NHL Rumors mobile

NHL Talk mobile

Post NHL rumors

Latest Montreal Canadiens Trade Rumors

18 Sep 2014 12:56:33
Mtl: Plekanec + 2 rnd 15 + 6 rnd 16

Det: Mantha

Or

Mtl: Plekanec + Thrower + 2 rnd 15

Cbj: Johansen

Or

Mtl: Eller + Thrower

Cbj: Johansen


Detroit won't trade Mantha unless galchenyuk's name is involved same goes for Columbus and Johansen.

steamer


MTL adds in all 3

HockeyGodsGift


18 Sep 2014 15:17:32
All 3 heavily favor MON

Draisaitl_94



 

 

17 Sep 2014 19:47:01
Winnipeg said would ask a top 6 forward a prospect and a pick for kane

Mtl should offer Plekanec-Tinordi-1st pick


Pacioretty-DD-Parenteau
Kane_Galchenyuk-Gallagher
Bournival-Eller-Bourque
Prust-Maholtra-Weise

Emelin-Subban
Markov-Gilbert
Beaulieu-Weaver
*Moen-bouillon

Im a habs fan

Ill throw the same deal to Colombus for Johansen right

gis1838


No deal from Winnipeg and Columbus. Plekanec is a good 2 way player who is on the decline, Tinordi is a slow skater who can't shoot or pass the puck and a 1st who will be anywhere from 20 to 30th. Kane still has a lot of upside , Gallagher, Beaulieu and a 1st 2016 is more reasonable.

steamer


Pretty bad honestly

Drownedfish



 

 

16 Sep 2014 19:21:40
Edm: Plekanec Bourque, Beauliou or Tinordi

Mtl: Eberle 3rd

hall rnh yak
perron pleks bourque
pouliot arcobollo purcell
hendricks gordon lander

pax des gallager
prust gal ebs
sekac eller pa
moen manny wiese
bournival

Thoughts? value?

qwerty93


Not enough from MTL.

Soobydoo


Ebs would play first line IMO

Cd1


U can't trade me for that!

Eberle14


17 Sep 2014 04:30:40
Prust on the second line is laughable.

Titties


Oilers could use Plekanec and Habs can keep the rest (Oilers are flooded with d prospects and just brought in Pouliot and Purcell so they don't need the up-and-down Bourque). But Plekanec won't get you Eberle so this trade idea needs a lot of tweaking, to say the least.

Chirp



 

 

16 Sep 2014 06:04:23
Idek why but it seems people hate 3 way trades but sometimes they make it easier to trade high end players.

Montreal gets Nazem Kadri, and conditional pick in 2016 from WSH

Washington gets Tomas Plekanec or DD and a 2nd from Toronto

Toronto gets Mike Green and 3rd from WSH, Lars Eller and Juri Sekac

Obviously I'm a Habs fan but I tried to make this as unbiased as possible value wise. Montreal giving 3 players to get one seems like a lot but we would have 3 top 9 centres still just have a whole on wing that a prospect could maybe fill.

Washington clearly plays as a helping hand to Montreal and ideally that seems like no one would do it but it does help them getting a second line shut down centre or second unit Powerplay centre plus a pick.

Toronto gets a veteran who has lost a step but can help them out IMO at least. Lars Eller adds them centre depth and also get some nhl ready prospects ( Sekac questionable but Patryn could be a 6th or extra this year if they trade Franson at the deadline.

Idk if cap works it's just more a value for value trade lol.

Walleedj


Washington declines, doesn't get enough for Green

tbay4life


No way from T.O

leaffan


Toronto gets the best deal IMO. Then Washington, then Montreal.

thejazz97


So montreal gives up Plekanec, Eller, Sekac and a 2nd for Kadri.

No way from habs.

Habfan2


Habs win the Sekac lottery and then trade him in a package for a player that really wouldn't help them all that much? Yeah, no.

Chirp



 

 

16 Sep 2014 05:55:49
This trade won't happen I just wanna hear your thoughts

Habs trade Pacioretty
Leafs trade JVR

Who would have to add?

Drownedfish


Sorry has jvr scored 39 goals? They do have similar injury problems. But I don't see them making this deal for more obvious reasons. The value isn't substantially off though.

Soobydoo


Montreal. Big time.

thejazz97


16 Sep 2014 13:57:14
Both say no, this trade has no point for anyone

Draisaitl_94


At this point it may be a straight swap.

THEGR81


16 Sep 2014 17:58:26
Read the post draisaitl_94, he clearly said the trade will never happen, just wanted to know if the the value was correct. Don't have to bash everything

Leafs_4_life


Leafs add.

Chirp


Leafs would need to add a 2nd

leaffan


17 Sep 2014 17:36:18
Lol.
Btw I think noone adds, pretty equal.
If it would be my choice, I'd go JVR

Draisaitl_94


Fairly equal, but if anyone has to add I'd say montreal , only because Pacioretty has more moments where he seems invisible.

steamer



 

 

14 Sep 2014 20:03:10
Keep hearing Kane may get traded

Mtl: fucale, plekanec, lehkonen, pateryn, 2nd

Win: Kane

Slug200


Kane might get traded? You don't say!

Stammer


Not for garbage

leaffan


Yeah, not for leaf garbage

habz13


Winnipeg declines.

steamer


Kane and a 3rd for Pacioretty, Tokarski, Tinordi and a 5th?

thejazz97


IMO the Jets will look to land 1) a good young player or a 2nd pairing left handed dman 2) an established forward on the RW and 3) a 1st round pick.

MG69


Patches is 10 times better than Kane will ever become.

habsfan22


Where are there Leafs in this trade?

leaffan



 

 

14 Sep 2014 17:12:14
Nyi: Grabner, 2nd
Mtl: Tinordi

Mtl gets a good scoring RW. Nyi gets a young tall dfd wich they don't have.

Paccioretty Dd Grabner


hamonic Dehaan
Tinordi Visnovsky

¿Thoughts?

DA BOSS8


Tinordi isn't worth grabner let alone a second. Josh Gorges and Jason Garrison got 2nd's. Tinordi's not even established yet so how can you give him a second let alone grabner with him?

habsfan22


I agree tinordi is not worth grabner and a second,but the only reason garrison and gorges got traded for second round picks, is that the canucks and canadiens were looking for cap relief and wanted to dump salary.

tbay4life


Tinordi and beaulieu are off limits

Slug200


Why stop at grabner and a 2nd? Go for Tavares, Okposo & the 1st too.

SuperUnbiasedFan



 

 

13 Sep 2014 18:42:48
Buffalo – Chris Stewart ($4,100,000/1 yr retain 50%) & Sean Malone
Montreal – David Desharnais ($3,500,000/3 yr). MTL reduces it cap by $1,450,000

stanleycup2019


Habs would have to throw in a 2nd if that much salary is being retained on Stewart

Charles Xavier


And exactly what is the benefit to Buffalo here? No deal.

Chirp


Stewarts contract isn't going to be retained because he's in his contract year. Buffalo has no use for DD

habsfan22


No way desharnais gets you stewart alone.

steamer


OK! BUF needs a center and MTL needs a RW or this just a very bad trade. Why is this trade unbelievable? Who needs to add? Below there is a trade of Stewart to PIT, is that one better?

stanleycup2019


Stewart > DD

Drownedfish


Buffalo really has no use for DD at this point. DD is an example of Bozak (I am a Leafs fan btw). He plays 1st line minutes because he has chemistry with the top guys. If DD went to Buffalo he would be maybe 3rd line center. Hodgson and Ennis have 1-2 locked up and with Reinhart coming in there is really no point in aquiring him. I posted the Stewart to the Pens idea and here is why it makes more sense for Buffalo. Bennett still has room to grow and can play both sides. Stewart is in his contract year and may want out of Buffalo. Pens need a big power forward who can toss knucks, sauce pucks, and put a few in the back of the net.

MG69



 

 

13 Sep 2014 13:58:29
Habs get Kane and Byfuglien
Jjets get Tokarski, McCarron, Bournival, Eller and Beaulieu

habz13


So a backup goalie, 4th line OHLer, 3rd line center, 4th line winger and 3rd pairing dman
for
Kane and Buff

Quantity doesn't equal quality

leaffan


13 Sep 2014 15:55:59
Keep adding, Mtl.

seabass2011


You don't trade 5 players for 2.

habsfan22


@habsfan22

i know! that package wouldn't get you kanes skates! Start with beaulieu and only ask for one

HabsFan3131


5 young talented players for two problems. no thanks.

jhamelin


@habsfan22 , Montreal fans do

Drownedfish


Leaffan, you're such a habs hater! Do u know what potential is? Is mcdavid worth the same as biz nasty because he plays in the ohl? Comment on leafs rumors but don't be biased. Those evaluations are blasphemous! Disagree all u like!

Soobydoo


Haha five talented players is hilarious the youngest one in this trade (McCarron) is playing on a 4th line in the juniors, don't want to get into every player but this trade sucks. I hope you don't represent all habs fans.

steamer


Soobydoo

17 people agree with leaffan and only 2 disagree. Even with potential factored in Montreal adds here. And he's right. Quantity does not equal quality and that's not being biased or blasphemous. It's the truth. Disagree all you like. Being a Hab fan doesn't mean your players are worth gold as most of you seem to believe.

HockeyGodsGift


Hockeygodsgift, never said they where worth gold I'm just saying that he undervalued every player he listed! He is a habs hater and it's not like you have a star studded reputation on this site either. I am known throughout this site to be one of the more unbiased fans and look at things very closely. Leaffan has been known to continuasly value montreals players poorly.

Soobydoo


He undervalued no one in this case. Its going to be quite a while before any of those players surpass those roles if they ever do. And I never said I was perfect, but you thinking you show less bias doesn't make you any more reputable either, not to knock you off that pedestal you seem to be perched on.

HockeyGodsGift


Soobydoo, if you think this is a fair trade then you know nothing about hockey , how about trading Galchenyuk and Gallagher for Jensen , Corrado , Hansen , Markstrom and Lain.

steamer


Beaulieu can be 2nd pairing bt that's about the only value

HabsFan3131


Sorry I fail to recall where I said this trade was even close to fair. In terms of immediate impact leaffan is 100% correct! But for some of the players listed it is only a matter of time before they blossom. Steamer, with that last comment you should consider asking yourself the question "do I infact know anything about hockey?"

Soobydoo


The difference is McDavid HAS potentialbut no one on your list will be more than a 3rd line player or 2nd pairing dman AT BEST

leaffan


Ouch, soobydoo. Lol.

steamer



 

 

13 Sep 2014 03:26:13
Mtl- Emelin-bourque-1st pick 2015

Pit-Dupuis-Letang

gis1838


Letang's Value hasn't gone down that much, and Dupuis was a good 2way forward before Sidney Crosby. Not enough for both. Also the first rounder is going to be a late one.

habsfan22


Why even add bourque, he sucks and nobody want him on their team.

steamer



 

 

12 Sep 2014 03:59:49
Montreal getting stronger and better.

MTL- Gazdic
EDM- Ellis & Moen & 4th 2016

MTL- M.Richards
LAK- Plekanec & 3rd 2015

Habfan2


Richards is the same height as Plekanec, and LA wants to keep him.

habsfan22


That's why they didn't buy him out.

habsfan22


I like the first one, I think the value is about right and the idea seems like a good fit for Montreal. I think a guy like gazdic would be great in Montreal . The second one isn't that great though.

piccante1



 

 

11 Sep 2014 12:47:50
Montreal need to out Galchenyuk in center.

Mtl: Plekanec + Thrower+ 2

Det: Mantha

Mtl: Budaj

For a 6


Mtl: Moen

For a 6 or 7 wathever

Trade Tokarski ( I don't know is value on the market)

Mtl: Bourque + 3

LA: Clifford

Sing Brodeur 1 yrs 1.5m


Way too much for Anthony Mantha. Moen for a 6th with retained salary. Habs don't need clifford.

habsfan22


Budaj has a better save percentage over the last 4 years then brodeur

Soobydoo


Definatley not giving that up for Mantha. Thrower is going to be a tank in the NHL.

Habfan2


The second you mention Anthony Mantha's name to Ken Holland when talking trades, he will hang up the phone immediately.

Nova x 65


Why nova? Gms are always listening! Have you called him? Do you know from past experiences from when you where in trade conversation win ken holland?

Soobydoo


I think nova is insinuating that Holland won't trade away Mantha , the same as montreal won't trade away galchenyuk.

steamer



 

 

11 Sep 2014 11:50:11
MON: Dustin Tokarski G, Rene Bourque LW & Davis Drewiske D

For

WAs: Joel Ward RW & Philip Grubauer G

VanCanucksFan22


No point for any team to do this. Montreal don't need more goalie prospects

Habfan2



 

 

11 Sep 2014 04:16:06
Montreal needs more scoring wingers and young ones

Tokarski 2 1st a 2nd lekhonen and McCarron
For evander Kane

Pacioretty desharnais parenteau
Galchenyuk plekanec Kane
Bourque Eller Gallagher
Prust malhorta wiese
Extra: sekac andrighetto de la rose

Subban Markov
Emelin Gilbert
Beaulieu weaver

Extra: tinordi pâtéryn

Price budaj

HockeyFan78


Too much for Kane.

habsfan22


Tokarski is a backup and McCarron is a 4th line player on his OHL team last year plus late picks

leaffan



 

 

11 Sep 2014 03:29:26
To Edmonton: Rene Bourque
To Montreal: Jesse Joensuu, 2015 4th (+2016 5th/6th if needed)

Montreal clears cap.
Oilers get a hitting forward and veteran which they need. Teams should be afraid of getting in our zone. Instead of just easily skating in. Mark Fayne, And Nikita Nikitin will help. Bourque will help. And he was born in Edmonton.


(Pretending no salary cap)
To Edmonton: Nick Grossman
To Phily: 6th,7th

To LA: 2015 5th
To Edmonton: Jeff Schultz

*Assuming Draisaitl makes it*

To Phily: Jeff Petry,2015 3rd, 2016 4th, 2016 6th.
To Edmonton: Brayden Coburn

To Winnipeg: Jordan Eberle
To Edmonton: Evander Kane

Oils2014


Sorry, I didn't finish the trade. Its Jordan Eberle AND a 2nd for Evander Kane

Oils2014


Don't think bourque can help edmonton's problems but all the other trades are reasonable , Kane for Eberle is an interesting thought.

steamer


@Streamer thanks for the feedback!

Oils2014



 

 

11 Sep 2014 00:20:53
Minor adjustment

Mtl:moen
Phx: 6th

Mtl: Ellis
Edm: gazdic

Enough with moen, bring in someone over 6'3 and who can face off against guys like lucic and mclaren and too protect the young guns

It costs an average defence prospect for gazdic and clear up cap by trading moen

What ya think?

piccante1


I don't think habs need enforcers nor do other teams need them. There's barely any place for them anymore.

habsfan22



 

 

10 Sep 2014 13:28:29
MTL: Eller Bournival Pateryn
WPG: Kane

leosa


23 unbelievable but no comments. MTL: Eller, Bournival & 1st for WPG: Kane. I think any trade for Kane needs to include a 1st.

stanleycup2019


Haha, Eller who had a horrible season last year and 2 nobody's for Kane(who has had a few problems, but is young and has a lot of experience and lots of upside)
How about this
Galchenyuk and a 1st 2016 or Del la Rose for Kane.

steamer


I wouldn't give up Glachenyuk straight up for Kane let alone adding more to it.

kgrave



 

 

10 Sep 2014 04:36:57
MTL- Eller - 2nd pick 2015 Andrigheto or De laRosa

CHI- Sharp


Hockey news post an article in july that sharp could enp up in mtl?

gis1838


Montreal won't give up 3 young players for a player that has only four more good years. +it would put montreal over cap

Habfan2


Montreal includes their 1st in there too. Sharp is an 80 point player and that offer doesn't stand a farts chance in the wind.

HockeyGodsGift


From the other side this looks like Kruger, McNeil, and a 2nd for Subban

HockeyGodsGift


I wouldn't give up andrighetto or de la rose at this time.

habsfan22


^agreed.

Both gunna be solid NHL players.

90% chance they are both playing at NHL level by this season start or next seasons start

Habfan2



 

 

09 Sep 2014 18:30:08
Montreal:
E. Kane RW/C
A. Ladd LW


Winnipeg:
A. Galchenyuk C
J. Sekac C

LesHabitants


09 Sep 2014 21:00:16
Why?
Kane > Galchenyuk
Ladd >>> Sekac

Draisaitl_94


Not enough.

habsfan22


Not worth for winnipeg and u can't trade galchenyuk

gis1838


No from Winnipeg. Ladd is the heart and soul and Kane should be their future

JF12


Neither team would do this but habs would add. I bet sekac won't top 30points

Drownedfish


Not even close to enough from montreal. Galchenyuk is 21 and already injury prone and Sekac is virtually unknown at Nhl caliber.

steamer


That's an overpayment by wpg IMO.
Pretty sure mon has no where near enough cap as we'll

Drgonzo


At this point I think galchenyuk will surpass Kane and become the better player in the future (1c>1lw) but at this point galchenyuk will be undervalued by everyone so Montreal would never trade him. The trade doesn't make sense for either team.

Soobydoo



 

 

09 Sep 2014 04:50:38
MTL- Bourque Beaulieu


VAN- Burrows

gis1838


If in van I take this and run

Drownedfish


09 Sep 2014 07:07:05
its sad to say, but you;d be adding to burrows to get bourque alone

Shankar


Burrows had a bad year , but Van wouldn't have to add in a bourque and Burrows trade, bourque is a lazy player who gives little or no effort, Burrows plays with heart , he'll probably get 40 to 50 pts this season.

steamer


Is rather have Bourquea contract

Habfan2



 

 

09 Sep 2014 04:33:38
MTL- Tokarski-Beaulieu-Bourque


MIN- Pomminville


galchenyuk-plekanec-pomminville
paciorrety-DD-Parenteau
Bournival-Eller-Gallagher
prust-malholtra-weise

gis1838


What's with all the Beaulieu and Bourque trades right now?

habsfan22


Not enough imo for Pomminville.

habsfan22


Not enough for Pomminville , doubt he'd want to go to Montreal after his buddy Vanek just left and signed with the wild.

steamer


Bourque is a lazy dude
Beaulieu is a moneyable player
hes overrated attitude problem

We need a top 6 forward who can play physical with plekanec

and I don't think our left d is strong at all

Emelin pretty bad last year
markov getting older
and Beaulieu or Tinordi
I hope Tinordi fill the expectation

gis1838


Ppl continuasly make trades in which Montreal is giving up great potential for aging wingers that are supposed to "fill" the spot left in our top 6. Wait till the season starts and u can see what people like PA, sekac, and Bourque can do before u trade the farm. And gis1838 you have no clue on earth what you are talking about when it comes to hockey.

Soobydoo



 

 

09 Sep 2014 03:40:24
Habs- bourque, lehkonen, Ellis, 3rd
Press- gaustad, stalberg

piccante1


Why would montreal need another centre and a winger in a slump?

habsfan22


Also that's way too much for those players.

habsfan22



 

 

09 Sep 2014 03:34:35
Mtl: tokarski, lehkonen, pateryn, Ellis, 3rd

Edm: yakupov

Great upstart goalie, solid young defensive prospects, a second round prospect and a mid pick

piccante1


A bunch of players that won't ever play in the Nhl regularly for a potential franchise player with a very high ceiling. Edmonton would probably call block montreal after this.

steamer


Yakupov franchise player? Come on , khl player would be more appropriate for him

Cd1


10 Sep 2014 02:32:27
Edm does not need prospects especially defensive prospects which they have a lot of they need legit admit nhl players

Eberle14


@Cd1 "potential" franchise player.

steamer



 

 

09 Sep 2014 03:29:11
Mtl: Moen
Anyone for a late pick

Mtl: Bournival, Pateryn, Lehkonen, Ellis, 3rd
Col: mcginn, Siemens

Sign mike rupp

Clear up cap from moen

Trade nhl ready prospects, most of whom who are defencmen which Colorado needs, and a mid pick for a good 2nd/3rd line player and a defence prospect who has yet to shine

Then sign mike rupp to take moens spot on the 4th line and maybe recreate chemistry with prust like back in NY, where they were the most point producing 4th line in the league together that year

Pacioretty-DD-Parenteau
Galchenyuk-Plekanec-Gallagher
Bourque-Eller-Mcginn
Prust-malhotra-rupp/Weise

Subban Markov
Gilbert emelin
Tinordi beaulieu
Ex: weaver, siemens(call up)

Thoughts please

Slug200


1st trade is fine
2nd is bad
Avs get 3 AHL defenceman which they don't need.

Drownedfish



 

 

08 Sep 2014 23:53:56
According to a source Thornton will only accept a trade to a cup-contending team. These teams were stated as Los Angeles, Chicago, Anaheim, and St.Louis. Might have been one more team. Only western teams though, he wants to keep his family down south.

The only real fit within these clubs would be Chicago, but the trade would be interesting with Chicago's cap space.

Personally Thornton is staying put, due to the high cap hit, and lack of trade partners.

Marleau is the more likely to be traded. Boston looks like a fit, along with Montreal, Pittsburgh, Dallas, Vancouver, Tampa Bay and possibly the Maple Leafs. Marleau has many more possible destinations other than the ones I listed. Comment possible trade for Marleau?? Thanks guys

JF12


09 Sep 2014 17:38:12
for his production thornton doesn't have a big controct at all, its actually pretty good value. anyways, I hthink if one goes both will end up leaving, not to the same team, but in the same time period.

Shankar


09 Sep 2014 19:56:31
Marleau to Van for Burrows, Shinkuruck, Markstrom and a 3rd.

Ace


Mtl- Eller 2nd pick2015 Moen

SJ- MArleau 35 with a 6. 666 3 year contract who choke in playoff

Eller can be a good 3rd line centerwith a potential of 40 to 50pts a years
And he clutch in playoff

gis1838



 

 

We take no responsibility for the accuracy or otherwise of published nhl rumors

Copyright mobile.nhl-trade-rumors.com All Rights Reserved

.