07 Aug 2016 05:39:20
EDM: 2nd Round Pick, Mark Fayne
CGY: Micheal Ferland, Dennis Wideman

EDM: 3rd Round Pick, Mark Letestu
ANA: Nick Ritchie

EDM: Nail Yakupov, 5th Round Pick
PHI: Travis Sanhiem

EDM: Griffin Reinhart, Benoit Pouliot
TB: Brian Boyle, Jason Garrison, 3rd Round Pick

EDM: Brandon Davidson, Zack Kassian
CGY: Michael Frolik

Lucic - McDavid - Eberle
Maroon - Nugent-Hopkins - Frolik
Ferland - Draisaitl - Puljujarvi
Ritchie - Boyle - Hendricks

Klefbom - Larsson
Nurse - Wideman
Sekera - Garrison

Big bodies for the playoff run in how many years.

1.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 05:48:45
The Anahiem and Philly trades are laughable.

2.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 06:02:17
How are they laughable? They aren't exactly that bad, Ritchie hasn't proven anything, and neither has sanhiem. Yak's ceiling is higher, well was higher, and a 3rd and a vet on a very flexible contract is worth Ritchie. Who's ceiling isn't that high. He just has really good size, which is what Edmonton wants. But the other trades need work. I'd say not that bad for a guy who posts the most delirious trades all the time.

3.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 06:20:41
Sanhiem>>>Yakapov and a 2nd

Ritchie>>> 3rd

Lestu=a 7th.

4.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 06:38:58
I would love it if Boyle and Garrison came to Edmonton, but Garrison is a LD unfortunately. Anyways Boyle wouldn't be playing the 4th line, and Garrison and Sekera won't be playing on the 3rd pairing. Oilers should stay away from Wideman, even if they get the chance to trade Fayne. I honestly would love Ritchie to play the 3rd line LW, but none of these trades make sense before expansion time.

5.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 06:39:17
Ritchie = 3rd + Letestu
Yak + 2nd = Sanhiem

6.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 06:54:14
I agree with flying V

7.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 07:35:31
If that's the best offer for Nick Ritchie surely Ducks would just ride it out with him and keep him and see what he turns out to be. You guys have to remember he's only 20 years old lol. It's not a surprise he hasn't proved anything, Ritchie is no general talent obviously so give him some time.

8.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 07:57:38
I don't see him being a great player. I think his size is what really makes him a threat.

9.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 07:58:46
I'm draft eligible in 2018. U guys prolly aren't so I'm sure I have more hockey sense than any of you. But I agree with BJ and V.

10.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 08:03:08
It's fair, I think a 2nd is fair for Ferland at this time but who knows how good he'll turn out or if he'll stay a 4th liner. Ritchie in my opinion isn't very offensive gifted but has size. And I like the size that he has. But Anaheim can get a better return for a young player like that. And in my opinion the yak trade is fair.

11.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 12:39:34
Look, Ritchie is really the one really good forward prospect they have, so they have no reason to trade him, especially not. for that package that was offered.

12.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 14:54:35
I'm 2019 eligible what team do you play on American Tank.

13.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 19:19:17
Omfg you guys are talking about your draft years hahahahahahaha okay.

14.) 07 Aug 2016
07 Aug 2016 21:06:52
I'll trade Sparks and a conditional 1st for BarDownBeauty.