05 Nov 2014 07:15:59
Edmonton - Bozak, Gardiner, Lupul and a 1st

Toronto - Hall and a roster player

If we are ready to overpay for Stall. Why not overpay for a better player.


1.) 05 Nov 2014
I don't think they trade Hall. At least not for those Players. Hall is too valuable. You'd have to start with Reilly if you wanna make Edmonton think about it.


2.) 05 Nov 2014
05 Nov 2014 14:23:02
Yes, 2 out of JVR, Rielly and Nylanders would have to be included. And you still add from there.
Hall is delivering more than 1PPG playing for EDM. Not too bad.


3.) 06 Nov 2014
To Draisaitl_94;
I THINK you know hockey but your HATRED for the Leafs is distorting your thinking. Your above statement is just plain ridiculous. Please rethink your comments and respond.


4.) 06 Nov 2014
With Lupul and JVR, they don't need another top 6 winger.


5.) 06 Nov 2014
06 Nov 2014 08:19:01
Thanks a lot Cheeks, but a combined 41-7 for benn14 and me seem to prove me right.
Whats your problem? I don't even hate the leafs. Only thing I don't like is a big part of their fans totally overvaluing each and every player.
Hall is a #1 pick, a franchise player despite playing mostly wing which is impressive enough to begin with.
EDM really isn't a good team, but he puts up 1+PPG every damn year.
So, I think TOR starts with 2 out of these 3. JVR is great, I love him. But Hallis arguably better and has a way higher ceiling. Nylander hasn't proven anything yet, but has some good value.
Thats what EDM would want to have back for someone like Taylor Hall. No one forces you to pay that price, but I think you have to pay that price if you want to get Hall.
Thats not undervaluing leafs players, but being realistic trade value wise.


6.) 06 Nov 2014
I agree with Drais. Bozak, Gardiner are both good players. But Hall is agruably already one, if not the best LW in the League. He has now played 257 games for 98 - 137 - 235 in 5 seasons.

Compare that with JVR. 336 games for 100 - 100 - 200 in 6 seasons.

Playoffs not included. (JVR in 46 games 13 - 9 - 22)

So you agree that they have to add to JVR if they want to trade for Hall.

Thats not undervaluing. At least not in this trade proposal.

So overpaying for Hall is not Bozak, Gardiner, Lupul and 1st it's more like JVR, Reilly + pick or prospect. Even then I'd keep Hall.


7.) 07 Nov 2014
@draisaitl_94 I know hall is really good but don't you think that's a bit of an overpayment I mean don't get me wrong I hate the leafs but jvr and reilly+ is too much because jvr is good but not enough but then you say reilly, I get that jvr alone isn't enough but when you say reilly you go to an overpayment because reilly will be monster, then you say + so then its just you're hatred of leaf fans proposing a trade to your oils franchise player


8.) 07 Nov 2014
@Cheeks

I agree that Toronto has to overpay for Hall. But the operative word in that sentence is "overpay". In other words, it's an overpayment to send 2 of JVR, Rielly or Nylander + other pieces.

So if you're looking for a consolation prize, it's maybe that Hall isn't worth that much in a vacuum trade but he is worth that much in a real world trade.


9.) 07 Nov 2014
Yeah your comments did make me think over the proposal and I really never offered a player that shows a huge potential on becoming a building block or a franchise player for the Oilers. Jvr or Reilly would have to be added. Not both. But Percy or another decent prospect would have to be involved. I would love hall on the leafs and also would love to see Reimer on another team. Maybe Lupul, Reimer, kadri and a first. I guess no matter what I say I will be told I'm overvaluing leaf players. But it goes both ways. Leaf haters undervalue leaf players because they have arguebly the biggest fan base. :p


10.) 07 Nov 2014
07 Nov 2014 16:49:03
@caryprice31: of eaf fans proposing a trade to your ois franchise player? I'm a TBL fan, so Hall isn't my franchise player.
As I said: You could very well argue that JVR + Rielly is too much, but I guarantee you that you won't get Hall for anything below that.
Lupul, Reimer, Kadri and 1st isn't anything that replaces you Hall.
Hall is en elite player and would already be a superstar if he was on a better team. You don't get superstars for an often-injured aging 2nd liner, a goalie that's borderline between good backup and bad starter, a #2 center that has yet to live up to his potential and a 1st pick that might not even be in the lottery.
Just not going to happen.


11.) 08 Nov 2014
@Draisaitl_94 I honestly think, that you are the best 'commenter' on this website currently. Although, you comment what you think is wrong, on 'bad' posts. Never good, like 'yeah, I guess that works' or good job. But, that's my opinion. Otherwise definitely one of the best on this webiste


12.) 08 Nov 2014
Sorry Draisait_ , I thought you meant to add the 2 of 3 to the original proposal of Bozak, Gardiner Lupul and a 1st.
My bad.


13.) 08 Nov 2014
08 Nov 2014 08:53:43
@NHLFunFacts: Oh well, thanks Sir! And you're right, but part of the reason for it is, that approx 3/4+ proposed trades on here are rather unrealistic. But I should really do that, too, I agree.
@Cheeks27: Oh haha, no no. That'd be too much of course. And wouldn't work cap wise anyways.


14.) 08 Nov 2014
08 Nov 2014 11:46:11
Yes, nhlfunfacts, Draisaitl offers the most balanced, insiteful, and unbiased comments.


15.) 08 Nov 2014
There is too much posted about this. All that needs to be said is:

You're clearly a leafs fan who lives in a fantasy world because this trade is garbage.


16.) 08 Nov 2014
I would like to visit the fantasy world that Leafs fans live in one day, it seems like a magical place where career AHLer's are demi-gods worth more then Stamkos, and human Pylons acquired from Calgary are revered as the best defencemen since a kid from Perry Sound, ahh Leafs fans they sure are lucky!


17.) 08 Nov 2014
@Chirp I very much enjoyed when you didn't post rude things on peoples trades. Just tell them no and why that doesn't work. Or even just click the unbelievable. There is no need to be rude. None of the posts on this website are 'garbage'. They might not be realistic but people put time into this not for it to be called garbage. Thank you.

^^^
IMO