New York Rangers Rumours

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.


(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

17 Jan 2017 14:46:50
NYRangers Trade
RNash

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov
Leivo

Cap Space for the Rangers
RNash good Vet for the Young Players

Thoughts?

17 Jan 2017 16:21:18
Will they be able to afford Ladd and Girardi?

17 Jan 2017 16:45:34
No from either team. Toronto doenst need to give up their youth.

17 Jan 2017 20:22:47
The Leafs youth are as follows

Nhl Level
Matthews
Connor Brown
Marner
WNylander
Hyman
Rielly
CCarrick
Zaitsev

AHL Level
Leipsic
Kapanen
Timashov
TLindberg
ANielson
Dermott
Valiev
Bibeau

OHL Level
Bracco
Etc.

Plus all there Draft Picks and extra 2nd Rounder in 2017 and 2018.
So trading Soshnikov and Leivo doesn't destroy the future.
Please people let's get real here someone like RNash helps the young players and he is on the 3rd line with the Rangers.
This trade makes sense for both teams

17 Jan 2017 21:04:58
Soshnikov and leivo aren't going to be main pieces moving forward (they are depth players), so in that respect giving them up isn't going to hurt the team. not sure Nash is a great fit on this team though.

Either way I doubt NYR want to make a move like that. They are pushing for a cup and Nash is a better piece for a run

17 Jan 2017 21:35:53
There are better more cost effective veterans available than Nash. Get guys who are happy with 3rd and 4th line minutes. Besides for veterans, yhe leafs still have Bozak, JVR and Komorov.

17 Jan 2017 22:26:13
trading for Rick Nash! Really!
Lets face facts here. The leafs are not going to win a cup this year. The leafs stanley cup is making the playoffs. ( making the playoffs is still a long shot! ) Right now they are on a roll and winning some games. Trading any youth from the leafs for any old guy is pointless. If you trade for anything is to help you win the cup in the future. Right now the leafs should trade nobody. let the young kids play. let's see what they can do.
Unless some team offers a stud young player like McDavid. (which won't happen) let's continue with the REBUILD! Shanaplan baby!

14 Jan 2017 15:32:03
NYRangers Trade
RNash
3rd Round Pick 2017

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov

Thoughts?

14 Jan 2017 15:52:58
Where does Ladd fit in the leafs line up

15 Jan 2017 01:14:49
Are you bent?
Good god.

Pinball strikes again! Forever the prototypical deluded leafs fan.

15 Jan 2017 12:58:55
im not a Nash fan but seriously? Soshnikow for Nash? I wouldn't trade just the third round pick for Soshnikow.

Jimmy Jones would be proud of the koolaid drinking leaf fans.

15 Jan 2017 15:47:48
You were ok for a while chirp. Back to being a tool. I forgot pinball speaks for all leaf fans

10 Jan 2017 20:49:56
Avs:
Beauchemin, F
Grigorenko, M
Landeskog, G
Bourque, G
2017 4th round pick (NYR)


Habs:
Lindgren, C.
Juulsen, N.
Scherbak, N.
Plekanec, T.
Emelin, A.
Carr, D.
2017 1st round pick (MTL)
2018 2nd round pick (CHI)

10 Jan 2017 21:03:47
A 13 player trade.? Ya. that's going to happen.

10 Jan 2017 21:19:19
i see you. trying to slip Gabriel Landeskog in there where nobody can see him. AHA! caught red handed boris, guilty as charged.

oh yeah, and no from the Avalanche.

10 Jan 2017 21:57:33
Habs add Patches Gallagher Price

10 Jan 2017 23:22:48
no from mtl, what are you guys saying. Were basicly trading are future for Landy. Thus trade isn't going to happen so I'm not wroried but if it did Mtl would be the Oilers of the 2000's for the next ten year

10 Jan 2017 23:36:12
Top
My thoughts exactly!
Nice try GM Boris. lol

Ebs.
lol. That's right!

11 Jan 2017 04:29:29
To much from Montreal you'd need to compact the deal make it like a 1 for 1 or 2-1 or 3-1

11 Jan 2017 04:47:31
3 garbage prospects, garbage overpaid turtleneck wearing old man, a 3rd liner and a slow d man. Plus a 1st and a 2nd? For a superstar, good dman, a 4th liner, and a somewhat useful grigorenko, and a 4th? You're awful

12 Jan 2017 17:37:29
Ebsolutely right . lol

02 Jan 2017 08:47:33
DAL- Hemsky, Lindell, 2017 2nd
COL- Barrie

DET- Green, Mantha, 2017 2nd
COL- Barrie

EDM- Pouliot, Davidson, 2017 1st
COL- Barrie

NYR- Klein, Hayes, 2017 1st
COL- Barrie

PHI- Read, Manning, 2017 1st
COL- Barrie

TBL- Coburn, Namestnikov, 2017 2nd
COL- Barrie

A replacement D, salary and a pick for Barrie were the main targets. Thoughts?

02 Jan 2017 10:00:07
I like how Detroit has to give up green and mantha and a 2nd to get Barrie but Oilers only have to give up Pouliot, Davidson and a 1st? What is this

02 Jan 2017 10:59:36
To be honest the best one in my opinion is Detroit, because Colorado is clearly heading into a rebuild and that's the only trade that includes a young player in general, something which I'd assume Colorado would want. So all the old players probably don't look too intriguing to them. But that's just my thought on the players, with age being a big factor.

02 Jan 2017 12:20:01
Actually Ericsson instead of Green would make way more sense. Maybe drop the pick too?
Every trade has a relatively young player and a high pick.

02 Jan 2017 15:16:23
Wings say PFO.

02 Jan 2017 16:07:43
Mantha is actually turning pretty good. he's not a top line winger like projected but could develop into a good second liner that get 50-55 points a year.

02 Jan 2017 17:20:21
Hes only 22. he still might become a first liner.

02 Jan 2017 17:30:06
Edm trade cannot be executed until after the Vegas draft is completed as they already have their 3 protected D-men. They'd just end up losing Barrie at the draft rather than Davidson.

02 Jan 2017 21:21:59
They can protect Klefbom, Larsson, Barrie. They don't have to protect Nurse.

02 Jan 2017 22:09:34
No but they have to protect Sekera be sure of his NMC.

30 Dec 2016 19:22:14
Avs send: Duchene, Beauchemin, Gélinas, Siemens and 2017 4th round pick (NYR)
Habs send: Lehkonen, Juulsen, Scherbak, Plekanec, Emelin, Pateryn, 2017 1st round pick (MTL, 2017 2nd round pick (WSH)
& 2018 2nd round pick (CHI)

30 Dec 2016 19:55:40
No thanks from Habs. Were basically giving most of are best prospect's wich we don't have a lot in the first place, Lekonen who is going to stay in the top 6 and get better and possibly have an "A" on his shirt in the next year's, plus a first Rd pick and two seconds? Emelin and Pleks I don't mind getting rid ove that much but still way to much from mtl to get Dushene. This package looks like the kind of return a player like Mcdavid would get.

30 Dec 2016 19:58:48
If Mtl did this they would have no future literally even if you have me Mcdavid for all of this i'd say no.

30 Dec 2016 19:59:55
i have a montreal fan
i have drinks

ughhhhhhhh

boris bagel.

30 Dec 2016 21:07:46
What is that. like a 5 for 10 deal.? .
I have an idea. why not send Colorado to Montreal. and send Montreal to Colorado.? . except Habs get to keep Price. and Colorado gets to keep there goalies and Mackinnon. ?
Ya. sounds reduculous doesn't it.

28 Dec 2016 00:24:47
Oil: Russell

Rangers: 2nd round pick
OR
Lightning: 2nd round pick

I think both of these teams can benefit from Russell when they make the playoffs, as both are contenders I believe.

Even tho I love Russell on the oilers, I don't think he will get signed here and I think he should be a trade deadline deal. I think it'll be a smart move for Edmonton to get a pick for him as there is no way if Edmonton even makes the playoffs, they will go far.

28 Dec 2016 06:26:51
Maybe a 3rd if the oilers got really luck.

28 Dec 2016 06:32:08
Russell wants to be in Edmonton, and they are a better team with him in the lineup. He's not getting traded.

28 Dec 2016 07:12:32
Oilers are obviously and evidently better with him, but the thing is oilers can't afford to pay him to a big contract with his age. If Oilers lose Davidson, is sign Russell to a 2-3 year contract max. But right now I think it'll be wiser to get a pick outta him. Oilers have other players coming up in the lineup, they may not be better than him now, but he's not a long term solution.

28 Dec 2016 19:22:59
Also, he's not what the Oilers need. They need a rh pp player.

28 Dec 2016 21:54:46
He's been solid for edmonton but I agree with McJesus and he fetched a good return when Calgary traded him to dallas

29 Dec 2016 00:52:19
He's not worth much to tbh.

25 Dec 2016 02:19:58
I may be way way off on this, but I would really like to see Rick Nash on the oilers so:
To EDM- Rick Nash
To NYR- Klefbom, 2017 1st, Benoit Poliout
I know poliout has negative negative value but he did play well for New York before he signed with Edmonton so maybe add a 2nd rounder in 2018 or another prospect.

25 Dec 2016 09:23:56
Yeah sorry that's super bad for Edmonton. We have weak D already so you think we should trade our best one and a 1st round? No thanks.

22 Dec 2016 19:25:23
As of right now Anaheim is going to lose a pretty good player to Las Vegas. Assuming Bieksa doesn't waive his NMC.

If they protect 7 forwards - Fowler or Vatanen will have to be expose Becuase Bieksa will have to be protected.

If they Protect 4 D - Silfverberg or Rakell will have to be exposed.

Anaheim:
RHD - Sami Vatanen $4.88

New York Rangers:
LW - Chris Kreider $4.625

Anaheim Protects 7-3-1:

Getzlaf
Perry
Kesler
Rakell
Silfverberg
Kreider
Vermette/ Cogliano

Fowler
Lindholm
Bieksa

Gibson.

22 Dec 2016 19:53:58
Interesting but how does this affect the Rags - expansion draft wise?

22 Dec 2016 20:33:28
It affects because now they protect 3 D=Bieksa, Fowler, Lindholm so try protect their stars forwards (Getslav, Perry, Sil, Rakell, Ritchie, Kesler, ect) sp then they expose Josh Manson and he's probably going to be taken if he's expose because he's a decent top 4 D on a weak defense.

22 Dec 2016 22:36:18
Uhh ok doesn't answer my question at all but thanks and Getslav? Really? He's not Russian lol.

22 Dec 2016 22:36:18
Uhh ok doesn't answer my question at all but thanks and Getslav? Really? He's not Russian lol.

23 Dec 2016 06:29:39
Honestly, if I were Ducks GM, I'd let Silfverberg be exposed. And he'll probably get snatched up by Vegas too, but the D core in Anaheim is really solid and it would be rough to lose one of them. I like Silfverberg, but like the trade/ exposure options less.

Of course, this is all dependant upon Bieska and whether he waived his clause or not.

22 Dec 2016 07:09:44
Van- H.Sedin, D.Sedin
Nyr- Rick Nash, Marc Staal, Oscar Lindberg

22 Dec 2016 11:47:19
Do not need or want Marc Staal and his contract. Nash? Really? I guess for cap but no way. Btw many rangers fans would move Staal (or Girardi) for anything just to rid there contracts.

19 Dec 2016 21:48:37
Helps both teams, thoughts?

Tor - JVR

Nyr - pavel buchnevich, Brady Skjei.

19 Dec 2016 23:39:00
Tor could even pay 50% of JVR salary for end of contract and with that they could fit him on the current roster np.

20 Dec 2016 01:19:56
Doubt rangers trade him.

20 Dec 2016 02:08:30
No from rangers by far

18 Dec 2016 09:49:44
Canucks need a rebuild. It's time they take off with the Sedins. Unfortunately for them, the elite teams (CHI, SJS, PIT, NYR) lack the cap space to pull off a deal and/ or have enough scoring forwards which means they don’t need them. OTT seem to be a team in the middle that has both the cap space and can be competitive. Plus they could use the Sedins help to get far in the playoffs.

VAN: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin
OTT: Bobby Ryan, Curtis Lazar, Andrew Hammond, 2016 1st, 2017 2nd, + Prospects.

18 Dec 2016 12:16:57
Canucks have no need/ use/ want for Hammond but I'd do I'd as a Nucks fan. Doubt the twins could get a return like this unless we retain salary tho.

18 Dec 2016 13:40:27
You will not get that much for the Sedins. The owner loves Hank and Dan so he will not allow a trade anyways. The only hope for the Canucks is to win the draft. We need a legit centre who can replace Hank. I really like Horvat but don't think he's that guy.

18 Dec 2016 16:55:55
U got this off sportster

18 Dec 2016 22:34:21
Ryan's contract would be the salary you're taking back 7.25 the next 5 years. Hammonds contract is 1.35 for 2 more years.

19 Dec 2016 03:10:59
The 2016 draft has already happened.

04 Dec 2016 11:11:42
To Mon: Pirri
To NYR: 2nd, 3rd

To Mon: grandlund, errikson
To Van: Gallagher, 2nd, 3rd, hudon

To Mon: shattenkirk
To Stl: juulsen, 2nd (if Kirk resigns with Mon becomes 1st)

Patcheioretty-galchenyuk-radulov
Grandlund-pirri-errikson
Lethokin-plekanec-Shaw
Byron-Mitchell-deneaul

Shattenkirk-weber
Markov-petry
Bealieau-barbario

Thoughts?

04 Dec 2016 12:02:10
Pirri was a free agent so no.

04 Dec 2016 15:50:14
Gallagher is litteraly one of the most annoting players in the nhl nkt teading him man.

04 Dec 2016 16:23:29
First of all you Pirri is not a top 6 forward. Granlund would be center in the second line before Pirri. Granlund I good he hasn't played to his full potential but he's still just 24.This would make more sense Bud:

Mtl:Patches, Lindgreen, 1rd pick,2rd pick 2017,Julsson, Sherback

Min:Granlund, Eriksson Ek, Brodin, Haula

Min Don't have depth in goalies, they will losse forwards in expansion draft if they don't make a move (their going to protect 4 D. With that Mtl will have 7 forward worthy of not exposing plus a solid Top 4D In Brodin.

05 Dec 2016 00:33:05
The granlund and eriksson he has in the trade is VAN. Loui eriksson. The shattenkirk one isn't too bad but blues might want a bit more. But the habs are giving up too much in the other 2 trades. That eriksson contract is tough to take on. Habs could have had him if 6 months ago for just money, not losing Gallagher and 2 picks.

05 Dec 2016 17:57:21
If blues are going to give up shattenkirk think better for ward prospect and 1st pick no matter what.

06 Dec 2016 16:57:25
Blues will get a 1st plus a great prosepct or just keep shatty for another cup run. No need to trade unless it helps us. right now shatty has the third most points with 19 under burns and karlson. So his value is high. Also if blues do trade it will be because he is willing to resign with that team maximizing the return. If not cup run with shatty.

03 Dec 2016 02:02:05
CGY: Wideman, Chaisson
NYR: Nash.

03 Dec 2016 08:41:13
Not even close man rangers spit in your face.

03 Dec 2016 00:17:46
Nyr-Rick Nash
Cal- pottier klimchuck and 2nd.

03 Dec 2016 00:50:52
Jtijh you are not off to another planet with that trade. Your are only off to another country. Rick Nash has a contract of 7.8 million dollars . Cal can't afford him at that price because a the end of the season Gaudreau, Bennet ECT are going to need new contracts. The only way I see that trade happening is if NYork restrain at least 3 million of his contract. But if New York do that their going to want to have a good young prospect or a first round pick. This might be possible:

NYC:Nash (40℅restrain)

Cal:Kylington,2rd pick.

03 Dec 2016 02:36:41
Ok Nash for wideman and kylington.

03 Dec 2016 03:49:15
Value is ok but Radulov is on the right track (Gaudreau is already signed) Flames have $0 cap space. The only way the money works is the Rangers retaining 50% and taking a combination of Smid, Wideman and/ or Bouma. Those contacts aren't equal so adjust retention for the trade to be salary neutral.

Like I said value is fine maybe Flames add if Rangers retaining more than necessary.

13 Nov 2016 13:43:16
Rangers Trade
RNash
Girardi

Leafs Trade
Connor Brown
CCarrick
Lupul

For the Rangers it gives them more Cap Space to improve the Team through trades as well as gives them 2 younger players to build there future as well.

For the Leafs with all the young forwards they have on the team now plus Kapanen in the AHL who might be up this year and for sure next season, same as there Defence with Dermott, Valiev and Nielsen, adding a RNash and Girardi will help the young players develop plus Lupul is off the books.

Thoughts?

13 Nov 2016 14:45:01
Or they could just keep their young developing players and not aquire 2 aging players with highly overpriced and fairly lengthly contracts (i believe) .

13 Nov 2016 17:39:29
May sound stupid but no from leafs. We don't need guys who are old.

13 Nov 2016 20:29:39
and years ago nash said toronto was a joke fishbboul so get lost.

24 Oct 2016 21:30:47
Lateral move but what about;


PHI: Andrew MacDonald
NYR: Dan Girardi


Read an article saying how Adam Clendening is playing well, but coach Alain Vingeualt is benching him in favour of Girardi. Maybe throwing the pylon for another pylon shows Alain that Clendening is actually worthwhile of playing.

As for the trade, both players are basically garbage, have mirrored terrible contracts that run until 19/ 20, so maybe a change of scenery can do the best for both? I don't know.


Thoughts?

24 Oct 2016 22:07:01
But why? Adam Clendenning is trash at best.

25 Oct 2016 00:58:22
Yup he suck ^^.

09 Oct 2016 18:48:09
TBL: Condra
NJD: 6th Round Pick

NJ gets a depth forward and penalty killer.

TBL: Filppula (25% / 1.25 mil retained)
CAR: 2nd Round Pick (NYR)

Carolina could use some help up front. Filppula will definetly help even if he is declining a little bit.

Tampa clears 5 mil in cap space for Kucherov now and for Palat/ Johnson/ Drouin next year.

09 Oct 2016 19:57:42
Flipper is more like a cap dump than anything for TB right now. No from the Rangers.

09 Oct 2016 19:57:56
Sorry, no from Carolina 😂.

09 Oct 2016 21:06:43
Filppula definitely isn't a cap dump but he's not worth a 2nd.

09 Oct 2016 22:45:43
Filpulla is a cap dump. He sucks and invisible 90% of the time. And even when he's not invisible, he's still not good.

10 Oct 2016 07:32:04
BeeJay96 spoken like someome whose never watched him play. Filpulla is their go to faceoff guy and plays PP and PK. Also the core of their shutdown line. He isn't worth 5 mill but is more than a cap dump especially with 1.25 retained like what was suggested here.

10 Oct 2016 09:40:18
JBS, I don't watch Flipper that much so that's fair but I know you tend to be quite biased with the Lightning and overrate your players so I'm sticking with him as a cap dump. Yeah he's top 30 in Faceoffs and can kill a couple penalties but if you want to pay him 5 Million dollars for those 2 things and let Nikita Kucherov sit out then by all means go ahead. And 31 points playing on the Tampa Bay Lightning power play? Ouch
Also I couldn't see TB retaining on Flip if he's traded, just too add.

10 Oct 2016 15:25:55
If you think playing on the Tampa PP got you a lot of points then ya you have no idea what your talking about. Tampa PP was close to the bottom of the league last year despite what the players they have. I already said Filpulla isn't worth 5 mill but there is value in a guy that can play all situations anchor a shut down line and be the top faceoff guy for a team. I don't know how that's even debateable or biased since i admit he's not worth his money. This isn't David Clarkson or RJ Umberger here they can get more than the 6th or 7th youd usually get in a cap dump.

10 Oct 2016 21:18:21
Yeah the power play sucked because Flipper played on it lol good luck signing Kucherov and Palat/ Johnson/ Drouin/ Bishop next year while keeping the likes of your 5 million dollar 3rd line shut down face off guy.

02 Oct 2016 23:33:58
Knowing how bad new york rangers are with trades

NYR: Brady Skiej
EDM: Griffin Reinhart, Nail Yakupov, 2nd

They don't know reinhart is a bust ;)

03 Oct 2016 01:41:19
Are you just bored and you like to post 10+ stupid trades a day.

03 Oct 2016 02:16:31
Knowing how bad you are with trades, it isn't a surprise you've taken up the whole feed with dumb proposals. It's like you pick 2 random teams then select a couple random players from each team and throw it on a post.

03 Oct 2016 02:42:35
You are just horrible.

03 Oct 2016 02:48:13
Everyone knows yak and Reinhart are busts. No from Rangers.

03 Oct 2016 06:17:20
One Stiff Oiler hater^.

03 Oct 2016 06:43:51
Well considering Skiej and Reinhart have proven about the same thing and it doesn't fit any need for the Oil, no from them.

26 Sep 2016 00:43:12
Nyr: Trouba, Stuart, Dano, 3rd

Wpg: Mcdonagh, Klein.

26 Sep 2016 06:15:54
No way from Rangers.

24 Sep 2016 21:31:33
NYR: Miller, Halverson, 2018 1st rounder

Minnesota: Dumba, 2018 2nd rounder.

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass