think Kadri OR Gardiner are worth thier contracts. and as you point out that Okposo is going to be a free agent well so is Kadri. IF Okposo was up for trade the Isles would get better offers as far as i'm concerned, those two peices from TO aren't exciting one bit for a very valuable player in Okposo. Besides, TO is rebuilding, wtf are you going to do with Okposo for the next 4+ years while rebuilding? He won't re sign there, would be an idiot for the time being if he did anyways. Makes no sense.


4.) 23 Jul 2015 14:04:19
Hahaha kadri a number 1 center, if he was then why has Toronto been searching for a number center forever. Kadri brings no value to the isles. They already are strong at center and playing centers on the wings. Okposo is a key piece to the team as he is a true top line winger, and JT needs him. Gardiner is trash, get over him, he at best will be no more than a 3rd pairing dman,

By the way Okposo is more valuable then JVR, look at their age and point totals, Okposo is 1 year older with 60 more points in the same amount of games played.


5.) 23 Jul 2015 15:03:57
Boedker and a mid pick for Drouin. Lol.


6.) 23 Jul 2015 15:15:41
Actually Okposo has 44 more games played then JVR, Okposo does have 57 more points but if JVR did play the same amount of games he would probably only be around 25 points behind Okposo. By the way Okposo does get to play with this centre, John Tavares.


7.) 23 Jul 2015 15:30:26
I'd take that Malkin trade. Lol. Ya . Unfortunately I live in fantasy land. and it won't happen . All I want is a number one center. Can't remember the last time the Habs had a true dominant number one.


 

 

21 Jul 2015 20:22:09
heard that toronto is looking for draft picks

tor: bozak
mtl: 3rd

tor: polak
edm: 3rd? not sure what polak is worth

bozak can take over 3rd line center playing with kassian and de la rose

mtl still needs a legit top line centre tho

mtl: plekanec fucale a mid prospect and a 2nd
stl: backes and a 4th

idk if any of these would happen but just giving ideas

cx

1.) 22 Jul 2015 01:24:31
Bozak can fetch more than a 3rd.


2.) 22 Jul 2015 05:42:54
Backes is good but not that set in stone franchise #1 he can play it but is better on the second line on an elite team


3.) 22 Jul 2015 20:52:27
Conditional 3rd for Bozak (becomes a 2nd if they make the conference finals). something like that


 

 

 

cx's banter posts with other poster's replies to cx's banter posts

 

22 Jul 2015 22:48:32
what do u guys think the canucks should do? what trades? and what can they get for hamhuis

cx

1.) 23 Jul 2015 13:03:34
Late 1st and prospect for Hamhius.


2.) 23 Jul 2015 14:00:03
Canucks are not looking like a great time for the upcoming season, if anything they took a step back. Also trade Vrbata @ Trade deadline and miller if you can find any takers. Need a top 10 pick (preferably top 5) & draft best Defenceman or Winger available.


 

 

 

cx's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

12 Aug 2015 06:31:48
@chirp I don't agree with you mc david and nugent hopkins take up 1st line and 2nd line so no need for draisaitl and they don't have many d prospects they could use another one

cx

 

 

Click To View This Thread

12 Aug 2015 05:56:43
edm has to add maybe nurse would help but canes vaule faulk and doubt they will part ways with him

cx

 

 

Click To View This Thread

12 Aug 2015 05:54:05
stars need to add

cx

 

 

Click To View This Thread

24 Jul 2015 07:39:32
3 1st round picks hahahaa habs say no

cx

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Jul 2015 20:22:45
that looks fair for both teams

cx

 

 

 

cx has no Banter Replies