New York Rangers Rumours

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.


(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

06 Mar 2017 18:52:56
Leafs: JVR and Bracco

Rangers: Kriender and Nash

Who adds? Helps rangers cap wise and give the leafs a new presance they could use with kriender and Nash.

06 Mar 2017 20:26:46
why would leafs want nash and his bad contract.

06 Mar 2017 20:47:33
Besides cap, makes no sense for rangers.

06 Mar 2017 21:14:58
It's Kreider* but no from Rangers.

06 Mar 2017 22:28:17
WE DON'T WANT NASH he said tor was a fishbowl so no way from tor.

28 Feb 2017 17:44:01
Wings: Smith

Rangers: 2nd + 3rd

Confirmed.

28 Feb 2017 18:11:09
So Happy as a Wings Fan! I was expecting only a 3rd maybe 2nd at best because of the market but both!

Great deal for my Red Wings! Let the fire sale commence! We're going to tank hopefully to get the highest pick possible.

Rangers do get an offensive gritty Dman which will definitely help. Good luck with the Rangers Smith!

28 Feb 2017 18:46:32
Awful move by the Rangers. Smith is not a good player.

28 Feb 2017 05:39:06
To SJ
Doan

To Arizona
2017 3rd
____________
To Rangers
Iginla

To Colorado
2017 4th
____________
To Toronto
Sheahan

To Detroit
2017 2nd (Conditional)
______________
To Montreal
Pouliot (20perc ret)

To Edmonton
2017 4th

28 Feb 2017 06:50:27
Doan and Iggy will get more then that.

28 Feb 2017 15:18:14
I can see Doan and Iggy being about right.

No comment on the Detroit player. never heard of him?

Undervaluation on Pouliot. No to retention and roster player back worth 2 - 4 mill required to attain him at the deadline.
Pfffft. paltry 4th in a weak draft for a top 6'er with term left. AND retention. hahahaha. NOT!

28 Feb 2017 16:52:14
Pouliot has never been a top 6 forward in his career and with that salary and horrible season he ain't worth even a 3 rounder. If retain I'd give maybe a 6 Rd pick but that's it.

28 Feb 2017 18:13:37
Sheahan would be lucky to get a 2nd. He has low value right now. Big body but hasn't been able to produce offensively.
Detroit would be lucky to get anything at this point but if he turns it around then her may be worth something. Young enough to have room to do so.

28 Feb 2017 05:30:24
To Rangers
Smith

To Detroit
2017 3rd

01 Mar 2017 07:29:46
Almost got that one right.

28 Feb 2017 00:01:35
Read that Pittsburgh and Washington are in a bidding war for Shattenkirk.
And that Washington is only in it to drive up the price for rivals Pittsburgh and NYR.

28 Feb 2017 02:22:16
Yeah mike commodore was saying that.

28 Feb 2017 02:38:59
Blues beat writer just said deal is done between blues caps waiting for details.

28 Feb 2017 02:43:54
Shattenkirk to Washington is already a done deal via multiple sources.

28 Feb 2017 02:53:28
Damnnnnnnnn Washington Wow.

28 Feb 2017 03:07:34
1st 2nd and a prospect.

28 Feb 2017 03:08:10
Zach Ranford, 1st 2017 and 2nd 2018 it's looking like.

26 Feb 2017 19:43:52
Cap trade.....Nash and Klein and picks/prospects to toronto for Laich and Greening.

Reasoning is both ranger players have another year remaining on there contracts totalling almost 11 million. Both leaf contracts expire this year and can be buried in the minors. Frees up cap space for the rangers to ultimately sign Shatty. Both Nash and Kleins contracts would expire before the leafs have to start paying there young players.

26 Feb 2017 20:16:07
That's literally two of their top players, for two ahl'ers. Don :/ come on man.

26 Feb 2017 21:08:02
MjC, yeah its a horribke trade, but Klein has played pretty damn bad this year. On of their top players? Not really, lmao. (I get what you mean tho dw)

26 Feb 2017 21:12:58
Klein has been benched recently and Nash is crippling there cap. They beed to dump salary to sign anyone. If klein is one of there best players they are in trouble.

26 Feb 2017 21:23:32
Oh yea. the rangers also have to resign zibanejad as well.

26 Feb 2017 23:37:35
I really would like to see what you guys think Nash at 7.8 mill this year and next is worth. He and Klein are the only remotely movable contracts on the team. And the only teams I can see who can absorb nash's contract are the leafs and the hurricanes as they have the cap room and are somewhat competitive.

27 Feb 2017 00:01:06
All I'm saying is rangers could get a way better offer. This is horrible return.

27 Feb 2017 00:56:41
I thought Klein was one of there best D? And I can't remember what his contract is but it's not bad as it? And if you want to use Oil fan logic then it's Nash and Klein for Shattenkirk and they don't get any of them for playoffs. Just a bad trade.

26 Feb 2017 18:20:48
So in my opinion shattenkirk wants to go to rangers. And i think they should pursue him now instead of in the off season in free agency so this won't be a rental trade.

Blues: Shattenkirk

Rangers: Miller + 1st + Skjei

Definitely fits what Blues want in return if he's not a rental. Just hopefully the cap would work out if he signed for 6mil.

26 Feb 2017 18:29:21
Sadly enough I think he might get more than $6M a year. He has said he wants to go to north eastern states basically. Boston, NYR and Philly are the teams I think he's after. The only way he gets more than $6M is if there is two teams that want him. If only one of those teams want him there isn't a "bidding war" then he might not get offered more. Will be interesting tho. I don't think he's worth $6M a year especially for 7 years.

26 Feb 2017 19:23:49
He's not going to Philly so rule the northeast team out. Flyers will be dumping defenseman, not trading for.

26 Feb 2017 19:30:04
Why is he not worth 6mil+ a year he is on pace for 57 points this year. That makes him top 5 in

Mcjesus I think you have made a fair offer for extended shatty.

26 Feb 2017 19:34:58
No from Rangers, we will just "steal" him as FA!

26 Feb 2017 19:40:31
I think that's too much and just overall not a smart move. I read Skej is playing well and is only going to get better. When's the last time a player got that kind of return? I just don't see it but you never know.

26 Feb 2017 21:38:32
Ebs did you see the return Larson got.

26 Feb 2017 23:11:20
Some executives have said Shattenkirk isn't even a top 4 because he is so bad 5on5 and defensively. I still think he is a second pairing myself, but isn't very good 5on5 or defensively at all. Yes he puts up points but still not worth $6M a year for 7 years. Maybe $6M sure, but for like 3 or 4 years. Not 5-7 years. $5M 6/ 7 years sure maybe. Not more than $6M for more than 5 years. But he will get it on the open market as most Top UFAs get overpaid as we know.

26 Feb 2017 23:18:57
For extended yeah that's a good offer, but shattenkirk should 100% not make more than 6mil. He's not an elite defender he's a one way power play specialist. If you look at defenseman making over 6mil they are all bonified all stars. Shattenkirk isn't. He's good but he's one dimensional. Some gms think he's a 4-5 dman. I don't agree but.

26 Feb 2017 05:11:34
To Pitts
R.Bourque

To Colorado
2017 6th
____________
To Montreal
Hanzal

To Arizona
2017 1st
2018 2nd(WSH)
_____________
To Rangers
Vanek

To Detroit
2017 1st
___________
To SJ
Vrabata

To Arizona
DeMelo
2017 2nd

26 Feb 2017 05:20:29
Don't think Pitt will do that
Arizona wants more
Good trade for rangers/ Detroit
Good for Arizona.

26 Feb 2017 19:44:20
No from Rangers, we need the prospects more than Vanek!

24 Feb 2017 01:52:58
To nyr: Johnny Oduya (50% retained)

To dal: Jesper Fast

21 Feb 2017 02:50:12
Bruins give - krug , mcquid, 3rd
Rangers give - Brady skjei

Bruins get- young big two way defender

Rangers get - combo of a offensive defender and defensive defender and high pick just in case those two players do t work out

PERSONALLY I don't KNOW IF THIS RANGERS PLAYER IS OFF LIMITS

18 Feb 2017 23:21:13
To NYR
Green

To Detroit
Nash

19 Feb 2017 00:07:43
Detroit does not have the cap space.

19 Feb 2017 00:44:36
They could make it work with their LTIR funds. 14.6m In four players. By they way it looks, Franzen and Vitale are the ones activated only.

19 Feb 2017 05:14:02
But in the long run they don't want Nash's contract.

16 feb 2017 23:20:14
bruins give - 3rd rounder - mcquid
rangers give- chris krieder

bruins get - big power forward who could be another milan lucic ( hitter / top scorer )

rangers get big defensive defender who can stick up for his team but needed and put the puck a few times here and there

let me know your thoughts if i should add or take away or if i'm way off don't be an ass about it

17 Feb 2017 02:07:17
Seems fair.

17 Feb 2017 03:57:05
Bruins add something of significance. Mcquaid is a warrior, I like how he plays but to get a top 6 power winger who can flat out fly and score, a third rounder doesn't cut it. Rangers can't trade one of their best 3 or 4 forwards for a guy to be a 5th D. Playing style fits both ways, but pick needs to be a 1st to make rangers think and even then I'm not sure.

17 Feb 2017 03:59:50
Boston already has David Backes to fill that role . theoretically.

17 Feb 2017 05:02:29
Rangers do not do this!

17 Feb 2017 06:55:46
Would be crazy to have a younger cheaper version I guess.

17 Feb 2017 09:00:42
Not even close.

17 Feb 2017 23:27:09
Jesus you guys underate kriender it would take a 1st and a prospect for the rangers to consider imo.

10 Feb 2017 15:10:15
3 Way Trade Proposal

NYRangers Trade
RNash (Tor)
Holden (Stl)
1st Round Pick 2017 (Stl)

St.Louis Trades
Shattenkirk (Nyr)

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov (Nyr)
Dermott (AHL)(Stl)


Trade Breakdown.

RNash, Holden, 1st Round Pick 2017
-Soshnikov, Shattenkirk

Shattenkirk
-Holden, Dermott, 1st Round Pick 2017

Soshnikov, Dermott
-RNash


Thoughts ?

10 Feb 2017 19:11:21
Not sure soshnikov is worth much.

10 Feb 2017 19:55:28
so Tornoto adds nothing and gets nash.

NY gets to drop much needed salary, get rid of a crap dman and a 2017 1st which is only value added in this trade

Blues give up the #1 trade rental target for Two crap picks which i have stated several times we do not need average d prospects.

This is a no from blues.

10 Feb 2017 21:05:38
tor will never never take nash he called tor a fishbowl so he can get lost.

10 Feb 2017 21:46:53
Pinball has pinballs bouncing around in his head. I've figured out the name!

08 Feb 2017 19:49:00
NYRangers Trade
MStaal
3rd Round Pick 2017

Toronto Trades
Hunwick
Polak

3rd Round Pick has to be included because of the Years left on MStaal's contract.

Thoughts ?

08 Feb 2017 21:44:33
Signed until 2021 at 5.7+ injury prone+ best days are likely behind him. I don't think this would be a smart move for TML.

08 Feb 2017 23:47:04
Nobody wants polar mmmkay.

09 Feb 2017 00:45:59
no from toronto, marc staal is good but i think as saul said, best days are likely behind him so not worth it.

07 Feb 2017 00:09:59
Mtl:Julsen

NYR:Storme

07 Feb 2017 00:40:15
McJesusHabs.?

07 Feb 2017 01:00:32
Ding Ding Ding We got a winner.

07 Feb 2017 01:30:11
Is that the NYI Strome or Coyotes Strome? NYR do not have a strome unless you are predicting they are taking the youngest one this draft, making this an off-season deal.

07 Feb 2017 02:58:56
No sorry I meant NYI u bad.

07 Feb 2017 03:14:12
Not horrible. Think Islanders may want a roster player for him.? . and why the name change.? .

07 Feb 2017 04:45:40
Good call Sosa. There can't be 2 people that think there's a Storme in the NHL.

07 Feb 2017 21:09:40
Habs pass bigly.

05 Feb 2017 00:02:48
To Rangers
Shattenkirk

To St-Louis
Nash
______________

To Pittsburgh
Vanek

To Detroit
Prow
2017 2nd

05 Feb 2017 01:41:47
I can't believe the NYR trade. Are you serious Le con? Shatty for a player of negative value because of his contract. i'd take Bobby Ryan before Nash to be honest.

05 Feb 2017 02:39:34
Like why do you say he's negative value. So many terms are thrown out way too much on this site. "Negative value" "bust" like no.

05 Feb 2017 05:04:06
Definite no from the Blues. He's going to end up going to NY, but I heard it's going to be J. T. Miller + a pick and d-man to get Shattenkirk.

04 Feb 2017 23:23:12
3 way Trade Proposal.

NYRangers Trade
RNash (Tor)
1st Round Pick 2017 (Stl)

St.Louis Trades
Shattenkirk (NYR)

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov (NYR)
Polak (Stl)

Trade Breakdown.

RNash, 1st Round Pick 2017
-Soshnikov, Shattenkirk

Shattenkirk
-Polak, 1st Round Pick 2017

Soshnikov, Polak
-RNash


Thoughts ?

04 Feb 2017 23:43:35
NYR gets Shatty for a late first rounder. Oh boy I'm sure Colt is going to be thrilled with that.

06 Feb 2017 03:53:20
That's a solid no your adding polaKS salary who will not make top8 of blues and on top you only have half of the price warranted for shatty

Price is 1st 2017 pick and a good to great prospect.

03 Feb 2017 16:41:33
After Expansion Draft

To St. Louis: Nylander
To Toronto: Parayko

*Blues trade Shattenkirk at the 2016-17 deadline to Boston or NY Rangers. If he re-signs with the Blues, thinking it will be $7.5M/ yr x 7yrs.

03 Feb 2017 17:25:29
You have to be kidding, right? Even if Nylander was worth Parayko (a young top 4 RHD with room to get better) STL is trading Shattenkirk to keep Parayko and give him more playing time. They won't lose both of them.

03 Feb 2017 19:22:01
Can't trade both shatty and para.

03 Feb 2017 19:32:58
Parayko is not for sale. Its funny i said he was the man last year and got berated here all the time. Now everyone knows how valuable this Guy is LOL.

by the way looked way better than Reilly is supposedly a better dman.

04 Feb 2017 03:20:52
Rielly is a good dman, so is parayko, yet very different. You're also comparing them in one game you watched, which was riellys first game after missing 7 with a high ankle sprain. Apples and oranges.

04 Feb 2017 03:56:42
I follow reilly a lot he is on my 2 of my fantasy teams and I have been folowing the three young guns of toronto. I know the combination of shannny babcock and good drafting has turned toronto around. They are a fun team to watch but reilly is not as good as parayko it's fact.

01 Feb 2017 08:03:31
CGY: Hathaway, Engelland, 3rd rounder
For
PIT: Fleury, 5th rounder

These teams have been in talks before the all-star break regarding getting Fleury moved.

CGY: Elliott, Stajan
For
WPG: Trouba, Stafford

Elliott was not the greatest fit in the Flames scheme. Them adding fleury leaves room to move a goalie, and with the Jets nets needing more stability this is a good go to. Draft picks may be thrown in there by both teams also.

WPG: Pavalec
For:
CBJ: 3rd rounder

Good insurance piece to back up Bobrovsky in the playoffs, and with an overflow of goalies Pavalec is the most moveable.

DAL: Sharp
For
TB: Bishop

The Stars goaltending is dwindling quickly. This trade may happen before the end of February my sources tell me.

STL: Shattenkirk
For
EDM: Russell, Benning, 2nd rounder

A top 3 defender for the Oilers to help solidify a future perennial playoff team.

DET: 3rd rounder
For
NYI: Halak

Detroit will be looking to add some veteran net presence with Howard on the shelf. Quick and easy pick up in Halak for them. Look for Howard to be waived and head to Philadelphia, Buffalo, Carolina or even Tampa Bay with the Wings retaining some salary.

ARI: Doan
For
NYR: 2nd rounder

Doan finally leaves his long term team in a Martin St. Louis style deal for the Rangers.

COL: Duschene
For
NSH: Wilson, Irwin, 1st rounder

The Predators add a highly skilled forward to help push themselves deep into the playoffs.

VAN: D. Sedin, H. Sedin
For
NJ: Zajac, Palmieri, 1st rounder

The twins will be moved to try and finally ignite the struggling Devil's offence. My sources say the Canucks have been in talks with Eastern Conference teams since last season about a trade of this magnitude, and now it looks like it may happen.

PIT: 2nd rounder
For
FLA: Jagr

The ageless Jagr is going home!

01 Feb 2017 10:13:54
Im fairly certain you have no perception of value what so ever

01 Feb 2017 15:06:30
Armstrong says hell to the no then politely hangs up the phone while laughing untill he has a stroke and the blues replace him as well.

01 Feb 2017 15:12:52
Wrong in so many ways.

01 Feb 2017 15:24:52
1. Calgary's capped out and can't take on Fleury's salary
2. Not a prayer, Calgary adds a player of actual value.
3. Feasible
4. Dallas already has a tandem of tenders and doesn't need a 3rd.
5. 2 Dmen for a Rental is too much and Edmonton does not have a 2nd
rounder in 2017.
6&7 Feasible
8. Not enough for Duschene
9. Cap is there for Jersey. But their not in the playoff race so
attaining old vets probably won't happen.
10. Wouldn't that be nice to see ol Jagr go home to Pitts. Fans
would love it!

01 Feb 2017 15:28:02
Not a single one of these is even close. Do you really want to be hated as much as the real Pierre?

01 Feb 2017 16:54:18
Carolina will get a big name out of Colorado.

01 Feb 2017 17:02:22
I stopped reading after those brutal Flames proposals. Not a chance Calgary gets those trades wow

01 Feb 2017 20:10:27
You must be the legit Pierre if you think this is good

01 Feb 2017 21:27:18
I loled at the NJ one, wouldn't trade any one of those pieces straight up for the 2 Sedins. They just don't fit what we are trying to build

02 Feb 2017 19:19:10
1. If I were Calgary I would jump at this one, however they will need to get r rid of Wideman, and find a #4 defensman.
2. Edmonton would do well to pick up Shattenkirk to solidify a week defence which has been their problem for years.
3. Not a Leafs fan but I would not trade anyone accept JVR, Shanni has them going in the right direction.
4. I believe there are a number of teams that need to do wh at Toronto (can't believe I am saying this) and Edmonton finally did, do a complete take down and start all over again. Calgary and Boston have done partial take downs and leaves them in the middle of the pack on draft day, you need to suffer short term pain for long term gain. What out for Toronto in a couple years!

08 Feb 2017 23:12:50
These are so far from possible, there is no thought process whatsoever.

08 Feb 2017 23:42:35
Hathaway and Engelland for Fluery? Who trades a legitimate starting goalie for two grinder/ fighters?

Trouba trade isn't even close. He is a legit top 4 defenseman that's only 22. Win has been holding out for a left handed D man of similar age and aren't going to do it for a thirty something average goalie and a top 9 forward.

Let me skip to the Devs trade. They are rebuilding, why would they trade a top 6 forward and a good 2nd line or great 3rd line center. For two 36 year olds on their decline. This wouldn't be a trade without the 1st, then you throw that in and it's a total joke.

25 Jan 2017 18:34:42
Rangers give- Ryan mcdonagh
Bruins give- mcquid - 2nd rounder and keven miller

Bruins get solid option for s shut down d man and shed mcquid

Rangers get a guy who gives zero fricks and will be a solid help to rangers d and if not they get a back up choice and high draft

25 Jan 2017 19:34:55
Not a chance!

The Rangers won't trade their captain!

25 Jan 2017 20:25:12
I don't think McDonough is labeled as a shut down dman lol

25 Jan 2017 20:52:48
Rangers say no. Bruins have to add for sure.

25 Jan 2017 22:57:38
McDonough is not a shut down dman and rangers have been clear that their intention is to have a more mobile blueline going forward. They want to rid themselves of the girardi and staal types and have more active D. As much as I am a fan of Mcquaid and think there's a place for him on almost any team, he might be less mobile than anyone they're trying to change.

26 Jan 2017 10:41:30
Bruins don't have to add because McDonagh is not getting traded. Nobody trades a defebsemen like that unless your name is Bob Gainey. Imagine if McDonagh would still be in mtl. Ahhh it's to painful

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass