11 Feb 2015 23:43:45
You read it here first if McDavid is drafted by one of Edmonton, Buffalo, or Carolina he will not report! Be cautious above mentioned teams he could very well pull a Lindros. If he does such a thing does that not affect his trade value in a negative way? let's face facts the NHL wants McDavid playing for the Leafs simply because of marketing capabilities. So if the NHL puts in a fix during draft lottery (who knows) its been done before look for the number one pick to be traded and acquired by the Leafs


1.) 12 Feb 2015
Bettman cares about money and building hockey in the states. If it's fixed Arizona will get it because it's one of the few ways to stir up enough interest to keep hockey in the desert like Bettman wants. Win or lose toronto will bring in roughly the same revenue so Bettman really couldn't care less where they're picking in the draft they'll sell out no matter what


2.) 12 Feb 2015
1. If mcdavid is drafted by one of those 3, he will report. If you truly believe he won't, you're a moron.

2. Wouldn't be at all surprised if the leafs win the draft because they've been intentionally crashing to earth all 2015. Pretty pathetic.


3.) 12 Feb 2015
12 Feb 2015 08:15:41
Huzzah, chirp. so right.


4.) 12 Feb 2015
This. And where did you get that from GOLEAFSGO?


5.) 12 Feb 2015
Yet the oilers are still second last in the league


6.) 12 Feb 2015
Honestly believe the Leafs or Yotes are going to be picking 1st. Leafs won't win the draft but I wouldn't be surprised if Nonis made a huge trade for 1st overall. Yotes are right near the bottom and I see them continuing to do terrible once you trade away guys like Vermette, Hanzal, Mikaleck, and Yandle.


7.) 13 Feb 2015
@chuck Oilers are playing around 0.500 hockey since that person Eakins was fired (SWARM!). They're on the way to playing themselves out of contention for Mc or E.
Meanwhile the leafs fired their coach while still in playoff contention and have been ridiculously and oddly bad ever since, taking a quick and convenient slide down the standings. Tough to compare the two.


8.) 13 Feb 2015
Who chuck I wasn't aware that their was a chuck in the this discussion let alone on this thread.


9.) 14 Feb 2015
Charles = chuck, like robert = bob or william = bill


10.) 15 Feb 2015
Thanks, Ovie. Pretty sure he got it, but was just avoiding posting an attempt at a legit response because he didn't have a good one.


11.) 15 Feb 2015
No Charles = Professor X, Chucky = Chuck


12.) 15 Feb 2015
Further proof, as he replies and it's still just filler.