02 Jan 2017 17:19:27
Mtl:Gallagher, Patches

Min:Granlund, Brodin.

1.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 17:25:34
Gallagher>>Grandlund
Patches>>>>Brodin

Montreal isn't in need of a Dman that bad.

2.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 17:27:03
Montreal would be better off with Gally and Patches than Granlund and Brodin.

3.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 17:55:24
They need a top 4 D and a second line center so I disagree.

4.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 18:08:51
Yes Habs need both. but not at that price.

5.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 18:09:46
And not those guys. Need North American grit. not Scandinavian softies.

6.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 18:51:25
Montreal is definitely losing this trade by a mile. Two very important players on their team for a second line player and just a top 4? I don't even like Habs but it's pretty obvious that's a bad trade for them. Not worth it.

7.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 20:15:21
Patches would be the best player on the wild he's a 40 goal scorer in the middle of his prime he could get that him self terrible trade.

8.) 02 Jan 2017
02 Jan 2017 21:55:38
Cleary you don't watch the Habs games. He dosnt score for 20 games then he gets a hat trick same over and over. Why do you think Torteralla made him play on the fourth line with team USA. Theirs not a lot of teamm that would want him he's a guy who plays well when he wants Wich is only certain nights.

9.) 03 Jan 2017
03 Jan 2017 01:46:32
I watch a lot and he has his slumps but he is still a top 10 LW in the game.

10.) 04 Jan 2017
04 Jan 2017 04:18:02
you need patch and gally so this trade makes no sense, so i believe next year is when bergevine and the hab make there move, as habs we want alot, other team fans believe we have nothing to offer, wrong but that ok, it will be during july 1 st for next year without giving either juulsen or sergachov, and i believe both will be on the starting lineup in 2017.