Ottawa Senators Rumours


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

Correct Score Competition Entry

27 Mar 2017 04:24:20
MIN: Dumba

EDM: Ebs + 2nd
Ott: Ceci + Pageau.

27 Mar 2017 06:39:46
No from minny they don't need another center and no from Ottawa. In my opinion ottawa doesn't have great defense as a whole. Ceci should stay.

27 Mar 2017 12:15:57
Agree with McJ above. Minny has Granlund, Staal, Koivu, and a couple other guys like Coyle who can step in and play center.

And Ottawa is very thin on D, Ceci is barely a top 4 defender yet he's heavily leaned on for them.

27 Mar 2017 15:52:58

Oilers do not have a 2nd this year.

Both deals are a complete insult. Oilers quickly dismiss these 1 sided biased trades. You do not trade top 6 forwards for Dmen that are not even as good as the #6 and 7 that you have on the current roster!
Not well thought out at all with organizational suicide as the result for the Oilers.

To net these 2 TOP 6 FORWARDS Minni and Ottawa will have to give up Karlson and Suter in the package or these 2 do not change jerseys.

Counter offer by Oilers for the bottom 6 / Depth Dmen offered.

1. Sub Hendrix and Musil, in for RNH to get a #7 possibly #8 on the Oilers depth charts Dman in Dumba.

2. Keep Pageau, Sub Dillon Simpson, or Musil and 3rd round pick maybe for Eberle and you're in the ballpark for a #6 dman if he can beat out Benning and Gryba who are both playing better than Ceci right now for a lot less money.

Larsson, Klefbom, Sekera, Russel, Nurse, Benning >>> Ceci and Dumba

Ceci and Dumba would be lucky to beat out Gryba for the #7 spot on the roster.

Lol, Trade top 6'ers for depth D.
What you're suggesting is along the same lines of:

Johnathan Toews for Roman Polak

Patrick Kane for Philip Larson.

27 Mar 2017 16:31:52
Anyone else find it funny how some people are saying no from teams not named Edmonton. (Including an Oilers fan) but FT4A thinks this is a disgrace of an offer for Edmonton?

27 Mar 2017 17:14:59
Ft4a your evaluation of dumba is laughable. he is easily a second pairing defense on most teams (especially on oils porus d) get a grip on reality

27 Mar 2017 17:25:46
I find it funny that anyone could possibly think this is anything but a Complete 110% Joke. If there's an Oilers fan that thinks this is a good deal. Oil Nation needs to find him and ostracize him from Northern Alberta!

So. let's put this into world colored RED glasses perspective for you and I eagerly await your comment on the matter.

Trade proposed is equivalent to trading:
Monahan + 2nd for Dumba and Little J for Ceci and Pageau?

Is THAT a fair trade?

More perspective in case anyone doesn't fully understand.

Laine + 2nd and Scheiffle for Ceci and Dumba equivalent ( For peg fans )

Pacccoretti + 2nd and Galchenyk for Ceci and Dumba ( For habs fans )

Marner + 2nd and Matthews for Ceci and Dumba ( For Leafs fans )

There is no way in H. E. Double hockey sticks any of these teams trade their top 6 forwards for bottom 6 / depth defense.

So let's just stop being silly here and move onto something that has even a slight semblance of reality to it!

27 Mar 2017 17:50:19
I've honestly gotten so used to it by now it doesn't surprise me that he is comparing RNH to Toews and Eberle to Kane.

27 Mar 2017 17:52:41
Dumba would easily be a top 3 defenceman on blueline you imbecile not to mention RNH has struggled this year and is very injury prone.
Dumba > RNH.

27 Mar 2017 18:13:17
Incorrect. No comparison between Edmonton's top 6 forwards RNH and Eberle and Chicago's top 6 forwards Kane and Toews was made.

Kane and Toews >> Eberle and RNH for the record.

Comparison made to help Kaner88 put into perspective that top 6 forwards don't get traded for bottom 6/ 7 dmen.

27 Mar 2017 18:23:58
i love how no one can talk about RNH without having karlsson in the trade, but then ft4a can then try to compare marner and Matthews trade value to RNH and Eberle lol rediculous. Mcdavid is the only player on the oilers to compare in value to Matthews. Not saying Matthews is worth mcdavid, but chirelli would give up anyone else on that roster for him in a heart beat.

27 Mar 2017 20:03:40
Did you say RNH = Monahan and Johnny = Eberle? Lol.

27 Mar 2017 20:06:49
No Charles I'm sorry your talent assessment is incorrect.

Dumba would NOT take Sekera's, Russell's, Nurse's or even Bennings position on the current Edmonton roster.
Dumba would be the #7 dman on the current Oilers roster maybe even #8 behind Gryba who is the same calibre and type of player at 1/ 4 the cost.

RNH has played all the games this year, and has done exactly what McLelland has told him to do, which is play against the other teams top lines and neutralize them and let McD's line score. His unselfish buy into the coaches sytem is a very important part of the improvement in the standings by the Oilers this year.
Your assessment is obviously nothing but speculation based on past season's injuries, and not knowing much about RNH's role as defined by the coach.
Because of this. Mooooo = Charles's opinion on RNH.

Dumba's game is similar but probably a slight step down from Darnell at 3x the salary. Gryba plays hard mins just like Dumba with the same results at a fraction of the cost. Sorry no way he's a #3 on the current roster. You must be thinking of the 3 years ago Oilers.

Unbiased Jim.
RNH and Karlson's names only comes up when some dummy posts the Ceci for RNH unicorn land home of the easter bunny and tooth fairy type trade.

Edmonton MIGHT give up RNH for a #1 / #2 Dman (not named Dion Phaneuf. ) Since Karlson's the only player on Ottawa that fits the bill of a #1 / 2. That's why the names get linked. Trust me I'm more tired of countering Karlson's name when #6/ 7 Dman Ceci's name is offerd up for top 6 forward RNH than you are of seeing Karlson's name associated with RNH.

And. point 2.
Totally missing the point here bud.
Point is not to compare teams top 6 forwards to each other. . It was Would you trade YOUR top 6 forwards for a Dman that won't make the starting lineup?
YES or NO?

PC wouldn't give up Draisetl for Matthews, and Talbot might be a lock as well. The other players on the roster. yes he'd probably trade for Matthews.

27 Mar 2017 20:06:55
I'm sorry, but did you just say you did not compare RNH and Eberle to Toews and Kane. So these weren't your words above?

"What you're suggesting is along the same lines of:

Johnathan Toews for Roman Polak

Patrick Kane for Philip Larson"

26 Mar 2017 03:25:53
New Jersey: Kyle Palmieri
Ottawa: Ceci, 2017 2nd

24 Mar 2017 12:38:10
An interesting one:

-Adam Henrique
-Michael Cammalleri
-2017 2nd round pick

-Bobby Ryan
-Cody Ceci

I know there are a lot of sens fans on here but Henrique is a 50 point center and they get out of Bobby Ryan's awful contract

24 Mar 2017 13:26:19
So if Cammy and Ryan cancel, its Henrique + 2nd for Ceci.

No way from NJ.

24 Mar 2017 14:05:12
No body want Bobby Ryan unless Ottawa retains as much as allowed by the NHL.

Ceci is not worth anything other than a 3rd liner.

24 Mar 2017 14:41:20
Yea not a chance from NJ, Ceci is probably capped out at a number 4/ 5 defenseman despite what we had all hoped for him.

25 Mar 2017 01:08:45
Change Ceci with Chabot and it's fair.

25 Mar 2017 13:43:14
Lol no shot from NJ.

23 Mar 2017 18:21:41
Colarado: Duchene
Ottawa: Ceci, Chabot, 1st

I don't think ottawa would do it, they seem very high on chabot and ceci is still young and has potential to be a 2/ 3 defender. but i see this being their asking price for duchene.

Colorado: Landeskog
Chicago: Seabrook, Tuolla (i believe that's how you spell his name), 2nd


23 Mar 2017 19:43:26
As said above, Ottawa isn't giving away Chabot and Duchene isn't going to Ottawa unless he comes the other way so I think its a no deal.

Also, Seabrook is much too old for what Colorado wants, and he's going to start his decline quite soon, if he hasn't already.

23 Mar 2017 19:59:51
Both are absolutely horrible.

There's no chance OTT gives up that much for duchene. Sure, he's good, but he not worth that.

Then we have the total opposite. What is a rebuilding COL going to do with a 31-year-old Seabrook who is on a contract that is going to look pretty bad in a couple of years?

23 Mar 2017 22:52:39
i was thinking value wise. i really would love to see landy in chicago, but we'd need to give up a major player and shed salary. we have tuolla (however you spell his name) and only a couple other d prospects that are good. other than that who would we need to give up?

23 Mar 2017 23:06:21
If Ottawa won't give that up, then they aren't getting Duchene. Chabot or White will need to be included.

And that's horrible for Avs that's no where near what they want in return for their captain.

23 Mar 2017 18:16:01
Chicago: Hossa
Any team: 2nd round pick OR 3rd round pick

Chicago: Kruger
Ottawa: 4th.

23 Mar 2017 19:44:31
$3mil for a 4th liner is not something Ottawa (Melnyk) is willing to pay. I prefer Pageau and Smith over Kruger for the 3rd line centre role.

23 Mar 2017 02:33:20
Ottawa: Ceci, 2017 2nd, a prospect
Calgary: Gaudreau

U guys wanted a new trade idea here is a HYPOTHETICAL one. Gaudreau would be lethal with EK65 on the pp

23 Mar 2017 03:15:56
Really? Did you even think this through?

23 Mar 2017 09:13:58
Hey Boys don't be too rough on him, he is obviously delusional, can't tell right from wrong.

23 Mar 2017 13:50:35
Ceci would be the 5th or 6th best defender on Calgary. Treviling would laugh at this, and Burke would probably call out Dorion all over the media.

23 Mar 2017 15:11:55
Lol. This website is awesome.

23 Mar 2017 18:07:16
I dunno if that would even get Harvey the Hound.

23 Mar 2017 23:38:27
that might get you Gaudreau. Oh, not Johnny, what the? I mean Frederi Gaudreau of Nashville.

But yeah. This is bad.

24 Mar 2017 19:16:34
God I hope he's the one that clicked 'believable' for himself. There can't really be two people thinking like this, could there?

25 Mar 2017 17:42:45
This is so bad.

18 Mar 2017 14:51:28
Ok regarding duchene's underperformance and goal drought with the avalanche, the asking price will for sure decrease. Here's a look at an offseason trade:

Ottawa: Ceci, Nick Paul, 2017 3rd

Colorado: Duchene


18 Mar 2017 14:59:48
I agree that his value has gone down slightly but this is a drastic change from what Colorado wants. He is still worth more than this.

18 Mar 2017 15:02:01
then colorado just say no haha.

18 Mar 2017 17:21:34
Yeah still a big no from Colorado man.

18 Mar 2017 21:26:20
Turn the 3rd into a 1st and they still decline. Lol. There will be better offers.

19 Mar 2017 14:33:23
Guys he only scored a goal in his last 16ish games. I respect that he's a good player and all but just looking at those numbers, i believe a first rounder plus ceci plus Nick paul is too much for his production.

19 Mar 2017 14:56:03

Then why bother trading for him then? You made a severly undervalued trade, and if a counter offer is too much for your liking, why do you bother then? Duchene may have only 1 point in 16 games, but he's playing on a lowly Avalanche team. Riley Sheahan was supposedly being offered around for a 1stish, and he has no goals at all.

Point being, Ceci + Paul + 1st is too little for Matt Duchene. Honestly, an offer would start with Chabot+.

19 Mar 2017 16:58:18
Lol. You want to trade for a guy, But talk him down like he's nothing. So why do you want to trade for him?
Because deep down you knows he's very good and that package you offered isn't enough at all. Not even close. You're just trying to get a steal in a guy not playing well at the moment on the worst team in the league. Just so you know, Colorados executives aren't that stupid. Neither are we.

20 Mar 2017 11:34:40
Crazyattack please stop with these, you're making Ottawa fans look like idiots with these trades for Duchene. Realistically one of Chabot or White would have to go the other way, plus other players.

20 Mar 2017 19:00:02
I keep watching, but see little to no value for Ceci. 2 games this weekend and no impact to the game at all.

Agree with Top. Chabot + NHL roster player ( Turris? ) + Top prospect required to pull the trade trigger.

20 Mar 2017 21:12:54
Avs aren't trading duchene based on his last 16 games lol therefore they aren't accepting a garbage offer reflecting his last 16 games. With you're mentality, filip forsberg, who had 11 goals in 5 games a cpl weeks ago is worth more than anyone in the NHL other than Crosby and Marchand right now. Get your head straight, duchene is a great player, on a severely misguided and discouraged team, but that doesn't make him worthless as an individual player.

20 Mar 2017 21:49:23
Lol okay you just turned a bad trade into a really horrible trade K99.

20 Mar 2017 23:39:45
Fair trade. If it's Chabot +. The + wouldn't be Turris, wow. Chabot, Turris for Duchane is now too much.
You're always so way off with all of your evaluations, it's crazy.

21 Mar 2017 10:51:48
The worst part is that he said Chabot Turkish and a really good prospect.

21 Mar 2017 12:25:43
Oh no, I didn't even see that. Chabot, Turris AND a really good prospect. Man he's delusional.

21 Mar 2017 14:44:13
Pffffftttt. Please~~~~
You don't net an all star unless you give up something of quality. Organizational Suicide to let Ducy go for any LESS than that.
Sorry. To those that disagree. go and read some sports pages, watch sports center etc for once in your life and come back with something intelligent to add to the conversation. The asking price has not changed.

Duchy is an all star. Chabot and Turris are not. Plain and simple as that.
Why do you think Duchy didn't go at the trade deadline? Because of people like yourselves that don't understand that to get a still young all-star it costs dearly.

So please stop being so Naive and come back when you have something realistic to add to the conversation instead of posting accusations of delusion when it is obviously you who needs to give the head the ol shake and wake up if you think asking price for duchy is any less than that.

21 Mar 2017 16:00:18
Turris and Chabot for Duchene isn't all that bad IMO.

21 Mar 2017 16:10:01
Maybe the Canucks should go for him?
Grandlund and Joleivi ( however ya spell it? )

21 Mar 2017 19:11:00
fairtrade, Iginla was also an all-star many imes, so why did he get traded for literally nothing?

Oh, right, because what players did years ago is meaningless.

21 Mar 2017 19:21:36
I understand Duchene is a very good player, but trading Chabot and Turris would be a mistake.

Turris is a real steady 2nd line centre and Chabot is a very good d prospect (something Ottawa sorely needs) .

Let's put it this way - There is no deal to be had between Ottawa and Colorado for Duchene or Landeskog based on asking prices. If a deal does happen, someone is getting fleeced either way.

21 Mar 2017 21:43:42
Duchene at 25 and iginla at 38 or 39 is a really dumb comparison. At 25 years old you are trading for what a guy still might become, along with what strides he's made and what he's accomplished to this point. Adding iggy when he's pushing 40, his career is fully on paper to be seen. That's a rediculous point to make.

21 Mar 2017 21:48:48
Not to mention that iggy is ending his career and on an expiring contract and duchene has term left. Nothing about these 2 players is comparable except they're both good lol.

22 Mar 2017 03:22:02
You totally missed my point.

22 Mar 2017 18:50:11
I saw the point you're making, what you did years ago doesn't matter. However we don't have to think back 5 years to see that duchene was a good player. He still is a very good player. It's not like trying to remember Rene Bourque who's a perennial waiver wire player was a good goal scorer once.

It's Matt duchene. He played for Canada at the last olympics, he's picked by great hockey coaches and managers as being in the best 15 forwards born in Canada. It's not the same comparing him to an over the hill player.

23 Mar 2017 00:28:46
In absolutely no way am I comparing the two, how can you not see that?

I'm making a comment on fairtrade saying Duchene has super high trade value because he was an all-star and all the other things he did in the past, while Turris and Chabot have substantially less value because they achieved less in past years.

In terms of valuing a player, little if any value should be given to what has been done in the past. All that matters if you are acquiring someone, or really anything if you want to talk in more general terms, is what you believe it will provide for you in the future, because what it did in the past has not and will not help you.

In short, I'm not comparing Duchene to anyone, nor am I offering what I think his value is. I'm just pointing to how ridiculous someone else's valuation method is.

23 Mar 2017 05:28:18
Duchenes only as good as his last game/ season then? I'll go Letestu and a 3rd.

23 Mar 2017 07:11:00
I assume that's directed at me, so point me to where I said that, because I seem to be unable to find it. What I can find me saying is his value is what one thinks he can bring in the future, rather than what he has done in the past. You may want to work on your reading comprehension.

24 Mar 2017 03:14:38
First off when fair trade said all star I think he meant really good player not just a player in an all star game. Secondly you jumped on a guy for trying saying Duchene is an all star with a terrible comparison. But anyways how can you think what you've done in the past has little to no affect on your value? Guys values jump all the time from having breakout seasons. Not to mention looking at Duchenes past stats with surely show you what your getting.

24 Mar 2017 21:29:58
It's got to be a balance of both future and past like I said with duchene. If guys only look to the future than surely Eric staal would have been left unsigned or on a one year 1 million dollar 'prove it' type deal. Instead, a GM looked beyond an awful season last year in Carolina and finish to the season in NY and said "this guy has been a superstar at times, and a real good player the rest of his career. I believe he can help us again" now he's having the best season he's had in 4 years, and is a big reason minny is doing so well this year. If they didn't look further back than last year, he's unemployed. Don't tell me GMs don't look at what players have done in the past when assessing moves. No one can actually think that's true.

24 Mar 2017 21:38:27
There's a trend now that gms give large 6-8 year deals to players after their entry level contracts, in hopes that they live up to and exceed them but I don't believe that any GM would be happy to have more of a track record and history on a player before Making those commitments and limiting the chance it's going to bite them in the ass.

01 Mar 2017 18:23:01
Det: Lazar, 2nd
Ott: Vanek

01 Mar 2017 18:54:56
Vanek is already gone to Florida for a 3rd.

01 Mar 2017 20:49:25
And lazar is in calgary.

02 Mar 2017 00:16:35
Lazar has bust written all over him at this point. Not sure why Tre made this move.

02 Mar 2017 09:06:02
Yeah does Lazar have that much more going for him than Yak did? He got a pretty good return IMO.

02 Mar 2017 16:04:19
Being an Ottawa and Calgary fan I kinda like the trade for both teams. Calgary is taking a chance on a guy who could fit their needs if he turns it around and is given a chance and Ottawa reclaimed a 2nd in this year's draft. JJ and Kostka are throw ins.

04 Mar 2017 03:10:50
Lazar was so good for Canada juniors on the team with domi and duclair. I just find it so hard to believe that disappears in 2 short years. Confidence and momentum can disappear but not talent. Just hope the lack of opportunity and confidence didn't hurt his passion. Seems like a good kid. Hope he gets it together. I'd be happy if my team took a chance on him for a mid second in a weak class.

28 Feb 2017 21:51:29
Ottawa: Stalberg

Carolina: 2017 3rd

Ottawa IMO wins on this one.
Ottawa lineup as of right now:


Pretty decent lineup for the senators. If they can pickup a good shutdown defencemen, team looks lit

28 Feb 2017 22:33:28
No room for lazar anymore. Heard they were offered a second but they want a first.

28 Feb 2017 23:22:16
yeah right good one you sens fans will believe anything.

01 Mar 2017 12:58:24
Hey "great" john - do you literally only scour this site for Ottawa trades and make derogatory comments on them? Only time I've seen your name come up is commenting about Sens fans, without ever providing any real value to the site. Congrats, you provide no value to any conversation.

28 Feb 2017 21:33:29
To Ott: Micheal Del Zotto
To Phi: 6th and Nick Paul

Then to top it off!

To Ott: Duchene and 6th
To Col: Cody Ceci, 1st, Colin White

Now I've heard that there is an offer on the table for lazar which is a 2nd round draft pick.

might have to add that second on one of those two trades but with a healthy line up this is what we could look forward to:


Phaneuf- Del Zotto


Could be a serious Playoff Run Team.

28 Feb 2017 22:22:05
Edit: Stalberg-Brassard-Pageau

28 Feb 2017 22:34:09
Doubtful Colorado will accept that for Duchy.

Perron and Chabot instead of White is probably more along the lines of the price to attain him.

28 Feb 2017 23:16:24
I don't know too much about prospects but as a Flyers fan I think Ottawa says no

28 Feb 2017 23:59:38
Not enough for MDZ. Some defenseman have gone for crazy returns so far, MDZhas been a pretty good defenseman for the Flyers overall, except when the head coach wants to play head games with defenseman.

01 Mar 2017 00:30:45
add in Brassard to that lineup and you got an even better team :p Still probs isn't enough to beat the stacked caps.

01 Mar 2017 00:53:21
You forgot Brassard.

01 Mar 2017 02:59:35
Lol your second line should be the first line.

28 Feb 2017 21:00:44
To njd:
Bobby Ryan, 2018 2nd

To ottawa:
Adam henrique, 2017 1st

Actually did here this one circulating.

28 Feb 2017 21:16:59
Ottawa would probably say yes to their 1st alone for Ryan (without retaining) .
If this was actually proposed Ottawa should/ would say yes in a heart beat. Then can use some of that money to sign/ trade for someone else, another top 6 winger.

28 Feb 2017 21:39:08
Is that even benefiting New Jersey tho?

28 Feb 2017 21:58:09
Ottawa says yes and hangs up before Shero can take it back.

28 Feb 2017 22:35:50
Sorry, Ryan's a sen till the day he's bought out with that Luongo style contract length.

01 Mar 2017 03:55:10
What exactly does everyone have against Ryan? He's still top 6 caliber and plays better with higher caliber players to which he and hall would be crazy together. He might not be worth 7+ million but he is worth between 5-6 million whether people care to admit it or not.

Also note that this year's 1st not all that valuable and probably has same value as next year's 2nd. Ryan adds more scoring to njd when added to halls line while henrique adds grittyNess to ottawa and could play nearly any situation win for both sides.

27 Feb 2017 21:41:04
Confirmed trade

Ottawa: Burrows
Vancouver: Jonathan Dahlen

IMO that's a bad trade for Ottawa.

27 Feb 2017 21:55:39
Ya what the heck is Dorian thinking omg. What a brutal trade. Leading scorer for Swedish div 1 team for a old crap player. Wow.

27 Feb 2017 22:03:15
Steal for Vancouver. Exactly the kind of trade they need to make to rebuild.

27 Feb 2017 22:12:18
Media has been trying to pump him up for a while now.
Watching his play. he's slowed down a lot and hasn't done a lot in the past 2 years. Roll the dice and hope he is a playoff performer I guess.

Xcing. agree.

27 Feb 2017 22:32:49
New age Canucks, New Jim Benning.

27 Feb 2017 23:58:51
And they give him a 2 year extension at 2.5 mill per. He waived a NTC to go to Ottawa, but does he have a NMC? I thought he did which means Ottawa would have to protect him, exposing smith, lazar and pageau (assuming they protect Ryan, stone, brassard, turris, Hoffman and I guess not MacArthur?! I could be wrong on the NMC tho.

28 Feb 2017 01:05:32
Forsberg Erat all over again. Good thing is that I hate the sens.

27 Feb 2017 21:26:15
Stars: Jordie Benn

Habs: 4th + Pateryn


Also talk of Burrows going to Ottawa.

27 Feb 2017 22:21:02
Lol, i heard on tsn there were rumours for burrows to Ott too, 5 seconds later, I look up at the tv, "Burrows to Ottawa" Lol!

27 Feb 2017 22:35:29
Not the big splash everyone was looking for from MTL, but not a bad trade. I like it.

27 Feb 2017 20:04:37
If Colorado accepts ceci and lazar instead of chabot:

To ottawa: Duchene
To Colorado: ceci, lazar, 2017 1st and 2018 4th

27 Feb 2017 20:12:41
Deal seems a bit more realistic than the usual propositions. I think the Av's would request someone else other than Lazar though.

27 Feb 2017 21:01:44
not nough lazar has very little value try late 2nd early 3rd.

28 Feb 2017 20:52:34
Lazar does not have very little value, he's a young 21, nhl experience, great potential, leadership qualities, and good for the locker room.

One bad year does not define a players trade value otherwise a lot of other teams would be getting ripped off bad.

27 Feb 2017 18:52:52
LW - Phil Varone $0.700

LA Kings:
RW - Teddy Purcell $0.800(50% Retained)

Dorion has said he wants to add a veteran winger, Teddy Purcell had his best years under Guy Boucher.

28 Feb 2017 00:10:56
I would have done this instead of the burrows for Dahlen deal lol but doesn't look likely now.

26 Feb 2017 16:09:16
Ottawa: Lazar, 2017 6th
Stars: Sharp

Ottawa forwards once everyone is healthy:


(last line is full of centers... so maybe try to put pageau on third line and switch someone around)

26 Feb 2017 16:58:07
Yeah I'd switch Pyatt and Pageau, but trade seems solid.

26 Feb 2017 17:48:44
I like this trade for both teams.

26 Feb 2017 18:31:59
Good proposal. I would maybe take Ottawa pick out and Dallas add that pic, only because of age of the two players. Other than that, Good idea really.

26 Feb 2017 16:09:10
Ott: JVR

Tor: 2017 1st and Filip Chalpik.

26 Feb 2017 16:26:59
Ceci or Chabot would have to be included. If the leafs trade him dman most certainly need to be included. Picks would need to be included one way or another to make it work.

26 Feb 2017 16:59:14
Two things @Itooldonscherry

1. Great name
2. Maybe Ceci, but definitely not Chabot.

26 Feb 2017 13:24:41
Ott: duchene

Col: Ceci, Marcus Hoberg, 2017 1st, nick Paul

Col gets Ceci a solid young d, Hoberg a top rookie goalie out of Sweden and nick Paul who with more development could turn into a second liner.

25 Feb 2017 18:19:36
Ottawa : Ceci, Lazar, Chalpik, Paul and 1st 2017

Colorado : Duchene or Landeskog, Tyutin 2nd 2017 and 4th 2018.

25 Feb 2017 18:23:51
I like the idea but it will be complicated to complete because of how many assest are going each way.

25 Feb 2017 18:35:07
Well the value for Duchene and Landeskog are very different. So that doesn't work regardless.

25 Feb 2017 19:35:35
Chabot, Cecil, lazar, Paul 2017 1st round pick,
For Tyson Barrie and duchene.

25 Feb 2017 20:08:15
Probs something Colorado would take, no way Ottawa does that lol ^.

25 Feb 2017 22:07:03
On Duncan's proposal I would actually say that's a no from Colorado. Based on Colrado's wants:
Duchene for Chabot + Paul + 1st
Which leaves:
Barrie for Ceci + Lazar (Which I assume is a no from the Avs)

25 Feb 2017 23:53:34
I agree with Duncan totally.

28 Feb 2017 20:58:34
This trade isn't half bad for Duchesne not Landy though. And with the contracts ottawa already picked up I'd think some retention on one of those contracts would be needed for either Duchesne or more likely tyutin.

25 Feb 2017 17:02:07
Ottawa : lazar, Bobby ryan (2 million retained) clapik
Edmonton: Jordan eberle, 2018 2nd round draft pick.

25 Feb 2017 18:02:26
I like it but Ottawa might have to add a pick or another prospect.

25 Feb 2017 18:05:37
So 5 more years of 5.25mil for Ryan, Lazar and a 2nd round prospect for Ebs and a 2nd. You sure Ottawa would even want to do that?

25 Feb 2017 18:21:52
I agree with Mcjesus because why would ottawa consider this. Lazar for second is okay but Ryan 2 mill retained on top of Clapik for Eberble is laughable. Ottawa Declines.

25 Feb 2017 18:33:28
Lazar for 2nd. fair enough
Ryan for Eberle. advantage Ottawa

Ottawa retains 1-2 mil on Ryan and adds a mid range prospect
Ryan hasn't fit in as a sen and could use a new surroundings and new start.

25 Feb 2017 20:10:01
If ryan had 3mil retained (which obvs wouldn't happen unless they were desperate) I could see Edmonton trading Ebs straight up for him easily. Clearly his contract is the problem.

01 Mar 2017 04:02:05
Ebs not doing any better than Ryan and his contract just as bad so why would ottawa have to retain it makes no sense especially when edmonton also getting Lazar for less than a 1st. Ottawa says no as is unless retention taken away.

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass