NHL Rumors mobile
NHL Talk mobile
Post NHL rumors
Latest Montreal Canadiens Trade Rumors
18 Sep 2014 12:56:33
Mtl: Plekanec + 2 rnd 15 + 6 rnd 16
Mtl: Plekanec + Thrower + 2 rnd 15
Mtl: Eller + Thrower
Detroit won't trade Mantha unless galchenyuk's name is involved same goes for Columbus and Johansen.
MTL adds in all 3
18 Sep 2014 15:17:32
All 3 heavily favor MON
17 Sep 2014 19:47:01
Winnipeg said would ask a top 6 forward a prospect and a pick for kane
Mtl should offer Plekanec-Tinordi-1st pick
Im a habs fan
Ill throw the same deal to Colombus for Johansen right
No deal from Winnipeg and Columbus. Plekanec is a good 2 way player who is on the decline, Tinordi is a slow skater who can't shoot or pass the puck and a 1st who will be anywhere from 20 to 30th. Kane still has a lot of upside , Gallagher, Beaulieu and a 1st 2016 is more reasonable.
Pretty bad honestly
16 Sep 2014 19:21:40
Edm: Plekanec Bourque, Beauliou or Tinordi
Mtl: Eberle 3rd
hall rnh yak
perron pleks bourque
pouliot arcobollo purcell
hendricks gordon lander
pax des gallager
prust gal ebs
sekac eller pa
moen manny wiese
Not enough from MTL.
Ebs would play first line IMO
U can't trade me for that!
17 Sep 2014 04:30:40
Prust on the second line is laughable.
Oilers could use Plekanec and Habs can keep the rest (Oilers are flooded with d prospects and just brought in Pouliot and Purcell so they don't need the up-and-down Bourque). But Plekanec won't get you Eberle so this trade idea needs a lot of tweaking, to say the least.
16 Sep 2014 06:04:23
Idek why but it seems people hate 3 way trades but sometimes they make it easier to trade high end players.
Montreal gets Nazem Kadri, and conditional pick in 2016 from WSH
Washington gets Tomas Plekanec or DD and a 2nd from Toronto
Toronto gets Mike Green and 3rd from WSH, Lars Eller and Juri Sekac
Obviously I'm a Habs fan but I tried to make this as unbiased as possible value wise. Montreal giving 3 players to get one seems like a lot but we would have 3 top 9 centres still just have a whole on wing that a prospect could maybe fill.
Washington clearly plays as a helping hand to Montreal and ideally that seems like no one would do it but it does help them getting a second line shut down centre or second unit Powerplay centre plus a pick.
Toronto gets a veteran who has lost a step but can help them out IMO at least. Lars Eller adds them centre depth and also get some nhl ready prospects ( Sekac questionable but Patryn could be a 6th or extra this year if they trade Franson at the deadline.
Idk if cap works it's just more a value for value trade lol.
Washington declines, doesn't get enough for Green
No way from T.O
Toronto gets the best deal IMO. Then Washington, then Montreal.
So montreal gives up Plekanec, Eller, Sekac and a 2nd for Kadri.
No way from habs.
Habs win the Sekac lottery and then trade him in a package for a player that really wouldn't help them all that much? Yeah, no.
16 Sep 2014 05:55:49
This trade won't happen I just wanna hear your thoughts
Habs trade Pacioretty
Leafs trade JVR
Who would have to add?
Sorry has jvr scored 39 goals? They do have similar injury problems. But I don't see them making this deal for more obvious reasons. The value isn't substantially off though.
Montreal. Big time.
16 Sep 2014 13:57:14
Both say no, this trade has no point for anyone
At this point it may be a straight swap.
16 Sep 2014 17:58:26
Read the post draisaitl_94, he clearly said the trade will never happen, just wanted to know if the the value was correct. Don't have to bash everything
Leafs would need to add a 2nd
17 Sep 2014 17:36:18
Btw I think noone adds, pretty equal.
If it would be my choice, I'd go JVR
Fairly equal, but if anyone has to add I'd say montreal , only because Pacioretty has more moments where he seems invisible.
14 Sep 2014 20:03:10
Keep hearing Kane may get traded
Mtl: fucale, plekanec, lehkonen, pateryn, 2nd
Kane might get traded? You don't say!
Not for garbage
Yeah, not for leaf garbage
Kane and a 3rd for Pacioretty, Tokarski, Tinordi and a 5th?
IMO the Jets will look to land 1) a good young player or a 2nd pairing left handed dman 2) an established forward on the RW and 3) a 1st round pick.
Patches is 10 times better than Kane will ever become.
Where are there Leafs in this trade?
14 Sep 2014 17:12:14
Nyi: Grabner, 2nd
Mtl gets a good scoring RW. Nyi gets a young tall dfd wich they don't have.
Paccioretty Dd Grabner
Tinordi isn't worth grabner let alone a second. Josh Gorges and Jason Garrison got 2nd's. Tinordi's not even established yet so how can you give him a second let alone grabner with him?
I agree tinordi is not worth grabner and a second,but the only reason garrison and gorges got traded for second round picks, is that the canucks and canadiens were looking for cap relief and wanted to dump salary.
Tinordi and beaulieu are off limits
Why stop at grabner and a 2nd? Go for Tavares, Okposo & the 1st too.
13 Sep 2014 18:42:48
Buffalo – Chris Stewart ($4,100,000/1 yr retain 50%) & Sean Malone
Montreal – David Desharnais ($3,500,000/3 yr). MTL reduces it cap by $1,450,000
Habs would have to throw in a 2nd if that much salary is being retained on Stewart
And exactly what is the benefit to Buffalo here? No deal.
Stewarts contract isn't going to be retained because he's in his contract year. Buffalo has no use for DD
No way desharnais gets you stewart alone.
OK! BUF needs a center and MTL needs a RW or this just a very bad trade. Why is this trade unbelievable? Who needs to add? Below there is a trade of Stewart to PIT, is that one better?
Stewart > DD
Buffalo really has no use for DD at this point. DD is an example of Bozak (I am a Leafs fan btw). He plays 1st line minutes because he has chemistry with the top guys. If DD went to Buffalo he would be maybe 3rd line center. Hodgson and Ennis have 1-2 locked up and with Reinhart coming in there is really no point in aquiring him. I posted the Stewart to the Pens idea and here is why it makes more sense for Buffalo. Bennett still has room to grow and can play both sides. Stewart is in his contract year and may want out of Buffalo. Pens need a big power forward who can toss knucks, sauce pucks, and put a few in the back of the net.
13 Sep 2014 13:58:29
Habs get Kane and Byfuglien
Jjets get Tokarski, McCarron, Bournival, Eller and Beaulieu
So a backup goalie, 4th line OHLer, 3rd line center, 4th line winger and 3rd pairing dman
Kane and Buff
Quantity doesn't equal quality
13 Sep 2014 15:55:59
Keep adding, Mtl.
You don't trade 5 players for 2.
i know! that package wouldn't get you kanes skates! Start with beaulieu and only ask for one
5 young talented players for two problems. no thanks.
@habsfan22 , Montreal fans do
Leaffan, you're such a habs hater! Do u know what potential is? Is mcdavid worth the same as biz nasty because he plays in the ohl? Comment on leafs rumors but don't be biased. Those evaluations are blasphemous! Disagree all u like!
Haha five talented players is hilarious the youngest one in this trade (McCarron) is playing on a 4th line in the juniors, don't want to get into every player but this trade sucks. I hope you don't represent all habs fans.
17 people agree with leaffan and only 2 disagree. Even with potential factored in Montreal adds here. And he's right. Quantity does not equal quality and that's not being biased or blasphemous. It's the truth. Disagree all you like. Being a Hab fan doesn't mean your players are worth gold as most of you seem to believe.
Hockeygodsgift, never said they where worth gold I'm just saying that he undervalued every player he listed! He is a habs hater and it's not like you have a star studded reputation on this site either. I am known throughout this site to be one of the more unbiased fans and look at things very closely. Leaffan has been known to continuasly value montreals players poorly.
He undervalued no one in this case. Its going to be quite a while before any of those players surpass those roles if they ever do. And I never said I was perfect, but you thinking you show less bias doesn't make you any more reputable either, not to knock you off that pedestal you seem to be perched on.
Soobydoo, if you think this is a fair trade then you know nothing about hockey , how about trading Galchenyuk and Gallagher for Jensen , Corrado , Hansen , Markstrom and Lain.
Beaulieu can be 2nd pairing bt that's about the only value
Sorry I fail to recall where I said this trade was even close to fair. In terms of immediate impact leaffan is 100% correct! But for some of the players listed it is only a matter of time before they blossom. Steamer, with that last comment you should consider asking yourself the question "do I infact know anything about hockey?"
The difference is McDavid HAS potentialbut no one on your list will be more than a 3rd line player or 2nd pairing dman AT BEST
Ouch, soobydoo. Lol.
13 Sep 2014 03:26:13
Mtl- Emelin-bourque-1st pick 2015
Letang's Value hasn't gone down that much, and Dupuis was a good 2way forward before Sidney Crosby. Not enough for both. Also the first rounder is going to be a late one.
Why even add bourque, he sucks and nobody want him on their team.
12 Sep 2014 03:59:49
Montreal getting stronger and better.
EDM- Ellis & Moen & 4th 2016
LAK- Plekanec & 3rd 2015
Richards is the same height as Plekanec, and LA wants to keep him.
That's why they didn't buy him out.
I like the first one, I think the value is about right and the idea seems like a good fit for Montreal. I think a guy like gazdic would be great in Montreal . The second one isn't that great though.
11 Sep 2014 12:47:50
Montreal need to out Galchenyuk in center.
Mtl: Plekanec + Thrower+ 2
For a 6
For a 6 or 7 wathever
Trade Tokarski ( I don't know is value on the market)
Mtl: Bourque + 3
Sing Brodeur 1 yrs 1.5m
Way too much for Anthony Mantha. Moen for a 6th with retained salary. Habs don't need clifford.
Budaj has a better save percentage over the last 4 years then brodeur
Definatley not giving that up for Mantha. Thrower is going to be a tank in the NHL.
The second you mention Anthony Mantha's name to Ken Holland when talking trades, he will hang up the phone immediately.
Nova x 65
Why nova? Gms are always listening! Have you called him? Do you know from past experiences from when you where in trade conversation win ken holland?
I think nova is insinuating that Holland won't trade away Mantha , the same as montreal won't trade away galchenyuk.
11 Sep 2014 11:50:11
MON: Dustin Tokarski G, Rene Bourque LW & Davis Drewiske D
WAs: Joel Ward RW & Philip Grubauer G
No point for any team to do this. Montreal don't need more goalie prospects
11 Sep 2014 04:16:06
Montreal needs more scoring wingers and young ones
Tokarski 2 1st a 2nd lekhonen and McCarron
For evander Kane
Pacioretty desharnais parenteau
Galchenyuk plekanec Kane
Bourque Eller Gallagher
Prust malhorta wiese
Extra: sekac andrighetto de la rose
Extra: tinordi pâtéryn
Too much for Kane.
Tokarski is a backup and McCarron is a 4th line player on his OHL team last year plus late picks
11 Sep 2014 03:29:26
To Edmonton: Rene Bourque
To Montreal: Jesse Joensuu, 2015 4th (+2016 5th/6th if needed)
Montreal clears cap.
Oilers get a hitting forward and veteran which they need. Teams should be afraid of getting in our zone. Instead of just easily skating in. Mark Fayne, And Nikita Nikitin will help. Bourque will help. And he was born in Edmonton.
(Pretending no salary cap)
To Edmonton: Nick Grossman
To Phily: 6th,7th
To LA: 2015 5th
To Edmonton: Jeff Schultz
*Assuming Draisaitl makes it*
To Phily: Jeff Petry,2015 3rd, 2016 4th, 2016 6th.
To Edmonton: Brayden Coburn
To Winnipeg: Jordan Eberle
To Edmonton: Evander Kane
Sorry, I didn't finish the trade. Its Jordan Eberle AND a 2nd for Evander Kane
Don't think bourque can help edmonton's problems but all the other trades are reasonable , Kane for Eberle is an interesting thought.
@Streamer thanks for the feedback!
11 Sep 2014 00:20:53
Enough with moen, bring in someone over 6'3 and who can face off against guys like lucic and mclaren and too protect the young guns
It costs an average defence prospect for gazdic and clear up cap by trading moen
What ya think?
I don't think habs need enforcers nor do other teams need them. There's barely any place for them anymore.
10 Sep 2014 13:28:29
MTL: Eller Bournival Pateryn
23 unbelievable but no comments. MTL: Eller, Bournival & 1st for WPG: Kane. I think any trade for Kane needs to include a 1st.
Haha, Eller who had a horrible season last year and 2 nobody's for Kane(who has had a few problems, but is young and has a lot of experience and lots of upside)
How about this
Galchenyuk and a 1st 2016 or Del la Rose for Kane.
I wouldn't give up Glachenyuk straight up for Kane let alone adding more to it.
10 Sep 2014 04:36:57
MTL- Eller - 2nd pick 2015 Andrigheto or De laRosa
Hockey news post an article in july that sharp could enp up in mtl?
Montreal won't give up 3 young players for a player that has only four more good years. +it would put montreal over cap
Montreal includes their 1st in there too. Sharp is an 80 point player and that offer doesn't stand a farts chance in the wind.
From the other side this looks like Kruger, McNeil, and a 2nd for Subban
I wouldn't give up andrighetto or de la rose at this time.
Both gunna be solid NHL players.
90% chance they are both playing at NHL level by this season start or next seasons start
09 Sep 2014 18:30:08
E. Kane RW/C
A. Ladd LW
A. Galchenyuk C
J. Sekac C
09 Sep 2014 21:00:16
Kane > Galchenyuk
Ladd >>> Sekac
Not worth for winnipeg and u can't trade galchenyuk
No from Winnipeg. Ladd is the heart and soul and Kane should be their future
Neither team would do this but habs would add. I bet sekac won't top 30points
Not even close to enough from montreal. Galchenyuk is 21 and already injury prone and Sekac is virtually unknown at Nhl caliber.
That's an overpayment by wpg IMO.
Pretty sure mon has no where near enough cap as we'll
At this point I think galchenyuk will surpass Kane and become the better player in the future (1c>1lw) but at this point galchenyuk will be undervalued by everyone so Montreal would never trade him. The trade doesn't make sense for either team.
09 Sep 2014 04:50:38
MTL- Bourque Beaulieu
If in van I take this and run
09 Sep 2014 07:07:05
its sad to say, but you;d be adding to burrows to get bourque alone
Burrows had a bad year , but Van wouldn't have to add in a bourque and Burrows trade, bourque is a lazy player who gives little or no effort, Burrows plays with heart , he'll probably get 40 to 50 pts this season.
Is rather have Bourquea contract
09 Sep 2014 04:33:38
What's with all the Beaulieu and Bourque trades right now?
Not enough imo for Pomminville.
Not enough for Pomminville , doubt he'd want to go to Montreal after his buddy Vanek just left and signed with the wild.
Bourque is a lazy dude
Beaulieu is a moneyable player
hes overrated attitude problem
We need a top 6 forward who can play physical with plekanec
and I don't think our left d is strong at all
Emelin pretty bad last year
markov getting older
and Beaulieu or Tinordi
I hope Tinordi fill the expectation
Ppl continuasly make trades in which Montreal is giving up great potential for aging wingers that are supposed to "fill" the spot left in our top 6. Wait till the season starts and u can see what people like PA, sekac, and Bourque can do before u trade the farm. And gis1838 you have no clue on earth what you are talking about when it comes to hockey.
09 Sep 2014 03:40:24
Habs- bourque, lehkonen, Ellis, 3rd
Press- gaustad, stalberg
Why would montreal need another centre and a winger in a slump?
Also that's way too much for those players.
09 Sep 2014 03:34:35
Mtl: tokarski, lehkonen, pateryn, Ellis, 3rd
Great upstart goalie, solid young defensive prospects, a second round prospect and a mid pick
A bunch of players that won't ever play in the Nhl regularly for a potential franchise player with a very high ceiling. Edmonton would probably call block montreal after this.
Yakupov franchise player? Come on , khl player would be more appropriate for him
10 Sep 2014 02:32:27
Edm does not need prospects especially defensive prospects which they have a lot of they need legit admit nhl players
@Cd1 "potential" franchise player.
09 Sep 2014 03:29:11
Anyone for a late pick
Mtl: Bournival, Pateryn, Lehkonen, Ellis, 3rd
Col: mcginn, Siemens
Sign mike rupp
Clear up cap from moen
Trade nhl ready prospects, most of whom who are defencmen which Colorado needs, and a mid pick for a good 2nd/3rd line player and a defence prospect who has yet to shine
Then sign mike rupp to take moens spot on the 4th line and maybe recreate chemistry with prust like back in NY, where they were the most point producing 4th line in the league together that year
Ex: weaver, siemens(call up)
1st trade is fine
2nd is bad
Avs get 3 AHL defenceman which they don't need.
08 Sep 2014 23:53:56
According to a source Thornton will only accept a trade to a cup-contending team. These teams were stated as Los Angeles, Chicago, Anaheim, and St.Louis. Might have been one more team. Only western teams though, he wants to keep his family down south.
The only real fit within these clubs would be Chicago, but the trade would be interesting with Chicago's cap space.
Personally Thornton is staying put, due to the high cap hit, and lack of trade partners.
Marleau is the more likely to be traded. Boston looks like a fit, along with Montreal, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Vancouver, Tampa Bay and possibly the Maple Leafs. Marleau has many more possible destinations other than the ones I listed. Comment possible trade for Marleau?? Thanks guys
09 Sep 2014 17:38:12
for his production thornton doesn't have a big controct at all, its actually pretty good value. anyways, I hthink if one goes both will end up leaving, not to the same team, but in the same time period.
09 Sep 2014 19:56:31
Marleau to Van for Burrows, Shinkuruck, Markstrom and a 3rd.
Mtl- Eller 2nd pick2015 Moen
SJ- MArleau 35 with a 6. 666 3 year contract who choke in playoff
Eller can be a good 3rd line centerwith a potential of 40 to 50pts a years
And he clutch in playoff
We take no responsibility for the accuracy or otherwise of published nhl rumors
Copyright mobile.nhl-trade-rumors.com All Rights Reserved