05 Sep 2016 19:08:49
Habs- pacioretty, juulsen, Gallagher and 2rd pick
Tampa- kucherov and killorn.


1.) 05 Sep 2016
05 Sep 2016 20:23:37
your name should be Lightning4life with an offer like that.


2.) 05 Sep 2016
05 Sep 2016 20:35:20
Montreal would have a huge hole at LW and Montreal wouldn't be the ones adding the prospect and pick.


3.) 05 Sep 2016
05 Sep 2016 21:06:34
Lol what, yes they are. Kucherov is clearly the best player in there and Killorn is undervalued.
Juulsen and a 2nd, maybe too much, but certainly it's not TB adding.


4.) 05 Sep 2016
05 Sep 2016 21:39:33
Huge hell no from Tampa.


5.) 05 Sep 2016
05 Sep 2016 23:06:46
Lightning add a bit VALUE WISE, not TEAM NEED WISE

Patches + Juulsen + 2nd i'd say equal Kuch if not are more valuable than him, Juulsen is a decent d prospect who could pan into a top 4, Patches is a legitimate 40 goal scorer so yea (although he is a UFA so i get the point made that maybe TB doesn't add) Gallagher > Killorn due to his playing nature, and his point totals over the past years.

Honest though, trading Kucherov to a divisional rival isn't TBs goal of the summer, so what's the REAL incentive for them? An offer for Kuch should be mind blowing - so really if Patches was signed for longer term then yes, but since he isn't there just isn't one for TB. And montreal doesn't make the trade because it really doesn't improve any aspect of them (prospect wise, scoring wise)

- From a sincere non-habs fan.


6.) 05 Sep 2016
05 Sep 2016 23:08:11
Wow now there are two biased lightning hosers on the page lol. Yes drais kucherov is clearly the best player like c'mon man.


7.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 01:35:43
What would be a desired return for Kucherov if in fact they need to trade him for cap purposes.


8.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 01:42:24
Way too much for Kucherov and killorn

What are you thinking?
Juulsen, 2nd > Killorn
Gallagher, Patches > Kucherov

Try Gallagher, Patches, 2nd

Seems more fair

Patches > Killorn
Gallagher, 2nd > Kucherov


9.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 05:16:37
Most of what top shelf said wasn't bad except patches is not a ufa he still has 3 years left on a wonderfully priced contract. Kucherov on the other hand depending on what kind of contract he signs possibly 6 mil plus per year. may actually have less value then patches eventhough some people would not admit to it cause they think he is among the best players to ever lace them up. He's a good player playing on a real good line in a pressure less environment but 66 pts doesn't make him " easily" better then a player who has put up equally decent seasons with david desharnais as his center.


10.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 05:38:34
Sorry it was clearly the better player not easily lol.


11.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 06:37:25
Who else, Hab?
Kucherov has now been Tampas best forward for two years in a row on a team featuring Steven Stamkos. They have equal career-highs in points (67 vs 66) and Kucherov is much younger, therefore still has potential.

Kucherov > Pacioretty > Gallagher > Killorn.


12.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 12:59:21
Kuch is the best player in the deal. Patches is a hell of a player Kuch just has a better all around game. Like Drais said he's stuck out on a team featuring Stamkos. Not that it affects the trade value but i wouldn't want Gallagher on my team same way i wouldn't want Marchand. He prides himself on dirty hits and running goalies i'd rather play with class. He is young only 24 but he will experience a sharp Callahan like decline likely about the time Callahan deal ends. Anyway. Kuch is a better player than Patches but Patches has an amazing contract. Killer is a fantastic 2 way and character player that turns it on in the playoffs. Gallagher is an effective player who gets under other teams skin but i could never cheer for Marchand 2.0. I don't see much special in Juulsen and 2nd would ebd up a late second.


13.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 14:55:29
First off he's been better then stamkos only because by his standards stamkos has sucked the last two years. second I wouldn't have cared if you had just said kucherov was the best player in the deal. But you had to be a biased moron like always when it comes to comparing Tampa players with habs players.3rd you forget the point I made about kucherov actually having line mates who are good players as we'll. @ jbs kucherov better all around then patches? explain why please.


14.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 17:17:10
Kuch is better than patches. but I'd like to see patches play along side stammer. They might even out a bit more under those circumstances but the big unknown is really the cost of a new Kuch contract. Patches is still under a great deal and with Kuch probably landing something much larger I think patches value will be better.


15.) 06 Sep 2016
06 Sep 2016 22:04:40
Spot on thunder turkey couldn't agree more.


16.) 07 Sep 2016
07 Sep 2016 04:35:15
Tampa adds Drouin and it's a deal.


17.) 08 Sep 2016
08 Sep 2016 02:41:52
Tamps add Drouin.