New York Rangers Rumours

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.


(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

24 Feb 2017 01:52:58
To nyr: Johnny Oduya (50% retained)

To dal: Jesper Fast

21 Feb 2017 02:50:12
Bruins give - krug , mcquid, 3rd
Rangers give - Brady skjei

Bruins get- young big two way defender

Rangers get - combo of a offensive defender and defensive defender and high pick just in case those two players do t work out

PERSONALLY I don't KNOW IF THIS RANGERS PLAYER IS OFF LIMITS

18 Feb 2017 23:21:13
To NYR
Green

To Detroit
Nash

19 Feb 2017 00:07:43
Detroit does not have the cap space.

19 Feb 2017 00:44:36
They could make it work with their LTIR funds. 14.6m In four players. By they way it looks, Franzen and Vitale are the ones activated only.

19 Feb 2017 05:14:02
But in the long run they don't want Nash's contract.

16 feb 2017 23:20:14
bruins give - 3rd rounder - mcquid
rangers give- chris krieder

bruins get - big power forward who could be another milan lucic ( hitter / top scorer )

rangers get big defensive defender who can stick up for his team but needed and put the puck a few times here and there

let me know your thoughts if i should add or take away or if i'm way off don't be an ass about it

17 Feb 2017 02:07:17
Seems fair.

17 Feb 2017 03:57:05
Bruins add something of significance. Mcquaid is a warrior, I like how he plays but to get a top 6 power winger who can flat out fly and score, a third rounder doesn't cut it. Rangers can't trade one of their best 3 or 4 forwards for a guy to be a 5th D. Playing style fits both ways, but pick needs to be a 1st to make rangers think and even then I'm not sure.

17 Feb 2017 03:59:50
Boston already has David Backes to fill that role . theoretically.

17 Feb 2017 05:02:29
Rangers do not do this!

17 Feb 2017 06:55:46
Would be crazy to have a younger cheaper version I guess.

17 Feb 2017 09:00:42
Not even close.

17 Feb 2017 23:27:09
Jesus you guys underate kriender it would take a 1st and a prospect for the rangers to consider imo.

10 Feb 2017 15:10:15
3 Way Trade Proposal

NYRangers Trade
RNash (Tor)
Holden (Stl)
1st Round Pick 2017 (Stl)

St.Louis Trades
Shattenkirk (Nyr)

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov (Nyr)
Dermott (AHL)(Stl)


Trade Breakdown.

RNash, Holden, 1st Round Pick 2017
-Soshnikov, Shattenkirk

Shattenkirk
-Holden, Dermott, 1st Round Pick 2017

Soshnikov, Dermott
-RNash


Thoughts ?

10 Feb 2017 19:11:21
Not sure soshnikov is worth much.

10 Feb 2017 19:55:28
so Tornoto adds nothing and gets nash.

NY gets to drop much needed salary, get rid of a crap dman and a 2017 1st which is only value added in this trade

Blues give up the #1 trade rental target for Two crap picks which i have stated several times we do not need average d prospects.

This is a no from blues.

10 Feb 2017 21:05:38
tor will never never take nash he called tor a fishbowl so he can get lost.

10 Feb 2017 21:46:53
Pinball has pinballs bouncing around in his head. I've figured out the name!

08 Feb 2017 19:49:00
NYRangers Trade
MStaal
3rd Round Pick 2017

Toronto Trades
Hunwick
Polak

3rd Round Pick has to be included because of the Years left on MStaal's contract.

Thoughts ?

08 Feb 2017 21:44:33
Signed until 2021 at 5.7+ injury prone+ best days are likely behind him. I don't think this would be a smart move for TML.

08 Feb 2017 23:47:04
Nobody wants polar mmmkay.

09 Feb 2017 00:45:59
no from toronto, marc staal is good but i think as saul said, best days are likely behind him so not worth it.

07 Feb 2017 00:09:59
Mtl:Julsen

NYR:Storme

07 Feb 2017 00:40:15
McJesusHabs.?

07 Feb 2017 01:00:32
Ding Ding Ding We got a winner.

07 Feb 2017 01:30:11
Is that the NYI Strome or Coyotes Strome? NYR do not have a strome unless you are predicting they are taking the youngest one this draft, making this an off-season deal.

07 Feb 2017 02:58:56
No sorry I meant NYI u bad.

07 Feb 2017 03:14:12
Not horrible. Think Islanders may want a roster player for him.? . and why the name change.? .

07 Feb 2017 04:45:40
Good call Sosa. There can't be 2 people that think there's a Storme in the NHL.

07 Feb 2017 21:09:40
Habs pass bigly.

05 Feb 2017 00:02:48
To Rangers
Shattenkirk

To St-Louis
Nash
______________

To Pittsburgh
Vanek

To Detroit
Prow
2017 2nd

05 Feb 2017 01:41:47
I can't believe the NYR trade. Are you serious Le con? Shatty for a player of negative value because of his contract. i'd take Bobby Ryan before Nash to be honest.

05 Feb 2017 02:39:34
Like why do you say he's negative value. So many terms are thrown out way too much on this site. "Negative value" "bust" like no.

05 Feb 2017 05:04:06
Definite no from the Blues. He's going to end up going to NY, but I heard it's going to be J. T. Miller + a pick and d-man to get Shattenkirk.

04 Feb 2017 23:23:12
3 way Trade Proposal.

NYRangers Trade
RNash (Tor)
1st Round Pick 2017 (Stl)

St.Louis Trades
Shattenkirk (NYR)

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov (NYR)
Polak (Stl)

Trade Breakdown.

RNash, 1st Round Pick 2017
-Soshnikov, Shattenkirk

Shattenkirk
-Polak, 1st Round Pick 2017

Soshnikov, Polak
-RNash


Thoughts ?

04 Feb 2017 23:43:35
NYR gets Shatty for a late first rounder. Oh boy I'm sure Colt is going to be thrilled with that.

06 Feb 2017 03:53:20
That's a solid no your adding polaKS salary who will not make top8 of blues and on top you only have half of the price warranted for shatty

Price is 1st 2017 pick and a good to great prospect.

03 Feb 2017 16:41:33
After Expansion Draft

To St. Louis: Nylander
To Toronto: Parayko

*Blues trade Shattenkirk at the 2016-17 deadline to Boston or NY Rangers. If he re-signs with the Blues, thinking it will be $7.5M/ yr x 7yrs.

03 Feb 2017 17:25:29
You have to be kidding, right? Even if Nylander was worth Parayko (a young top 4 RHD with room to get better) STL is trading Shattenkirk to keep Parayko and give him more playing time. They won't lose both of them.

03 Feb 2017 19:22:01
Can't trade both shatty and para.

03 Feb 2017 19:32:58
Parayko is not for sale. Its funny i said he was the man last year and got berated here all the time. Now everyone knows how valuable this Guy is LOL.

by the way looked way better than Reilly is supposedly a better dman.

04 Feb 2017 03:20:52
Rielly is a good dman, so is parayko, yet very different. You're also comparing them in one game you watched, which was riellys first game after missing 7 with a high ankle sprain. Apples and oranges.

04 Feb 2017 03:56:42
I follow reilly a lot he is on my 2 of my fantasy teams and I have been folowing the three young guns of toronto. I know the combination of shannny babcock and good drafting has turned toronto around. They are a fun team to watch but reilly is not as good as parayko it's fact.

01 Feb 2017 08:03:31
CGY: Hathaway, Engelland, 3rd rounder
For
PIT: Fleury, 5th rounder

These teams have been in talks before the all-star break regarding getting Fleury moved.

CGY: Elliott, Stajan
For
WPG: Trouba, Stafford

Elliott was not the greatest fit in the Flames scheme. Them adding fleury leaves room to move a goalie, and with the Jets nets needing more stability this is a good go to. Draft picks may be thrown in there by both teams also.

WPG: Pavalec
For:
CBJ: 3rd rounder

Good insurance piece to back up Bobrovsky in the playoffs, and with an overflow of goalies Pavalec is the most moveable.

DAL: Sharp
For
TB: Bishop

The Stars goaltending is dwindling quickly. This trade may happen before the end of February my sources tell me.

STL: Shattenkirk
For
EDM: Russell, Benning, 2nd rounder

A top 3 defender for the Oilers to help solidify a future perennial playoff team.

DET: 3rd rounder
For
NYI: Halak

Detroit will be looking to add some veteran net presence with Howard on the shelf. Quick and easy pick up in Halak for them. Look for Howard to be waived and head to Philadelphia, Buffalo, Carolina or even Tampa Bay with the Wings retaining some salary.

ARI: Doan
For
NYR: 2nd rounder

Doan finally leaves his long term team in a Martin St. Louis style deal for the Rangers.

COL: Duschene
For
NSH: Wilson, Irwin, 1st rounder

The Predators add a highly skilled forward to help push themselves deep into the playoffs.

VAN: D. Sedin, H. Sedin
For
NJ: Zajac, Palmieri, 1st rounder

The twins will be moved to try and finally ignite the struggling Devil's offence. My sources say the Canucks have been in talks with Eastern Conference teams since last season about a trade of this magnitude, and now it looks like it may happen.

PIT: 2nd rounder
For
FLA: Jagr

The ageless Jagr is going home!

01 Feb 2017 10:13:54
Im fairly certain you have no perception of value what so ever

01 Feb 2017 15:06:30
Armstrong says hell to the no then politely hangs up the phone while laughing untill he has a stroke and the blues replace him as well.

01 Feb 2017 15:12:52
Wrong in so many ways.

01 Feb 2017 15:24:52
1. Calgary's capped out and can't take on Fleury's salary
2. Not a prayer, Calgary adds a player of actual value.
3. Feasible
4. Dallas already has a tandem of tenders and doesn't need a 3rd.
5. 2 Dmen for a Rental is too much and Edmonton does not have a 2nd
rounder in 2017.
6&7 Feasible
8. Not enough for Duschene
9. Cap is there for Jersey. But their not in the playoff race so
attaining old vets probably won't happen.
10. Wouldn't that be nice to see ol Jagr go home to Pitts. Fans
would love it!

01 Feb 2017 15:28:02
Not a single one of these is even close. Do you really want to be hated as much as the real Pierre?

01 Feb 2017 16:54:18
Carolina will get a big name out of Colorado.

01 Feb 2017 17:02:22
I stopped reading after those brutal Flames proposals. Not a chance Calgary gets those trades wow

01 Feb 2017 20:10:27
You must be the legit Pierre if you think this is good

01 Feb 2017 21:27:18
I loled at the NJ one, wouldn't trade any one of those pieces straight up for the 2 Sedins. They just don't fit what we are trying to build

02 Feb 2017 19:19:10
1. If I were Calgary I would jump at this one, however they will need to get r rid of Wideman, and find a #4 defensman.
2. Edmonton would do well to pick up Shattenkirk to solidify a week defence which has been their problem for years.
3. Not a Leafs fan but I would not trade anyone accept JVR, Shanni has them going in the right direction.
4. I believe there are a number of teams that need to do wh at Toronto (can't believe I am saying this) and Edmonton finally did, do a complete take down and start all over again. Calgary and Boston have done partial take downs and leaves them in the middle of the pack on draft day, you need to suffer short term pain for long term gain. What out for Toronto in a couple years!

08 Feb 2017 23:12:50
These are so far from possible, there is no thought process whatsoever.

08 Feb 2017 23:42:35
Hathaway and Engelland for Fluery? Who trades a legitimate starting goalie for two grinder/ fighters?

Trouba trade isn't even close. He is a legit top 4 defenseman that's only 22. Win has been holding out for a left handed D man of similar age and aren't going to do it for a thirty something average goalie and a top 9 forward.

Let me skip to the Devs trade. They are rebuilding, why would they trade a top 6 forward and a good 2nd line or great 3rd line center. For two 36 year olds on their decline. This wouldn't be a trade without the 1st, then you throw that in and it's a total joke.

25 Jan 2017 18:34:42
Rangers give- Ryan mcdonagh
Bruins give- mcquid - 2nd rounder and keven miller

Bruins get solid option for s shut down d man and shed mcquid

Rangers get a guy who gives zero fricks and will be a solid help to rangers d and if not they get a back up choice and high draft

25 Jan 2017 19:34:55
Not a chance!

The Rangers won't trade their captain!

25 Jan 2017 20:25:12
I don't think McDonough is labeled as a shut down dman lol

25 Jan 2017 20:52:48
Rangers say no. Bruins have to add for sure.

25 Jan 2017 22:57:38
McDonough is not a shut down dman and rangers have been clear that their intention is to have a more mobile blueline going forward. They want to rid themselves of the girardi and staal types and have more active D. As much as I am a fan of Mcquaid and think there's a place for him on almost any team, he might be less mobile than anyone they're trying to change.

26 Jan 2017 10:41:30
Bruins don't have to add because McDonagh is not getting traded. Nobody trades a defebsemen like that unless your name is Bob Gainey. Imagine if McDonagh would still be in mtl. Ahhh it's to painful

17 Jan 2017 14:46:50
NYRangers Trade
RNash

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov
Leivo

Cap Space for the Rangers
RNash good Vet for the Young Players

Thoughts?

17 Jan 2017 16:21:18
Will they be able to afford Ladd and Girardi?

17 Jan 2017 16:45:34
No from either team. Toronto doenst need to give up their youth.

17 Jan 2017 20:22:47
The Leafs youth are as follows

Nhl Level
Matthews
Connor Brown
Marner
WNylander
Hyman
Rielly
CCarrick
Zaitsev

AHL Level
Leipsic
Kapanen
Timashov
TLindberg
ANielson
Dermott
Valiev
Bibeau

OHL Level
Bracco
Etc.

Plus all there Draft Picks and extra 2nd Rounder in 2017 and 2018.
So trading Soshnikov and Leivo doesn't destroy the future.
Please people let's get real here someone like RNash helps the young players and he is on the 3rd line with the Rangers.
This trade makes sense for both teams

17 Jan 2017 21:04:58
Soshnikov and leivo aren't going to be main pieces moving forward (they are depth players), so in that respect giving them up isn't going to hurt the team. not sure Nash is a great fit on this team though.

Either way I doubt NYR want to make a move like that. They are pushing for a cup and Nash is a better piece for a run

17 Jan 2017 21:35:53
There are better more cost effective veterans available than Nash. Get guys who are happy with 3rd and 4th line minutes. Besides for veterans, yhe leafs still have Bozak, JVR and Komorov.

17 Jan 2017 22:26:13
trading for Rick Nash! Really!
Lets face facts here. The leafs are not going to win a cup this year. The leafs stanley cup is making the playoffs. ( making the playoffs is still a long shot! ) Right now they are on a roll and winning some games. Trading any youth from the leafs for any old guy is pointless. If you trade for anything is to help you win the cup in the future. Right now the leafs should trade nobody. let the young kids play. let's see what they can do.
Unless some team offers a stud young player like McDavid. (which won't happen) let's continue with the REBUILD! Shanaplan baby!

14 Jan 2017 15:32:03
NYRangers Trade
RNash
3rd Round Pick 2017

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov

Thoughts?

14 Jan 2017 15:52:58
Where does Ladd fit in the leafs line up

15 Jan 2017 01:14:49
Are you bent?
Good god.

Pinball strikes again! Forever the prototypical deluded leafs fan.

15 Jan 2017 12:58:55
im not a Nash fan but seriously? Soshnikow for Nash? I wouldn't trade just the third round pick for Soshnikow.

Jimmy Jones would be proud of the koolaid drinking leaf fans.

15 Jan 2017 15:47:48
You were ok for a while chirp. Back to being a tool. I forgot pinball speaks for all leaf fans

10 Jan 2017 20:49:56
Avs:
Beauchemin, F
Grigorenko, M
Landeskog, G
Bourque, G
2017 4th round pick (NYR)


Habs:
Lindgren, C.
Juulsen, N.
Scherbak, N.
Plekanec, T.
Emelin, A.
Carr, D.
2017 1st round pick (MTL)
2018 2nd round pick (CHI)

10 Jan 2017 21:03:47
A 13 player trade.? Ya. that's going to happen.

10 Jan 2017 21:19:19
i see you. trying to slip Gabriel Landeskog in there where nobody can see him. AHA! caught red handed boris, guilty as charged.

oh yeah, and no from the Avalanche.

10 Jan 2017 21:57:33
Habs add Patches Gallagher Price

10 Jan 2017 23:22:48
no from mtl, what are you guys saying. Were basicly trading are future for Landy. Thus trade isn't going to happen so I'm not wroried but if it did Mtl would be the Oilers of the 2000's for the next ten year

10 Jan 2017 23:36:12
Top
My thoughts exactly!
Nice try GM Boris. lol

Ebs.
lol. That's right!

11 Jan 2017 04:29:29
To much from Montreal you'd need to compact the deal make it like a 1 for 1 or 2-1 or 3-1

11 Jan 2017 04:47:31
3 garbage prospects, garbage overpaid turtleneck wearing old man, a 3rd liner and a slow d man. Plus a 1st and a 2nd? For a superstar, good dman, a 4th liner, and a somewhat useful grigorenko, and a 4th? You're awful

12 Jan 2017 17:37:29
Ebsolutely right . lol

02 Jan 2017 08:47:33
DAL- Hemsky, Lindell, 2017 2nd
COL- Barrie

DET- Green, Mantha, 2017 2nd
COL- Barrie

EDM- Pouliot, Davidson, 2017 1st
COL- Barrie

NYR- Klein, Hayes, 2017 1st
COL- Barrie

PHI- Read, Manning, 2017 1st
COL- Barrie

TBL- Coburn, Namestnikov, 2017 2nd
COL- Barrie

A replacement D, salary and a pick for Barrie were the main targets. Thoughts?

02 Jan 2017 10:00:07
I like how Detroit has to give up green and mantha and a 2nd to get Barrie but Oilers only have to give up Pouliot, Davidson and a 1st? What is this

02 Jan 2017 10:59:36
To be honest the best one in my opinion is Detroit, because Colorado is clearly heading into a rebuild and that's the only trade that includes a young player in general, something which I'd assume Colorado would want. So all the old players probably don't look too intriguing to them. But that's just my thought on the players, with age being a big factor.

02 Jan 2017 12:20:01
Actually Ericsson instead of Green would make way more sense. Maybe drop the pick too?
Every trade has a relatively young player and a high pick.

02 Jan 2017 15:16:23
Wings say PFO.

02 Jan 2017 16:07:43
Mantha is actually turning pretty good. he's not a top line winger like projected but could develop into a good second liner that get 50-55 points a year.

02 Jan 2017 17:20:21
Hes only 22. he still might become a first liner.

02 Jan 2017 17:30:06
Edm trade cannot be executed until after the Vegas draft is completed as they already have their 3 protected D-men. They'd just end up losing Barrie at the draft rather than Davidson.

02 Jan 2017 21:21:59
They can protect Klefbom, Larsson, Barrie. They don't have to protect Nurse.

02 Jan 2017 22:09:34
No but they have to protect Sekera be sure of his NMC.

30 Dec 2016 19:22:14
Avs send: Duchene, Beauchemin, Gélinas, Siemens and 2017 4th round pick (NYR)
Habs send: Lehkonen, Juulsen, Scherbak, Plekanec, Emelin, Pateryn, 2017 1st round pick (MTL, 2017 2nd round pick (WSH)
& 2018 2nd round pick (CHI)

30 Dec 2016 19:55:40
No thanks from Habs. Were basically giving most of are best prospect's wich we don't have a lot in the first place, Lekonen who is going to stay in the top 6 and get better and possibly have an "A" on his shirt in the next year's, plus a first Rd pick and two seconds? Emelin and Pleks I don't mind getting rid ove that much but still way to much from mtl to get Dushene. This package looks like the kind of return a player like Mcdavid would get.

30 Dec 2016 19:58:48
If Mtl did this they would have no future literally even if you have me Mcdavid for all of this i'd say no.

30 Dec 2016 19:59:55
i have a montreal fan
i have drinks

ughhhhhhhh

boris bagel.

30 Dec 2016 21:07:46
What is that. like a 5 for 10 deal.? .
I have an idea. why not send Colorado to Montreal. and send Montreal to Colorado.? . except Habs get to keep Price. and Colorado gets to keep there goalies and Mackinnon. ?
Ya. sounds reduculous doesn't it.

28 Dec 2016 00:24:47
Oil: Russell

Rangers: 2nd round pick
OR
Lightning: 2nd round pick

I think both of these teams can benefit from Russell when they make the playoffs, as both are contenders I believe.

Even tho I love Russell on the oilers, I don't think he will get signed here and I think he should be a trade deadline deal. I think it'll be a smart move for Edmonton to get a pick for him as there is no way if Edmonton even makes the playoffs, they will go far.

28 Dec 2016 06:26:51
Maybe a 3rd if the oilers got really luck.

28 Dec 2016 06:32:08
Russell wants to be in Edmonton, and they are a better team with him in the lineup. He's not getting traded.

28 Dec 2016 07:12:32
Oilers are obviously and evidently better with him, but the thing is oilers can't afford to pay him to a big contract with his age. If Oilers lose Davidson, is sign Russell to a 2-3 year contract max. But right now I think it'll be wiser to get a pick outta him. Oilers have other players coming up in the lineup, they may not be better than him now, but he's not a long term solution.

28 Dec 2016 19:22:59
Also, he's not what the Oilers need. They need a rh pp player.

28 Dec 2016 21:54:46
He's been solid for edmonton but I agree with McJesus and he fetched a good return when Calgary traded him to dallas

29 Dec 2016 00:52:19
He's not worth much to tbh.

25 Dec 2016 02:19:58
I may be way way off on this, but I would really like to see Rick Nash on the oilers so:
To EDM- Rick Nash
To NYR- Klefbom, 2017 1st, Benoit Poliout
I know poliout has negative negative value but he did play well for New York before he signed with Edmonton so maybe add a 2nd rounder in 2018 or another prospect.

25 Dec 2016 09:23:56
Yeah sorry that's super bad for Edmonton. We have weak D already so you think we should trade our best one and a 1st round? No thanks.

22 Dec 2016 19:25:23
As of right now Anaheim is going to lose a pretty good player to Las Vegas. Assuming Bieksa doesn't waive his NMC.

If they protect 7 forwards - Fowler or Vatanen will have to be expose Becuase Bieksa will have to be protected.

If they Protect 4 D - Silfverberg or Rakell will have to be exposed.

Anaheim:
RHD - Sami Vatanen $4.88

New York Rangers:
LW - Chris Kreider $4.625

Anaheim Protects 7-3-1:

Getzlaf
Perry
Kesler
Rakell
Silfverberg
Kreider
Vermette/ Cogliano

Fowler
Lindholm
Bieksa

Gibson.

22 Dec 2016 19:53:58
Interesting but how does this affect the Rags - expansion draft wise?

22 Dec 2016 20:33:28
It affects because now they protect 3 D=Bieksa, Fowler, Lindholm so try protect their stars forwards (Getslav, Perry, Sil, Rakell, Ritchie, Kesler, ect) sp then they expose Josh Manson and he's probably going to be taken if he's expose because he's a decent top 4 D on a weak defense.

22 Dec 2016 22:36:18
Uhh ok doesn't answer my question at all but thanks and Getslav? Really? He's not Russian lol.

22 Dec 2016 22:36:18
Uhh ok doesn't answer my question at all but thanks and Getslav? Really? He's not Russian lol.

23 Dec 2016 06:29:39
Honestly, if I were Ducks GM, I'd let Silfverberg be exposed. And he'll probably get snatched up by Vegas too, but the D core in Anaheim is really solid and it would be rough to lose one of them. I like Silfverberg, but like the trade/ exposure options less.

Of course, this is all dependant upon Bieska and whether he waived his clause or not.

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass