Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts
marki444's Profile
No Profile Picture uploaded
marki444's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To marki444's Posts
To marki444's last 5 rumours posts
To marki444's last 5 banter posts
To marki444's last 5 rumour replies
marki444's rumours posts with other poster's replies to marki444's rumours posts
29 Mar 2018 14:54:16
Buf: O'Reilly
For
Mtl: Pacioretty, first 2018
1.) 29 Mar 2018 15:29:39
not trading our first lolll.
2.) 29 Mar 2018 19:53:33
Lol Mtl ain’t trading that 1st and if they are.
MB is getting a bit closer to Chiarelli who is still by far the wurst Gm.
25 Feb 2018 23:27:49
Flo: Bjugstad,Borgstrom,1st/2018
Mtl: Pacioretty,cond. 2nd/2020 (if he don't re-sign)
1.) 26 Feb 2018 00:52:17
No from Florida.
2.) 26 Feb 2018 01:03:13
Bjugstad is better and younger than pacioretty.
3.) 26 Feb 2018 02:29:39
He's not better. what the hell.
4.) 26 Feb 2018 12:38:04
No said is Bjjisatd better then Patches. he's a second line center at most and on a lot of team 4 line (Pitts, Win, Edm ect) while Patches sis first line on most team and at least second o the really strong teams.
16 Feb 2018 16:47:35
Mtl:Pacioretty,Plekanec,Lehkonen, 2nd/2018 (Washington)
Flo:Bjugstad,Borgstrom,1st/2018(draft protect) become 1st/2019 (non-protect)
1.) 16 Feb 2018 16:53:23
Nice try. Florida isn't trading their 1st for one year of Pacioretty.
2.) 16 Feb 2018 19:24:44
-Its so easy to sign Pacioretty right away (~7,5m/ 5-6 years) . He's going to be in love with Florida after all the big pressure of Mtl.
-Plekanec would be a realy nice addition as a third line center with experience but also realy good for defensive mission like 5 on 4.
-Lehkonen have a good potential. He's a realy good two way player with a good wrist shot.
-------
-Bjugstad is a big center, still young who score around 20-25 goals. But never develop as he was suppose to.
-Borgstrom is the big piece of that trade. He have a lot of potential, he have good hand and he's able to score but still he proved nothing yet in the Nhl.
-The first choice with the second 2018 Florida receive is nothing for Pacioretty. The only piece Florida lose in the line up is Bjugstad.
And look at the Florida lines.
Huberdeau-Barkov-Dadonov
Pacioretty-Trocheck-Malgin
Mccann-Plekanec-Lehkonen
Mcginn-Mackenzie-Sceviour
-Look realy good for the final push and next years! No?
-Mtl have what they crucialy need, depth at the center position.
3.) 16 Feb 2018 19:49:09
I want Montreal to keep lehkonen. He’s got lots of potential just hasn’t been able to find a groove with injuries and the lack of offensive centers.
4.) 16 Feb 2018 20:23:37
I agree! But you have to give if you went a good center and everybody know that Mtl need center, so.
Anyway mtl have a lot of wingers and I have more hope in Hudon or Sherback for there offensive potentiel than Lehkonen who's more defensive and need to improve offensive. Also Lehkonen have a better value I think.
14 Jan 2018 14:09:06
Pacioretty-Lekhonen-Benn-1st/2019
Vs
O'reilly-Guhle-Mittelstadt
1.) 14 Jan 2018 15:12:52
Lmaoo no way for buffalo. Stop with these bad trades heavily favouring the habs
2.) 14 Jan 2018 17:25:29
This is really really bad for Buffalo.
3.) 14 Jan 2018 18:13:39
Are you talking about who’d win in a 4 on 3 game? ( vs )
08 Nov 2017 11:36:21
Mtl: Pacioretty, Petry, Lindgren &
2nd/2020 if Ekman-Larsson resign
Vs
Arz: Ekman-Larsson, Demers &
2nd/2020 if Pacioretty resign
marki444's banter posts with other poster's replies to marki444's banter posts
14 Feb 2018 22:28:54
Buf: Mittelstadt,Guhle,1st 2018,Moulson (cap dump)
Mtl: Pacioretty(50%),Petry,Byron,2nd 2018
1.) 14 Feb 2018 22:40:27
Habs take that! lol
Buf does not though, not even close.
07 Nov 2017 02:22:20
Mtl: Pacioretty (4.5m/2018-19) UFA
Petry (5.5m/2020-21) UFA
Lindgren (0.7m/2017-18) RFA
2nd (2020/ if Ek.-L. sign)
vs
Arz: Ekman-Larsson (5.5m/2018-19)
Demers (3.94m/2020-21)
2nd (2020/ if Pacioretty sign)
1.) 07 Nov 2017 04:22:02
Absolutely not from arizona
2.) 07 Nov 2017 04:22:32
If i was Arizona i'd ask for Drouin + +
3.) 07 Nov 2017 20:54:09
Dream on.
13 Mar 2016 11:33:06
Agree or disagree? I firmly think that! Steven Stamkos's going to sign for 90m/ 8years with Montreal Canadiens.
Sorry Toronto fans ;)
1.) 13 Mar 2016 12:33:26
It's very possible. MTL is one of the few teams that need Stamkos and are in a position to justify paying for him.
Most Toronto fans have probably realized by now he's not signing in TO. And frankly I don't think the management wants him.
2.) 13 Mar 2016 14:00:50
Yeah he's a great player bur is he really worth more than 1/ 7 of your total salary? I wouldn't be mad if the leafs got him but would prefer if they just stayed the course with the rebuild.
3.) 13 Mar 2016 16:29:17
also by the way he can only sign 8 years with tampa
but i'm hoping he signs with detroit :3 Big Z passing the torch the Stammer.
4.) 13 Mar 2016 18:02:18
you lost all credibility (not that you had any anyway) when you said 8 years.
5.) 13 Mar 2016 19:02:53
It's a lot for one guy. We already have one guy in PK making like 9 million a year. To commit that much to another state going to be tough. . Eventually Price. Patches. . Galchenyuk are going to need new deals in next few years. Not have like 18 to 19 million tied In 2 guys for years will be tough. .
6.) 13 Mar 2016 21:13:21
Sosahabs true that look at the blackhawks spending 21 millions on 2 players they can not bring a good team together year after year. Wait.
7.) 13 Mar 2016 22:14:51
Indeed it's going to happens you know why because if we trade pleckaneck then Emelin and desharnais that 13 million out of the back
I could live with that Center line stemkos chucky danault and eller.
8.) 13 Mar 2016 22:15:23
Big z check you're trade.
9.) 13 Mar 2016 22:45:02
Toews and Kane at 20 million >> Stamkos and Subban at 20 million and not to mention they have Keith and Hossa signed to a very cap friendly number.
10.) 13 Mar 2016 23:07:28
I doubt it, just my opinion.
11.) 13 Mar 2016 23:07:59
well they only have had that this year, so claiming that they've done it year after year with that structure isn't really accurate at all.
Furthermore, a lot of things have to fall perfectly in line for them to be able to do so and. specifically, two things have allowed them to be dominant for what will likely be around a decade: their phenomenal drafting and a sequence of astute trades, and their sort of cap circumvention allowed by the last CBA with contracts to Keith and Hossa. Half of that formula is no longer allowed, so creating a dominant team like they have has been made significantly harder, especially so in the next few years while they and others are still benefiting from excellent play from those players with "cap circumventing" contracts.
12.) 14 Mar 2016 00:52:19
Its pretty cool that you firmly think that something that literally can not happen will happen.
13.) 14 Mar 2016 01:57:14
True, but. These also aren't the Blackhawks. . If Bergevin can pull it off, I'm all for it. . But, Price is up in a what 3 years? . Patches around the same time ( I'm not sure, just guessing. ) Galchenyuk looks like he's maybe going to be a 6 mil + guy. jus hope it all turns out. but hey. if he can do it and not mess with the core. go for it.
14.) 14 Mar 2016 01:58:53
Soso if kessel huge contract was move then we could probably move stamkos subban or patch if it come down to it.
15.) 14 Mar 2016 17:22:34
We can say everything we want, but at the end of the line, if stamkos wants to sign in mtl bergevin will find a way to fit him in the cap as any dg would do if stamkos would want to a team. Personnaly i think if signing stamkos means we can not resign pacio in 3 years then we will adress the situation in 3 years and hey if we need to let him go, i am ok with it, as ladd after 2010 with the blackhawks, You just can't say, well stamkos would have accepted to come in mtl but we think in 3 years when we will have to resign price and paciorrety, we won't be able to sign pacio so because of that we have not made an offer to stamkos.
16.) 14 Mar 2016 22:39:27
Well, then hope he pulls the trigger and gets it done. and. hopefully Stamkos can get back to being the player he was. he should be top 5 point guy every year.
17.) 15 Mar 2016 16:09:21
^ Pacioretty in 2019, Price in 2017, Galchenyuk in 2017. But you also lose Plekanec in 2018, Desharnais in 2017, Eller in 2018, Markov in 2017 and Emelin in 2018.
I think they can make it work. It likely means you aren't keeping certain guys around, but the space would be there.
18.) 16 Mar 2016 05:03:39
This is all just a semantics game because Bergevin doesn't have the balls to pull off anything near this big. Maybe if Stamkos was a bottom six forward Bergevin could pull it off.
16 Feb 2018 20:23:37
I agree! But you have to give if you went a good center and everybody know that Mtl need center, so.
Anyway mtl have a lot of wingers and I have more hope in Hudon or Sherback for there offensive potentiel than Lehkonen who's more defensive and need to improve offensive. Also Lehkonen have a better value I think.
16 Feb 2018 19:24:44
-Its so easy to sign Pacioretty right away (~7,5m/ 5-6 years) . He's going to be in love with Florida after all the big pressure of Mtl.
-Plekanec would be a realy nice addition as a third line center with experience but also realy good for defensive mission like 5 on 4.
-Lehkonen have a good potential. He's a realy good two way player with a good wrist shot.
-------
-Bjugstad is a big center, still young who score around 20-25 goals. But never develop as he was suppose to.
-Borgstrom is the big piece of that trade. He have a lot of potential, he have good hand and he's able to score but still he proved nothing yet in the Nhl.
-The first choice with the second 2018 Florida receive is nothing for Pacioretty. The only piece Florida lose in the line up is Bjugstad.
And look at the Florida lines.
Huberdeau-Barkov-Dadonov
Pacioretty-Trocheck-Malgin
Mccann-Plekanec-Lehkonen
Mcginn-Mackenzie-Sceviour
-Look realy good for the final push and next years! No?
-Mtl have what they crucialy need, depth at the center position.
25 Jan 2018 01:35:47
Bennett or Gaudreau. lolll.
25 Feb 2016 23:23:09
Where do you see a 3rd line center, ti-joe connaissant?
25 Feb 2016 21:26:07
First- You guys underrated Markov
Second- The goal for a team his to win the cup and it's not going to happen with this defence core, Sorry!
marki444 has no Banter Replies